CONVICTION OVERTURNED MD - Hae Min Lee, 17, Baltimore, 13 Jan 1999 #2



 
I know you do. I, however, do not. When you read everything it is clear he murdered Hae. Some say he has served enough time and was young when it occurred. I could get on board with that if he admitted his guilt. What burns my butt is how this has played out. All one needs to subvert justice is a loud-mouthed, relentless friend who is willing to lie and a States Attorney under indictment, looking to redirect public attention from her own trial.
I think you need to listen to the Truth & Justice Reply Brief series. It is a response to the prosecutors podcast. There is zero definitive evidence in the files that conclusive prove Adnan killed Hae. This is a pure conjecture case based on testimony from two know drug dealing liars, JW and JP, two corrupt detectives that have been exposed in three similar cases, M & R, and cell phone records that were overstated and not conclusive.
 

“This case is not about Mr. Syed’s underlying innocence or guilt. That dispute is simply not in the room today,” said Ari Rubin, an attorney for the Lee family, during Thursday’s arguments.

He said the issue at hand was whether the rights of Lee’s brother, Young Lee, were violated because he was unable to substantively participate in the process, which Rubin called extraordinary “in that it aligns the interests of the defendant and the state.” He argued victims and their attorneys should fulfill an adversarial role.

But several justices expressed skepticism about whether state law expressly spells out a victim’s right to be heard in such hearings where a conviction is vacated.

“Why isn’t this a question for the General Assembly? The right that you’re speaking of is not in the plain language of the statute,” said Judge Brynja Booth.

Some justices also questioned why the hearing that vacated Syed’s conviction was scheduled so hastily. Prosecutors told Young Lee about the hearing on a Friday and scheduled it for the following Monday, leaving him no reasonable opportunity to travel to Baltimore from his California home and attend in person. Instead, he ended up addressing the court via Zoom.

Justice Shirley Watts said the outcome of the hearing seemed predetermined, including Syed’s immediate release from custody. And Justice Lynne Battaglia spoke about properly balancing the rights of victims and defendants.

Depending on the outcome of the appeal, Syed faces at least the potential of being sent back to prison, a point his lawyers raised in recent court filings.
/////
More recently, Baltimore prosecutors re-examined Syed’s files under a Maryland law targeting so-called “juvenile lifers” because he was 17 when Hae Min Lee’s body was found. Prosecutors uncovered numerous problems, including alternative suspects and the unreliable evidence presented at trial. Instead of reconsidering his sentence, prosecutors filed a motion to vacate Syed’s conviction entirely, leading to his release last year.
 

“This case is not about Mr. Syed’s underlying innocence or guilt. That dispute is simply not in the room today,” said Ari Rubin, an attorney for the Lee family, during Thursday’s arguments.

He said the issue at hand was whether the rights of Lee’s brother, Young Lee, were violated because he was unable to substantively participate in the process, which Rubin called extraordinary “in that it aligns the interests of the defendant and the state.” He argued victims and their attorneys should fulfill an adversarial role.

But several justices expressed skepticism about whether state law expressly spells out a victim’s right to be heard in such hearings where a conviction is vacated.

“Why isn’t this a question for the General Assembly? The right that you’re speaking of is not in the plain language of the statute,” said Judge Brynja Booth.

Some justices also questioned why the hearing that vacated Syed’s conviction was scheduled so hastily. Prosecutors told Young Lee about the hearing on a Friday and scheduled it for the following Monday, leaving him no reasonable opportunity to travel to Baltimore from his California home and attend in person. Instead, he ended up addressing the court via Zoom.

Justice Shirley Watts said the outcome of the hearing seemed predetermined, including Syed’s immediate release from custody. And Justice Lynne Battaglia spoke about properly balancing the rights of victims and defendants.

Depending on the outcome of the appeal, Syed faces at least the potential of being sent back to prison, a point his lawyers raised in recent court filings.
/////
More recently, Baltimore prosecutors re-examined Syed’s files under a Maryland law targeting so-called “juvenile lifers” because he was 17 when Hae Min Lee’s body was found. Prosecutors uncovered numerous problems, including alternative suspects and the unreliable evidence presented at trial. Instead of reconsidering his sentence, prosecutors filed a motion to vacate Syed’s conviction entirely, leading to his release last year.
I'm rooting for Adnan.
 
MOO. I believe there are some new-ish (starting in October 2023) Truth and Jutice segments regarding this case. I haven’t had a chance to check them out tho. MOO.
 
I think you need to listen to the Truth & Justice Reply Brief series. It is a response to the prosecutors podcast. There is zero definitive evidence in the files that conclusive prove Adnan killed Hae. This is a pure conjecture case based on testimony from two know drug dealing liars, JW and JP, two corrupt detectives that have been exposed in three similar cases, M & R, and cell phone records that were overstated and not conclusive.
After I read this post, I first listened to The Prosecutors Legal Brief Series. Because they are prosecutors, I thought that gave them some credibility. At times I found them rather arrogant, “trust us, we’re prosecutors”, and I did not care for their treatment of Asia McLain. I thought they glossed over the poor investigation of Don, and minimized the liver mortis evidence in a way that was not convincing to me. But I expected them to be truthful and detailed with the facts. They did give me some doubt that perhaps Adnan is guilty after all.
I then listened to the Truth and Justice Reply Brief series (apparently Bob Ruff did it at first for his paid subscribers but is now releasing episodes on the free podcast) I am working my way through these reply episodes. I am shocked at how much it seems the Prosecutors cherry-picked their facts, and used seemingly sketchy sources as fact (such as Reddit versions of timelines) In the episode in which they lay out their respective theories of the murder, they do a great job and deliver very convincing, impassioned speeches about the murder of Hae Min Lee. Without Bob Ruff’s refutation of their so-called facts, I could have been fooled.

My takeaway from all these podcast hours spent on this - I was hopeful I had found a credible new podcast in the Prosecutors, but until they respond with facts to refute Bob Ruff, I find them untrustworthy, and will be unlikely to ever listen to another of their episodes.

In the early days post Serial when various folks were podcasting about this case, I honestly did not think much of Bob Ruff. But today I see him as perhaps the single most unbiased person with the greatest familiarity with the facts of the case.

I would like to see the Prosecutors and Bob Ruff get together in the spirit of finding the truth, for healthy discussion and search for the truth.
 

Maryland Supreme Court reinstates murder conviction of Adnan Syed and orders new hearing

Syed is allowed to remain free pending the new hearing, the justices wrote.​

The Maryland Supreme Court on Friday reinstated the murder conviction against Adnan Syed and ordered the circuit court to redo a hearing that cleared Syed’s name two years ago.
The court’s 4-3 decision brings yet another reversal for Syed and returns the long-running case to the status before a Baltimore judge threw out his conviction and released him from prison. Justices found Baltimore prosecutors and the lower court had violated the rights of Young Lee, the brother of the murdered Hae Min Lee.

 
Attorneys for the homicide victim’s family also argued in a Thursday court filing that the “Serial” podcast subject should be behind bars if his first-degree murder conviction ultimately stands.
 
Our new Websleuths server is making things faster and better than ever before. Plus, we don't have those obnoxious ads anymore.
If you enjoy what we do on Websleuths and don't want to see those headache-inducing, soul-sucking (I'm being dramatic, but they were awful) advertisements return, please take a moment and subscribe to DNA SOLVES.COM. By subscribing and making a monthly donation, you are helping families get the answers they deserve about their missing loved ones, and you can be assured we can continue to improve your Websleuths experience. CLICK HERE AND SUBSCRIBE TO DNA SOLVES
Thank you,
Tricia
P.S. If you want to know more or have questions, CLICK HERE. Please do not post on this thread.
 
On Tuesday, Baltimore State's Attorney Ivan Bates withdrew a motion to vacate Syed's murder conviction.

According to The Baltimore Banner, if Judge Jennifer B. Schiffer approves of the motion to reduce the prison sentence, Syed will not have to return to prison. However, his convictions for first-degree murder, robbery, kidnapping and false imprisonment will remain
 
With the help of an interpreter, Lee’s mother delivered an emotional impact statement in Korean through a pre-recorded video.

“On Jan. 13, 1999, on a cold rainy day, my daughter did not return,” she said. “Only her body returned on Feb. 10.”

Visibly shaken, she begged the court to reconsider overturning his life sentence. :( :(

“He was old enough, he was at an age he could think,” she said. “Please judge him accordingly.”
 
A Baltimore judge ruled that Adnan Syed, whose murder trial became the focus of the first season of the hit podcast "Serial," will remain free despite a standing murder conviction.
The ruling from the judge reduced Syed's sentence to time served, made possible by a new state law that provides a means for people convicted of crimes when they were minors to be released from incarceration, The Associated Press noted.
“This sentence will be followed by a period of five years of supervised probation,” Judge Jennifer Schiffer wrote in her ruling.
 

Similar threads

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
164
Guests online
570
Total visitors
734

Forum statistics

Threads
625,625
Messages
18,507,137
Members
240,826
Latest member
rhannie88
Back
Top