
Family of Hae Min Lee asks Maryland Supreme Court to hear appeal in Adnan Syed case
Attorney urges the court to take up the appeal and ensure that victims are given a 'meaningful voice.'
www.thebaltimorebanner.com
I think you need to listen to the Truth & Justice Reply Brief series. It is a response to the prosecutors podcast. There is zero definitive evidence in the files that conclusive prove Adnan killed Hae. This is a pure conjecture case based on testimony from two know drug dealing liars, JW and JP, two corrupt detectives that have been exposed in three similar cases, M & R, and cell phone records that were overstated and not conclusive.I know you do. I, however, do not. When you read everything it is clear he murdered Hae. Some say he has served enough time and was young when it occurred. I could get on board with that if he admitted his guilt. What burns my butt is how this has played out. All one needs to subvert justice is a loud-mouthed, relentless friend who is willing to lie and a States Attorney under indictment, looking to redirect public attention from her own trial.
Thank you for this info. It looks like we can watch the argument live (Oct. 5 at 10 am) via webcast here: https://www.courts.state.md.us/coappeals/webcasts![]()
Adnan Syed, Hae Min Lee's family to plead cases on Thursday to Maryland's highest court
Oral arguments are set for Thursday at Maryland's Supreme Court to potentially determine Adnan Syed's freedom.www.cbsnews.com
I'm rooting for Adnan.![]()
Maryland Supreme Court weighs victims' rights in case of Adnan Syed from 'Serial' podcast
The Maryland Supreme Court is scrutinizing the outcome of a hearing that vacated Adnan Syed’s murder conviction after he spent 23 years behind bars.apnews.com
“This case is not about Mr. Syed’s underlying innocence or guilt. That dispute is simply not in the room today,” said Ari Rubin, an attorney for the Lee family, during Thursday’s arguments.
He said the issue at hand was whether the rights of Lee’s brother, Young Lee, were violated because he was unable to substantively participate in the process, which Rubin called extraordinary “in that it aligns the interests of the defendant and the state.” He argued victims and their attorneys should fulfill an adversarial role.
But several justices expressed skepticism about whether state law expressly spells out a victim’s right to be heard in such hearings where a conviction is vacated.
“Why isn’t this a question for the General Assembly? The right that you’re speaking of is not in the plain language of the statute,” said Judge Brynja Booth.
Some justices also questioned why the hearing that vacated Syed’s conviction was scheduled so hastily. Prosecutors told Young Lee about the hearing on a Friday and scheduled it for the following Monday, leaving him no reasonable opportunity to travel to Baltimore from his California home and attend in person. Instead, he ended up addressing the court via Zoom.
Justice Shirley Watts said the outcome of the hearing seemed predetermined, including Syed’s immediate release from custody. And Justice Lynne Battaglia spoke about properly balancing the rights of victims and defendants.
Depending on the outcome of the appeal, Syed faces at least the potential of being sent back to prison, a point his lawyers raised in recent court filings.
/////
More recently, Baltimore prosecutors re-examined Syed’s files under a Maryland law targeting so-called “juvenile lifers” because he was 17 when Hae Min Lee’s body was found. Prosecutors uncovered numerous problems, including alternative suspects and the unreliable evidence presented at trial. Instead of reconsidering his sentence, prosecutors filed a motion to vacate Syed’s conviction entirely, leading to his release last year.
After I read this post, I first listened to The Prosecutors Legal Brief Series. Because they are prosecutors, I thought that gave them some credibility. At times I found them rather arrogant, “trust us, we’re prosecutors”, and I did not care for their treatment of Asia McLain. I thought they glossed over the poor investigation of Don, and minimized the liver mortis evidence in a way that was not convincing to me. But I expected them to be truthful and detailed with the facts. They did give me some doubt that perhaps Adnan is guilty after all.I think you need to listen to the Truth & Justice Reply Brief series. It is a response to the prosecutors podcast. There is zero definitive evidence in the files that conclusive prove Adnan killed Hae. This is a pure conjecture case based on testimony from two know drug dealing liars, JW and JP, two corrupt detectives that have been exposed in three similar cases, M & R, and cell phone records that were overstated and not conclusive.