WideOpen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
- Messages
- 2,537
- Reaction score
- 2,755
Eric Sean Clay ‏@EricSClay 2m2 minutes ago
I don't understand why every looter I see photos of, is stealing toilet paper.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDo6KtxWIAEddgj.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDo6KtmWoAAXPRF.jpg
lol
The one the media mis-characterized?
HUGE fire somewhere
Then how about "rioters" "miscreants" or "criminals"? The reason that other word is not allowed is because it is typically used to define criminals of a certain skin tone.
We have plenty of words to describe the actions here. We needn't use race-specific ones. Yes, I know the word was not originally used as such but contemporary usage is, indeed racist and I applaud WS for disallowing it.
IdiotsBecause after they burn all the stores it might be hard to find?
Call it what you want but a t*** by any other name would still stink. jmo
I see your point, but apparently, WS sees the trend of using that word in a racist or inflammatory way and has decided it is censored and I quite agree with that assessment.
I see your point, but apparently, WS sees the trend of using that word in a racist or inflammatory way and has decided it is censored and I quite agree with that assessment.