annthenerd
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2020
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 11
Hi! I'm completely new to the site, but after watching the Unsolved Mysteries episode and reading some about the case, I thought I'd see if I could contribute anything to the discussion.
I think it could be worth talking more about the inconsistencies between the tv show and the accounts from Stansberry and another friend, from the article @fred&edna shared above (linking again for convenience:- Rey Rivera’s friend, former Baltimore employer pushes back on Netflix’s ‘Unsolved Mysteries'):
- Regarding the supposed "gag order" on Stansberry's employees: "He said only that employees were told to refer media inquiries to a spokesperson. He said he personally spoke with a detective on June 23, 2006, which was after Baier was reassigned and when another detective, Marvin Sydnor, had the case."
- Regarding the call that came from the Agora Publishing switchboard, the article notes that "Agora, a global publishing company headquartered in Baltimore, has several subsidiary companies, including Stanberry’s" and that Rey was also doing work with other Agora subsidiaries at the time-- he had changed from full-time to contract work with Stanberry 6 months earlier.
- Stanberry and another childhood friend reported that Rey was behaving strangely, that they were concerned about his mental state, and even that his wife shared their concerns.
- author Mikita Brottman was interviewed "for hours" for the show, but her interviews were not included; she contradicted the statement in the show that the hotel roof was hard to access.
The reason I find the omissions worrisome is because of another case covered on Netflix, that of Don Lewis on Tiger King. I recently listened to a more in-depth investigation by Paul Holes and Billy Jensen on their podcast (episode link here), and was shocked at how much the show manipulated and omitted in order to create the narrative they wanted. I'm not saying that's what's happening here, and I'm certainly not saying that I'd rule out any theories based on this. However, it does make me want to look for outside confirmation for some of the assertions from the show.
- Were there other worrying signs about Rey's mental state? Had he exhibited symptoms earlier in life, perhaps that were unacknowledged/overlooked (this definitely isn't uncommon)?
- How much was Rey involved with the case under SEC investigation? Even from the show, I got the impression that he wasn't at all.
- as for the glasses and phone not being broken-- this does seem unusual on the surface, but would someone with forensics (or physics) expertise be able to confirm? Is there a scenario where this could happen? I've seen too many examples where real life flies in the face of what we laypeople would expect.
- I know they said the injuries to his legs weren't consistent with a fall, but is there any information as to what they are consistent with? Did the ME conclude they definitely didn't come from a fall, or were they just inconclusive?
The thing that really sticks out to me is the missing money clip. Could there have been a robbery or something totally unconnected to the reason he went out there? Why would all his other personal items end up on that roof together, but the money clip is just gone?
I think it could be worth talking more about the inconsistencies between the tv show and the accounts from Stansberry and another friend, from the article @fred&edna shared above (linking again for convenience:- Rey Rivera’s friend, former Baltimore employer pushes back on Netflix’s ‘Unsolved Mysteries'):
- Regarding the supposed "gag order" on Stansberry's employees: "He said only that employees were told to refer media inquiries to a spokesperson. He said he personally spoke with a detective on June 23, 2006, which was after Baier was reassigned and when another detective, Marvin Sydnor, had the case."
- Regarding the call that came from the Agora Publishing switchboard, the article notes that "Agora, a global publishing company headquartered in Baltimore, has several subsidiary companies, including Stanberry’s" and that Rey was also doing work with other Agora subsidiaries at the time-- he had changed from full-time to contract work with Stanberry 6 months earlier.
- Stanberry and another childhood friend reported that Rey was behaving strangely, that they were concerned about his mental state, and even that his wife shared their concerns.
- author Mikita Brottman was interviewed "for hours" for the show, but her interviews were not included; she contradicted the statement in the show that the hotel roof was hard to access.
The reason I find the omissions worrisome is because of another case covered on Netflix, that of Don Lewis on Tiger King. I recently listened to a more in-depth investigation by Paul Holes and Billy Jensen on their podcast (episode link here), and was shocked at how much the show manipulated and omitted in order to create the narrative they wanted. I'm not saying that's what's happening here, and I'm certainly not saying that I'd rule out any theories based on this. However, it does make me want to look for outside confirmation for some of the assertions from the show.
- Were there other worrying signs about Rey's mental state? Had he exhibited symptoms earlier in life, perhaps that were unacknowledged/overlooked (this definitely isn't uncommon)?
- How much was Rey involved with the case under SEC investigation? Even from the show, I got the impression that he wasn't at all.
- as for the glasses and phone not being broken-- this does seem unusual on the surface, but would someone with forensics (or physics) expertise be able to confirm? Is there a scenario where this could happen? I've seen too many examples where real life flies in the face of what we laypeople would expect.
- I know they said the injuries to his legs weren't consistent with a fall, but is there any information as to what they are consistent with? Did the ME conclude they definitely didn't come from a fall, or were they just inconclusive?
The thing that really sticks out to me is the missing money clip. Could there have been a robbery or something totally unconnected to the reason he went out there? Why would all his other personal items end up on that roof together, but the money clip is just gone?