Zuckerschnecke
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2008
- Messages
- 646
- Reaction score
- 3,005
Q: Can you give us a sense why you are coming forward now?
JD: Uh, there is a few reasons why. Um, initially, the first few days, I was emotionally incapable of coming out to do an interview and I had been advised that, by coming on and doing an interview, by law enforcement, that it could possibly hinder the investigation. And, I'm here to help in any way I can, and by coming on here, it was in hopes of reaching out to the person that, that does have my daughter. To let them know that what you're doing isn't right, you may think what you're doing is right for Ayla. But it's not, you have no right. You're not her parent. She belongs home with her family.
It's part of the reason I'm coming on here today, in hopes of reaching out to the person that does have her.
I don't know anything about statement analysis, but the word does that JD inserted into his statement just gives me the feeling he knows who has her. Instead of saying the person that has her he says the person who does have her like it is fact and he knows who. JMO
I thought the SAME thing precisely. And how he said, "you're not her parent"...how does he know Trista didn't take her?
I stand by my feeling that he or someone in that house that night, knew about her filing for custody and decided to take the law into their own hands. The coincidence cannot be ignored and the fact there were other people in the house that night strikes me as also 'coincidental'.
The other thing is, whoever took her, probably didn't work on the weekend since she was missing on a Friday night. They had the whole weekend to go away from there, maybe even to Canada. I assume by now, the people there have all been accounted for but what about acquaintances of those that were there?