ME ME - Ayla Reynolds, 20 mnths, Waterville, 17 December 2011 - # 5

[cluciano63]

If one wants to be suspicious of every word Mom says, they will be suspicious; if one wants to do the same with Dad, so be it.

None of these suspicions are doing anything toward finding Ayla.

Hoping LE has more than suspicions. JMO

 

[NFYIAMY]

And what's up with this:

"Trista Reynolds said she would be willing to complete the test after treatment by a doctor, but added that investigators were content with the results of the incomplete test."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/19/trista-reynolds-lie-detector-test_n_1217099.html


If investigators are satisfied - WHY ISN'T SHE TELLING THE RESULTS?

 

[tlcya]

If one wants to be suspicious of every word Mom says, they will be suspicious; if one wants to do the same with Dad, so be it.

None of these suspicions are doing anything toward finding Ayla.

Hoping LE has more than suspicions. JMO

:goodpost:

 

[Detective Klimpt]

I guess this could fall into that:

"If MY child were missing....." posts often seen here. If MY child were missing and I made a huge deal out of taking a LDT - and a BIG deal that I would publicize the results (while eluding to the fact another person was being deceptive about their results) - if I had a medical condition that precluded me from taking the LDT - I wouldn't hesitate to give those details. It would be all about FINDING MY CHILD and making sure I was ruled out as a POI AND that everyone and their brother would be able to trust what I said because either I a) passed a LDT with flying colors or b) I was able to CONFIRM a medical condition that precluded me from passing the test.

(that above post is made very tongue in cheek)

I often just don't get the double standard in these forums depending on the person.

I also believe that in the PRE-TEST interview - health issues would've been brought up and addressed if necessary. Unless whomever was doing the test didn't know what they were doing......

JD took the test. Felt he passed it (or as he put it 'smoked it') and told LE to let the whole world see the results. (he can't MAKE them do it - so he can't be faulted for them NOT releasing the results)

TR said she was going to take a test - and WELL INTO the test stopped taking it for reasons UNCONFIRMED - and it's excused? Just like that?

JR has been torn apart for his 'smoked it' comment etc -- and TR gets sympathy because she SUPPOSEDLY didn't finish the test because of a medical problem. Really?

Uh-huh! Whether we would or she should, it really surprises me that she isn't revealing the reason. How can her medical condition be worse than her addiction(s) that we already know about. Weird. She's just whacky imo. And true, if this were JD the masses would be on him likes bees on honey. That all said, I am not interested in anything Trista has to say because in MOO she isn't involved in Ayla's disappearance and cannot provide any information to help get her back.

 

[cluciano63]

This is just my opinion, but if TR took Ayla or had her taken, Ayla has a far better chance of being alive, IMO, than if the Dad is the one with info (assuming either has info.) JMO. I don't believe she would have been taken by TR and then come to harm.

 

[NFYIAMY]

This is just my opinion, but if TR took Ayla or had her taken, Ayla has a far better chance of being alive, IMO, than if the Dad is the one with info (assuming either has info.) JMO. I don't believe she would have been taken by TR and then come to harm.

I kinda think that if EITHER of the parents are responsible for taking her that she is alive and being cared for somewhere. I believe that if either of them are responsible - it is attached to the custody issue......

With that being said - there's been so much time since she went missing that it would make if beyond difficult for either parent come forward with her --- as this has national attention - and well, how exactly do you figure your way out of what you've done at this point? I also believe that if either of the parents were involved - SOMEONE somewhere would've said something by now (because there has to at least one person involved keeping her - and well, it would be tough for it to not to be found out by SOMEONE else [ie: if someone suddenly was caring for a child out of the blue.....someone would be like "who's that?"] KWIM?

I am very interested in the GF now (according to the website - she's WAY different then I was thinking) ---- and what her relationship was with her sister (have we CONFIRMED that it was her sister who was arrested on the drug charges?) Drug dealers/Baby Selling/Lowlife people + Beautiful blue eyed baby girl = disastrous potential (imoo)

 

[cityslick]

I guess this could fall into that:

"If MY child were missing....." posts often seen here. If MY child were missing and I made a huge deal out of taking a LDT - and a BIG deal that I would publicize the results (while eluding to the fact another person was being deceptive about their results) - if I had a medical condition that precluded me from taking the LDT - I wouldn't hesitate to give those details. It would be all about FINDING MY CHILD and making sure I was ruled out as a POI AND that everyone and their brother would be able to trust what I said because either I a) passed a LDT with flying colors or b) I was able to CONFIRM a medical condition that precluded me from passing the test.

(that above post is made very tongue in cheek)

I often just don't get the double standard in these forums depending on the person.

I also believe that in the PRE-TEST interview - health issues would've been brought up and addressed if necessary. Unless whomever was doing the test didn't know what they were doing......

JD took the test. Felt he passed it (or as he put it 'smoked it') and told LE to let the whole world see the results. (he can't MAKE them do it - so he can't be faulted for them NOT releasing the results)

TR said she was going to take a test - and WELL INTO the test stopped taking it for reasons UNCONFIRMED - and it's excused? Just like that?

JR has been torn apart for his 'smoked it' comment etc -- and TR gets sympathy because she SUPPOSEDLY didn't finish the test because of a medical problem. Really?

BBM

I hate to quote my own post, but I think it's relevant. It probably will answer your 'really' comment.

If a child goes missing under your watch, you're not going to get the benefit of the doubt, either here or in the general public. It doesn't matter what you do, you could be a saint and it won't matter, the cloud of suspicion will always be with you. I don't understand when people say 'they should be doing this or that' because it's not going to matter, if you think someone has something to do with it, nothing they do is going to change your mind. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, the same exact thing happened in the Smart and Lunsford cases.

 

[Detective Klimpt]

I am very interested in the GF now (according to the website - she's WAY different then I was thinking) <respectfully snipped>

Why, because she is going to college? Educated people get involved in drugs, not just low-life people.

I'm hopeful that LE is on to something in this case. As of now, I would be looking at information about that car that pulled up to the house in the middle of the night. That may suggest that Ayla was put into that car (dead or alive) and taken (perhaps) to Belgrade (or worse).

There may be a handful of abductions that are strangers and where the child is found alive, but I think that is a very, very low percentage. I fear Ayla and BL are no longer alive.

 

[Donjeta]

I completely agree with this. In fact, I don't feel that anyone should feel obliged to go public with anything at all. However, TR has very publicly and very vehemently questioned every action and non-action taken by JD in this case. She has been seen an heard many times asking "why won't he say this? and why won't he reveal this? why won't he talk about this? why? why? why?" All I'm saying is that maybe she shouldn't hold others to a standard to which she herself is not willing to uphold.

JMO, I haven't seen her holding anybody to a standard that demands they reveal their medical history. She just wants to know what happened to Ayla and I can't fault her for that.

 

[lauriej]

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46070009/ns/today-today_people/

Missing toddler's mom: 'I think she's alive and holding on'

--Today Show----Jan.20/2012

 

[tamild]

JMO, I haven't seen her holding anybody to a standard that demands they reveal their medical history. She just wants to know what happened to Ayla and I can't fault her for that.

Agreed. It's just my hope that what she takes from her own, personal experience is that sometimes there are perfectly valid reasons why one would not publicly disclose personal information, and that this idea extends to others, as well as herself. JMO

 

[Donjeta]

Agreed. It's just my hope that what she takes from her own, personal experience is that sometimes there are perfectly valid reasons why one would not publicly disclose personal information, and that this idea extends to others, as well as herself. JMO

She is Ayla's mother and I think it gives her the right to ask questions.
I would think it was extremely strange if she did not.

Everyone is free to answer her questions or leave them alone if they'd rather not.

:cow:

 

[Donjeta]

--from the 'What You Can Do' page.

http://www.thislittlelightofmaine.com/what-you-can-do.html

There are several things that each of us can do to help.

Read the blog: A beacon of hope and feel free to share it via email or facebook, or elsewhere, with your friends.

So I guess she thinks it's OK to share the link but she doesn't want to be quoted without permission?

 

[cluciano63]

Donations for Ayla? For what purpose?

 

[lauriej]

So I guess she thinks it's OK to share the link but she doesn't want to be quoted without permission?

--i don't see the "don't quote me etc..." message on the site anymore.

 

[Donjeta]

--i don't see the "don't quote me etc..." message on the site anymore.

It's still there in a post dated 12/30/2011.

I've seen similar wordings on other blogs. Everybody wants to own their words I guess so that's not odd to me that people ask not to be quoted without permission (and being given proper credit for their words I suppose). I'm just not sure what it means that she doesn't want the information used.

 

[Helenstreet]

I completely agree with this. In fact, I don't feel that anyone should feel obliged to go public with anything at all. However, TR has very publicly and very vehemently questioned every action and non-action taken by JD in this case. She has been seen an heard many times asking "why won't he say this? and why won't he reveal this? why won't he talk about this? why? why? why?" All I'm saying is that maybe she shouldn't hold others to a standard to which she herself is not willing to uphold.

I can completely understand why TR would not reveal her 'medical condition' to the public. Really, what does her medical history have to do with this case at all? Is knowing the gossipy details of TR's medical issues or possible drug issues going to bring Ayla home? I believe that TR has the right to expect JD to communicate with her regarding Ayla because her child mysteriously disappeared while in his care. Then, there is also the matter that JD didn't take Ayla to her medical appointment the day before she disappeared or allow Trista to have contact with Ayla prior to her disappearance. I would think that JD has had plenty of opportunity to dispute and address these allegations in the media if they are not true. Further, the majority of the questions TR addressed publicly towards JD regarding Ayla's disappearance were made during the 2 1/2 week time period in which he wasn't, (noticeably at least), pleading to the public for his daughter's safe return at all. From what I have observed, TR has been upfront about everything, including the polygraph test that she participated in. Unlike statements JD made to the media regarding his polygraph results--which were publicly contradicted by law enforcement--I have not observed any public contradiction of TR's statements by law enforcement. Actually, from my perspective, TR has shown a lot of restraint regarding JD. Personally, if one of my children disappeared while in the care of my husband or ex-husband, I would hold him completely accountable, and I would be outraged if a member of his family lied to the public regarding whether or not they were present in the home when my child disappeared. This is just MOHO.

 

[NFYIAMY]

Why, because she is going to college? Educated people get involved in drugs, not just low-life people.

I'm hopeful that LE is on to something in this case. As of now, I would be looking at information about that car that pulled up to the house in the middle of the night. That may suggest that Ayla was put into that car (dead or alive) and taken (perhaps) to Belgrade (or worse).

There may be a handful of abductions that are strangers and where the child is found alive, but I think that is a very, very low percentage. I fear Ayla and BL are no longer alive.

Not necessarily because she's in college - but because it *appears* (wether she uses drugs or not) that she is in different place by far than her sister? It's not like she's pursuing her AA or BA/BS but rather working on her Masters. Could she be a drug dealer, too? Possibly but they just *seem* to be in two very different places in life......

~~~~~~
Now - back to this: Why isn't Trista disclosing the results of her LDT? She said that INVESTIGATORS were satisfied with the results - sooo WHY isn't she telling what it was they were satisfied with??

She's talking out both sides of her mouth (MOO) -- I didn't finish the test because of a medical problem/Investigators are satisfied with the results

Either there are results or there aren't. Either she passed, she failed, or it was inconclusive.

 

[cluciano63]

Not necessarily because she's in college - but because it *appears* (wether she uses drugs or not) that she is in different place by far than her sister? It's not like she's pursuing her AA or BA/BS but rather working on her Masters. Could she be a drug dealer, too? Possibly but they just *seem* to be in two very different places in life......

~~~~~~
Now - back to this: Why isn't Trista disclosing the results of her LDT? She said that INVESTIGATORS were satisfied with the results - sooo WHY isn't she telling what it was they were satisfied with??

She's talking out both sides of her mouth (MOO) -- I didn't finish the test because of a medical problem/Investigators are satisfied with the results

Either there are results or there aren't. Either she passed, she failed, or it was inconclusive.

Or...she didn't finish taking it, as she said. And they may not have scored it, who knows. I think if LE wanted a LD test out of her, it would have been done weeks ago, JMO.

 

[HiHater]

I kinda think that if EITHER of the parents are responsible for taking her that she is alive and being cared for somewhere. I believe that if either of them are responsible - it is attached to the custody issue......

With that being said - there's been so much time since she went missing that it would make if beyond difficult for either parent come forward with her --- as this has national attention - and well, how exactly do you figure your way out of what you've done at this point? I also believe that if either of the parents were involved - SOMEONE somewhere would've said something by now (because there has to at least one person involved keeping her - and well, it would be tough for it to not to be found out by SOMEONE else [ie: if someone suddenly was caring for a child out of the blue.....someone would be like "who's that?"] KWIM?

I am very interested in the GF now (according to the website - she's WAY different then I was thinking) ---- and what her relationship was with her sister (have we CONFIRMED that it was her sister who was arrested on the drug charges?) Drug dealers/Baby Selling/Lowlife people + Beautiful blue eyed baby girl = disastrous potential (imoo)

Since this case has national attention now, IF either parent has her it will be a lonnggggg time before she resurfaces. The case will have to go cold IMO. It wouldn't be hard to keep a child this young out of site out of mind if a distant relative has her...