Going to put this out there knowing that it might not be popular…but:
Anytime a fully clothed older male is found in the range of 30 miles off shore I believe that legitimate burial at sea should be not ruled out. Significantly, such as with this case, when autopsy finds numerous disease processes active at time of death.
Granted, this gentleman was not found fully clothed, but being in the Gulf of Maine long enough to become partially skeletonized answers why that is.
I submit that this UID’s chronic heart, lung and kidney diseases would make the demanding job of fisherman difficult for someone so compromised, and I don’t believe that he died on the job. It is possible of course that he had lived a sea-going life, even having been a fishing boat owner, or a boat captain.
The clothing brands he was found in were utilitarian, as someone said, like those the Port Authority would mandate for employees. Maybe not something a paying cruise passenger might choose to pack for their vacation, or that most landlubbers would choose to wear on their final voyage.
Unless of course, nothing better represented the maritime life that this man chose to live, and his family knew best. Perhaps they thought it most fitting for him to wear his work clothes on his final day at sea.
BTW, here’s the EPA Burial at Sea Report that can be filled out after the fact. Seems rather…loosey-goosey, no?
It would be great if someone knew how to access reports on where, and how many burials at sea were reported for 2000?
Burial at Sea Report (BASR) | Burial at Sea Reporting System | US EPA