Well, let's see here...Moo. Squirrels are edible, and considered game...moo
Moo...well as RedHaus informative narrative says squirrel hunting season does not start till September in Maine. So no, he was hunting out of season. Hunting squirrels can be done with small caliber gun (air gun or BB gun) but doubt he would use gun at family campground. But slingshots, blowguns and arrows are also used. Guess you would need to ask his family about if they have BBQ'd any squirrels recently. I know people hunt squirrels but I am surprised there is a hunting season for them, didn't realize they were that popular. I think he would probably use slingshot. ...mooWas he eating them? Hunting them legally and humanely? I think not.
RSBMI know people hunt squirrels but I am surprised there is a hunting season for them, didn't realize they were that popular. I think he would probably use slingshot. ...moo
Moo..na people definitely hunt squirrels for food...tastes like chicken but gamey. People that hunt are not more likely to be human killers.Someone who kills animals for entertainment rather than for food is cruel and sadistic imo, not sure what else to call that. Edited to add: lots of people hunt in Maine, and they eat what they hunt. Don't know anyone who eats squirrels unless they are desperately poor.
Moo..na people definitely hunt squirrels for food...tastes like chicken but gamey. People that hunt are not more likely to be human killers.
But if he was setting snares, I can imagine Sunny may have followed him and questioned him. That would put them both on island.....moo
To my knowledge no forensic or dna evidence has been released by MSP to the public.What is the actual physical evidence the supports Young as being the killer? I see a lot of maybes and character flaws being tossed around freely, but nothing in the way of hard or even compelling evidence.....this near presumption of guilt so early in an investigation by the public is alarming.
What is the actual physical evidence the supports Young as being the killer? I see a lot of maybes and character flaws being tossed around freely, but nothing in the way of hard or even compelling evidence.....this near presumption of guilt so early in an investigation by the public is alarming.
Yes, I read that DNA samples were taken, largely volunteered, by males in the campground relevant to the timeframe.We won’t know the actual evidence used for the arrest until the arrest affidavit is released.
What we do know is there was an arrest affidavit, put together by LE/ investigators, and presented to a judge, and that judge thought LE presented enough evidence for probable cause.
So LE was given an arrest warrant- and he was arrested.
I think since they collected DNA, they have a match to his.
He should have counsel now
Appears before a judge, gives a plea
Grand jury is convening to investigate and see if there is enough evidence for charges or not
Will he get to post bond and get out pending the investigation, or stay in custody?
He isn’t a flight risk, but he is dangerous
I think this is correct process, correct me if I’m wrong
IMO
Just a reminder that any source of DNA indicates male or female. It doesn't need to be semen.Yes, I read that DNA samples were taken, largely volunteered, by males in the campground relevant to the timeframe.
It's unclear if Young's DNA sample was given before or after his arrest, though a positive DNA match doesn't, in itself, necessarily prove guilt.
So far, authorities haven't said what the DNA in question was found in, though since men were the focus of DNA collection by police, I'm thinking there was a sexual component to this murder. That is, the sample at crime scene was from something implicating a male killer.
Though that's just my own suspicion!
Thanks for posting @RedHaus -A few new tidbits in this morning's article.
1. "According to the campground owner, the teen took police in the opposite direction to where Stewart was found and led them on a “wild goose chase.”"
2. "Young, who was arraigned last week, has been held at a youth detention facility in the Portland area “to prevent the juvenile from inflicting bodily harm on others,” Judge Eric Walker ruled Friday."
3. "That evening [7/2/2025], Lunt said she spotted Stewart’s friend searching the waterfront by flashlight, prompting the campground owner to check the area out."
4. ""Maybe she had been hit by a boat,” Lunt speculated. “We had no idea why she hadn’t returned.”"
![]()
‘Polite’ teen joined search for slain paddleboarder. Now police say he’s the killer
Deven Young, 17, sent police on a ‘wild goose chase’ in the search for Sunshine Stewart’s killer, James Liddell writes. Then, he was charged with her murderwww.independent.co.uk
ETA: quotation marks.
Yes, indeed.Thanks for posting @RedHaus -
"That evening, Lunt said she spotted Stewart's friend searching the waterfront by flashlight, prompting the campground owner to check the area out.
IIRC Stewarts friend was supposedly the one who called her in missing in the early info I saw/heard then we heard nothing about a friend being there at the campground except at the intital registration at camp . Interesting that indeed her friend was there. We don't have a name for that particular friend afaik.
Murder on Crawford Pond: The chilling timeline of Sunny Stewart’s final days
"In the early hours of July 3, two local residents found a paddleboard, which led responders to Stewart’s body."
Hopefully LE know the names of the locals and grabbed their dna etc so no confusion - I had not read this before that locals found her board
"Police combed through evidence for almost two weeks at the campground. Lunt said she became “obsessed” with finding the murder suspect and scoured through hours of surveillance tapes and rallied campers to offer up footage and provide their DNA."
Lunt also mentions in the article that Devon was back on shore before dark so if we are taking Lunt's info as true - Sunny was murdered between 6pm and approx 9pm ish.
For me, it's important to remember what is MSP/Court doc info vs what is Katherine Lunt the campground info - most of what we know and most of what this article quotes in Per Lunt- who has an obvious vested interest/bias in this case -.
Either way it will all become clear and we will have more info from court and the authorities soon.
JMO