gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,497
- Reaction score
- 231,458
More and more of the research is indicating that autism has a genetic etiology and that it begins manifesting during gestation.
The only reason it rears its ugly head around the time of vaccination is because vaccination often occurs at the same time as one would expect to see autism being expressed in a child. It's a coincidence of timing.
Anecdotes do not data make. One can also find anecdotes of families with a child who became autistic after receiving vaccines, withheld them for the next child, only to find out that the second child is autistic. I can think of two actual acquaintances right off the top of my head. Research has been done by people all over the world, not just by US pharma and medical interests and has shown no link to vaccines.
The original study which gave new life to the anti vaccine movement had 12 subjects. Only 12. Forgetting for a moment that it turned out the author of this study was found to have committed multiple ethical and scientific method breaches, 12 subjects in any study can AT MOST simply indicate the need for more study. One certainly cannot draw any solid conclusions off a study with so few subjects. More studies should be done and the results MUST be replicated numerous times before one can get a sense that the results are clinically significant. It simply hasn't happened.
BBM. Yeah, I'm actually not buying that. The symptoms of serious autism are apparent in infants and toddlers up to the age of the first vaccine. They do not point. They do not make a lot of eye contact, or use many words typically. They don't do things like play peek-a-boo or mimic facial expressions. Those symptoms do not suddenly appear. They are always there.
Except in cases of what is called "regressive autism". Regressive autism makes up about a third of all autism cases. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22855372
What the people who believe vaccines caused their kid's autism are discussing is regressive autism. In other words, a totally healthy child developing completely normally, pointing, calling for a parent's attention, developing a significant and good vocabulary of words, interacting with parents, snuggling, laughing in response to facial expressions or raspberries, etc., suddenly stops doing all of that and becomes a morose, isolated child, unable to speak or interact, with a host of bowel issues, often with roseola,suddenly stimming and completely lost to the world.
And these anecdotes do not describe children who develop these symptoms some time after the MMR vaccine. They describe children who immediately react to the vaccine by becoming listless and feverish and then immediately begin losing words, within a day or two of the vaccine and immediately regress. Not weeks nor months. Days.
I have read account after account and watched video after video, that show exactly what the parents claim. Normal, healthy kid developing normally who suddenly doesn't only stop developing but regresses to non-verbal and unable to interact.
I think it is rare. I think the possibility that there is a connection and if so, the risk of it occurring, does not outweigh even closely, the benefit of the vaccines. But to make blanket statements that totally dismiss
the reality for the parents affected or to repeat pronouncements that may not actually be accurate, is to create further distrust and alienate certain populations more.
IMO!