they asked him if his sarcastic tone could have hurt. he said no. that just shows me his ego's too big....to not recognize that it helps to have the jury like you.
[/B]
RBBM
I agree!!!
If the Jury didn't understand the law and how to apply it WHY in the name of all thing Holy, Didn't they ASK HHJP!!!!!
Knock on the door and ask to have it clarified!!!
And if the Anthony's think it is so FAIR, maybe the LE need to go arrest GA for his involvement...
I Still think ALL of the Anthony's and JB conned us.... From 6 weeks before trial on...
And it worked!
Ashton has the class to come on after it's over. He knows & cares that we want to know what happened IMHO.
The juror never said they didn't like JA. I found him lovable.
yes, you are right....it was a question based on opinions of a segment of non-jurors who watched the trial. I heard that it was obvious in the courtroom that the jurors liked Baez - responded warmly to his "good mornings".
If he can find peace with it, then I think the rest of us can too.
I have heard a lot of people in the last day say that the defense will hit the media scene. Sorry for my ignorance, I've only followed this during the trial. are you saying Baez and Mason made the media circuit during the trial or before? I never saw them on tv. Guess I never see anything wrong with it since you pick a jury supposedly who hasn't followed the case, right>?
Best thing JA said..."that the Caylee supporters at the courthouse got very weird at times - like they were at a sporting event."
The only worthwhile part of his interview on HLN was the ire and passion he incited in Vinnie Politan. Vinnie was O.U.T.R.A.G.E.D and almost seemed flabbergasted at this guy's responses.
I completely agree with those of you who found all his "we" and "our" responses hinky. There is no "we" or "our" when you are an alternate.
He will be the first to write a book about the trial.