- Joined
- Apr 6, 2010
- Messages
- 10,467
- Reaction score
- 69,778
We are here for you @Summerliz03 . I'm so sorry that you are having to deal with this.As an American, I can say it’s sad to see it happening from the inside too.
We are here for you @Summerliz03 . I'm so sorry that you are having to deal with this.As an American, I can say it’s sad to see it happening from the inside too.
Agree...but still not sad to see him go.
But who will they replace him with? Someone who hates humanity even worse?
"Peaceful Protest", Yes. Bringing a gun to a "Peaceful Protest'. No.
The article doesn’t say that he financed any anti Israeli groups. There are several groups involved in the anti-ICE protests, not all funded by George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Indivisible Twin Cities is separate from the Council on American-Islamic Relations. imo
From the link -
In addition to Indivisible Twin Cities — which does not identify its leaders on its website — other protest leaders include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an anti-Israel group whose Minnesota chapter’s executive director Jaylani Hussein has rallied against ICE at protests.
Re the bolded sentence...this is the sort of thing I'd normally consider a comment only made by conspiracy theorists or people who are in the panic moments of the immediate aftermath of a shocking event. Extreme things can be said by anyone in the heat of the moment and they should be understood in context.![]()
Trump AGREES to pull ICE agents out of Minnesota, governor says
Donald Trump has agreed to pull ICE agents out of Minnesota and allow local police to investigate the shooting of a protester by federal agents, Governor Tim Walz has said.www.dailymail.co.uk
Vermont Governor Phil Scott joined a growing number of GOP lawmakers outraged by the shooting of Pretti.
'At best, these federal immigration operations are a complete failure of coordination of acceptable public safety and law enforcement practices, training, and leadership,' the Republican wrote on X.
'At worst, it's a deliberate federal intimidation and incitement of American citizens that's resulting in the murder of Americans. Again, enough is enough.'
Senator Pete Ricketts, a close ally of the President, called for a 'prioritized, transparent investigation.'
'My support for funding ICE remains the same,' the Nebraska Republican, who is up for reelection, said online. 'But we must also maintain our core values as a nation, including the right to protest and assemble.
IMO it seems the polling numbers/ protesting/mounting R backlash etc have convinced T to do an about face in Minnesota but of course claim victory. I think too little too late - the damage has been done on an domestic and international stage.
Tom Homan has been highly effective as a member of both the Obama and Trump administrations with regard to immigration enforcement. In 2015, he received Obama's Presidential Rank Award, the highest civil service honor in the U.S. for his immigration enforcement and deportation achievements as Obama's ICE chief. Beyond messaging, he gets things done.Whoever Bovino's replacement may be, Tom Homan will likely be sure that it is someone who will be better at the "messaging".
I will let others read for themselves what he thinks the messaging should be (in the article).
White House Border Czar Tom Homan said the unpopularity of Immigration and Customs Enforcement is due to a “messaging” problem.
Homan appeared on Thursday’s edition of The Ingraham Angle on Fox News, where the host cited polls showing ICE with lackluster support among the American people.
By a margin of 51% to 31%, Americans say ICE’s actions are making cities less safe rather than safer.
![]()
Tom Homan Says ICE Is Unpopular Because ‘We Need to Be Better at Messaging’
White House Border Czar Tom Homan said the unpopularity of Immigration and Customs Enforcement is due to a "messaging" problem.www.yahoo.com
SBMAlex Pretty was returning from a shift. He was carrying a concealed weapon which is legal according to the laws of his state.
Tom Homan has been highly effective as a member of both the Obama and Trump administrations with regard to immigration enforcement. In 2015, he received Obama's Presidential Rank Award, the highest civil service honor in the U.S. for his immigration enforcement and deportation achievements as Obama's ICE chief. Beyond messaging, he gets things done.
If Walz and Frey go forward as partners in good faith, I am sure he can work with the federal agents to successfully continue their mission.Yes, I am aware of his history.
Let's hope he can change things up enough to restore peace to Minneapolis. He likely hasn't yet had to deal with anything that has received so much push-back from so many.
imo
...and so sad to live from the inside.I feel like the US has morphed into an alternate and very gloomy reality and its so sad to watch from the outside![]()
Anyone ever read The Diary of Anne Frank?
When I look at the footage I see a man go to help a woman who's been shoved. I then see him pepper sprayed, beaten up and shot to death.In my opinion, the actions of the agents who killed Alex Pretti show they:
1. Did not view him or the two women as human beings. They were "the enemy." They had been dehumanized by the rhetoric from the administration and DHS leadership.
2. Were taking their anger out on the two women and then Pretti. Like a pack of dogs that is thwarted in taking down a victim, they turn on the next available target. They were enraged that the Donut shop locked them out, and viewed anyone who was in the area protesting as the problem.
3. Were so narrow minded and focused on the two women and Pretti being what was wrong, as did the agents who killed Renee Good. She was in their way, she had been on their nerves for a good bit of time (20 minutes, perhaps?). Alex and the two women were the reason they didn't get their target, in their view.
In my opinion, the actions of Alex Pretti show he:
1. Wanted to witness the Agents' actions and record them.
2. Did not want to stand down or give the agents an inch, as some photos show him not flinching as an agent stood close enough to see his nose hairs, staring Alex down.
3. Automatically stepped toward the women to help and protect them. I imagine that it was not possible for him NOT to help them.
4. Never expected to die. Like Renee, thought the constitution still protected him.
If Walz and Frey go forward as partners in good faith, I am sure he can work with the federal agents to successfully continue their mission.
When I look at the footage I see a man go to help a woman who's been shoved. I then see him pepper sprayed, beaten up and shot to death.
But some people are seeing people getting in the way of LE trying to apprehend violent criminals. That is what the job of ICE is supposed to be, isn't it?
Could we all try and step back and realise that neither of these two perspectives is 100% incorrect, and that people seeing it from the other side are not bad people?
Please explain to me how a man who had his back to ICE agents while he was helping two women who had been pushed to the ground and pepper sprayed by ICE, inserted himself into the situation. The 'situation' as you call it only occurred when the agents gang piled on him hitting him repeatedly on the head with a gas cannister and grappling with him while he was protecting himself from the blows. During that melee an ICE agent saw his weapon and removed it. In seconds he was dead. He didn't insert himself in anything other than trying to be a good human. Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept. I have a question about authority and who can use it and who must comply. It's a tricky question because authority can either be used as a cudgel to coerce and control or a staff to govern and protect all. What do you see in the attachment? No one stood up for these people when those in authority came for them.My opinion. During the tussle, an agent removed his firearm, upon bringing it up and away from those present, for some reason it discharged. That Sig is known for accidental discharge, or the agent accidentally fired the weapon in the heat of the moment. That negligent discharge is part of what started the rest of the shooting.
Also, it's possible when the agent disarmed the man, in the chaos, another agent saw the weapon and not realizing who held it, yelled "gun". That, in conjunction with the negligent discharge, set the ball rolling.
My opinion. Had the armed man not inserted himself in to the situation he'd be alive today.
Out of respect for representatives of the U.S. Holocaust Museum, I think it would be best not to compare the Holocaust with the deportation of illegal immigrants in the U.S., per the wishes of the leadership of the U.S. Holocaust Museum, as posted in an article above.Please explain to me how a man who had his back to ICE agents while he was helping two women who had been pushed to the ground and pepper sprayed by ICE, inserted himself into the situation. The 'situation' as you call it only occurred when the agents gang piled on him hitting him repeatedly on the head with a gas cannister and grappling with him while he was protecting himself from the blows. During that melee an ICE agent saw his weapon and removed it. In seconds he was dead. He didn't insert himself in anything other than trying to be a good human. Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept. I have a question about authority and who can use it and who must comply. It's a tricky question because authority can either be used as a cudgel to coerce and control or a staff to govern and protect all. What do you see in the attachment? No one stood up for these people when those in authority came for them.