- Joined
- Jul 30, 2004
- Messages
- 6,761
- Reaction score
- 17,026
I will.If they do not have DNA on this Jane Doe it might take a long time to see if there is a match.That's a beautiful picture, Suzanne. Please let us know what the LE contact says.
I will.If they do not have DNA on this Jane Doe it might take a long time to see if there is a match.That's a beautiful picture, Suzanne. Please let us know what the LE contact says.
I will.If they do not have DNA on this Jane Doe it might take a long time to see if there is a match.
Here's a new NamUs MP case out of Michigan.
Margie Ann Ranshaw
![]()
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/14788/3
The heights are a little off. But I am a little suspicious of the accuracy of the Jane Doe's height estimate. She was originally listed at 55 inches (i.e., 4'7"), and then when I e-mailed them to say that this was quite short for an adult female, they changed it to 60 inches (i.e., 5'0"). If they had originally meant to say 5 feet 5 inches, and mistated it as 55 inches, then the heights would be consistent.
Aside from that - the age, circumstances, location, and timeframe are pretty consistent, and she has a reasonable resemblance to the recon.
![]()
![]()
I would say to submit her, you and me both know how they can be wrong whe it comes to heights of both the missing and the UID's.
Here's a new NamUs MP case out of Michigan.
Margie Ann Ranshaw
https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/14788/3
The heights are a little off. But I am a little suspicious of the accuracy of the Jane Doe's height estimate. She was originally listed at 55 inches (i.e., 4'7"), and then when I e-mailed them to say that this was quite short for an adult female, they changed it to 60 inches (i.e., 5'0"). If they had originally meant to say 5 feet 5 inches, and mistated it as 55 inches, then the heights would be consistent.
Aside from that - the age, circumstances, location, and timeframe are pretty consistent, and she has a reasonable resemblance to the recon.
![]()
![]()
I just e-mailed Trooper Krebs to ask if this possible match is (or was) on their radar.
Carl, we are getting DNA on Margie's side now. The case is new to us, the UP DNA is already at UNT.
That's strange. It says 2 months as the postmortem interval, but then says that estimated time of death is 1985-1988.
I did just send an e-mail to Trooper Krebs, Rose Sacchetti, and Norman Sauer.
I'm trying to get a hold of LE now to see if they are getting DNA on this Jane Doe.I think she looks a little like this picture of my sister Tammy.
![]()
I want this Jane Doe checked with her.