MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
I live less than 2 hours away from Farmington Hills/Southfield and often travel in that direction for work. Every time I'm on I-75 heading toward that area, my eyes wander to the ditches along the sides of the road, like I'm going to find something useful from my car on the highway. I was traveling that way yesterday and I started to think how it just doesn't make sense to me that they haven't had any searches for Danielle. They'd have to have some pretty concrete evidence that it would be a waste of manpower do any ground searching, wouldn't they?

I don't think larger bodies of water were frozen in early December. It hadn't really been that cold yet. We had a few cold, snowy days, but not many. I could be wrong there.

I agree completely with you! They would definitely need concrete evidence or at the bare minimum, very compelling evidence to feel it was a waste of resources and manpower to search!
 
Even in December?

I would think she would be above ground and not in water.

My next logical question is why are they not doing ground searches? Boggles the mind. There are ways to grid off areas and do careful responsible searches. It's warm, it's clear as the brush has not grown back in. Seems like now is the time.
It was very warm here on December 2nd. Just an FYI.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
Even in December?

I would think she would be above ground and not in water.

My next logical question is why are they not doing ground searches? Boggles the mind. There are ways to grid off areas and do careful responsible searches. It's warm, it's clear as the brush has not grown back in. Seems like now is the time.

While I have no basis for this, I do think it's possible that LE has been conducting ground and/or water searches but without help from the public.

Farmington Hills police chief Chuck Nebus released a statement on Dec. 23. In it, he said, "Farmington Hills detectives and investigators from several other agencies have been involved in searches and the collection of evidence at numerous locations over the past three weeks." (BBM)

The only search location I am aware of is the house in Berkley in which SG lived.

Whether SG had anything to do with the crime, it is easy to assume that LE is keeping a close watch on him; however, no one is yet in custody. It would make sense to me that LE would be very careful not to disclose search locations, when there is still a possibility of someone being tipped off and interfering or tampering with potential evidence.

I have no idea how many people know where Danielle is, but if more than one, especially, it may be difficult for LE to identify and keep an eye on every single one of them 24/7. With enough probable cause, they may be allowed to monitor someone's communication with others, but more than ever, there are so many ways to get in touch with someone. Also, what if someone is staying at a location with phone or internet service in another person's name, and/or access to someone else's cell phone? Possibilities are endless.

IMO, it's not entirely inconceivable that perhaps LE, at one point, was able to track Danielle's -or her cell phone's- movements for Dec. 2nd and 3rd, and followed pings, etc., but she and/or the phone had already been moved. It's not entirely inconceivable that someone who may or may not be on LE's radar right now would try to plant some random DNA near Danielle in order to raise enough reasonable doubt.

LE has been so unusually tight-lipped about everything with regard to this case, and I really don't believe it's due to lack of evidence. I can't help but think there must be something unique to this case that makes it absolutely necessary for LE to operate in this manner.

Source: http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2016/12...ills-woman-brings-police-to-house-in-berkley/
 
Happy 29th Birthday Danielle! :bdscroll:
I had hoped you would be home in time for today, but it's only a matter of time, right? :heartbeat:

I got my "Dani Ribbon" on today.

attachment.php

Seconding that! Praying she is found soon​.
 

Attachments

  • BurgundyCandle.jpg
    BurgundyCandle.jpg
    6.4 KB · Views: 57
While I have no basis for this, I do think it's possible that LE has been conducting ground and/or water searches but without help from the public.

Farmington Hills police chief Chuck Nebus released a statement on Dec. 23. In it, he said, "Farmington Hills detectives and investigators from several other agencies have been involved in searches and the collection of evidence at numerous locations over the past three weeks." (BBM)

The only search location I am aware of is the house in Berkley in which SG lived.

Whether SG had anything to do with the crime, it is easy to assume that LE is keeping a close watch on him; however, no one is yet in custody. It would make sense to me that LE would be very careful not to disclose search locations, when there is still a possibility of someone being tipped off and interfering or tampering with potential evidence.

I have no idea how many people know where Danielle is, but if more than one, especially, it may be difficult for LE to identify and keep an eye on every single one of them 24/7. With enough probable cause, they may be allowed to monitor someone's communication with others, but more than ever, there are so many ways to get in touch with someone. Also, what if someone is staying at a location with phone or internet service in another person's name, and/or access to someone else's cell phone? Possibilities are endless.

IMO, it's not entirely inconceivable that perhaps LE, at one point, was able to track Danielle's -or her cell phone's- movements for Dec. 2nd and 3rd, and follow pings, etc., but she and/or the phone had already been moved. It's not entirely inconceivable that someone who may or may not be on LE's radar right now would try to plant some random DNA near Danielle in order to raise enough reasonable doubt.

LE has been so unusually tight-lipped about everything with regard to this case, and I really don't believe it's due to lack of evidence. I can't help but think there must be something unique to this case that makes it absolutely necessary for LE to operate in this manner.

Source: http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2016/12...ills-woman-brings-police-to-house-in-berkley/
I concur. Something unique (not human trafficking) enough to involve 12 agencies including the DEA, Mich. department of corrections, sonic, etc. there is definitely something bigger to this case.
 
I haven't posted here in a while.... still watching, still reading, still hoping she is found safe .

:heartbeat::heartbeat::heartbeat::heartbeat::heartbeat:
 
How is it not victim friendly to know who the police suspect did it? How does knowing someone who had their house searched and property taken make me be the one creating rumors, the person I know is in fact the SG they have been doing this too.
Rest assured we all know who this person is and have since very early on. We just cannot discuss his name until he is officially named as a poi.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
 
How is it not victim friendly to know who the police suspect did it? How does knowing someone who had their house searched and property taken make me be the one creating rumors, the person I know is in fact the SG they have been doing this too.

No offense but that is not news in here ..everything you mention was discussed a month ago or more.
 
Thoughts with Danielle's family today. I can't imagine how difficult it was for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Does everyone on here live near where it happened, doubtful dear. Guess what I don't spend my days reading forums and reading through 11 threads full of pages of info like some people. Clearly I am a new user and have no idea what has been discussed and your welcome has been disgusting, condescending and extremely rude.

Actually quite a few and we have a VI
 
Does everyone on here live near where it happened, doubtful dear. Guess what I don't spend my days reading forums and reading through 11 threads full of pages of info like some people. Clearly I am a new user and have no idea what has been discussed and your welcome has been disgusting, condescending and extremely rude.
I live in the area, too. Lots of locals on here, actually. I don't think that us as locals know much more than anyone else. :)

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
How is it not victim friendly to know who the police suspect did it? How does knowing someone who had their house searched and property taken make me be the one creating rumors, the person I know is in fact the SG they have been doing this too.
The police need to actually say that he is a suspect. They have implied it with hints here and there, but he isn't actually considered a suspect as of right now.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 
Well there are never too many locals you can talk to about something that actually happened around them and not you. Like I said you like to keep people quiet and only talk about media crap well good luck doing any good with just that info
 
Thoughts with Danielle's family today. I can't imagine how difficult it was for them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed. I was really hoping for an update today on the DNA evidence.

Thinking of Danielle and her family today.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
 
While I have no basis for this, I do think it's possible that LE has been conducting ground and/or water searches but without help from the public.

Farmington Hills police chief Chuck Nebus released a statement on Dec. 23. In it, he said, "Farmington Hills detectives and investigators from several other agencies have been involved in searches and the collection of evidence at numerous locations over the past three weeks." (BBM)

The only search location I am aware of is the house in Berkley in which SG lived.

Whether SG had anything to do with the crime, it is easy to assume that LE is keeping a close watch on him; however, no one is yet in custody. It would make sense to me that LE would be very careful not to disclose search locations, when there is still a possibility of someone being tipped off and interfering or tampering with potential evidence.

I have no idea how many people know where Danielle is, but if more than one, especially, it may be difficult for LE to identify and keep an eye on every single one of them 24/7. With enough probable cause, they may be allowed to monitor someone's communication with others, but more than ever, there are so many ways to get in touch with someone. Also, what if someone is staying at a location with phone or internet service in another person's name, and/or access to someone else's cell phone? Possibilities are endless.

IMO, it's not entirely inconceivable that perhaps LE, at one point, was able to track Danielle's -or her cell phone's- movements for Dec. 2nd and 3rd, and followed pings, etc., but she and/or the phone had already been moved. It's not entirely inconceivable that someone who may or may not be on LE's radar right now would try to plant some random DNA near Danielle in order to raise enough reasonable doubt.

LE has been so unusually tight-lipped about everything with regard to this case, and I really don't believe it's due to lack of evidence. I can't help but think there must be something unique to this case that makes it absolutely necessary for LE to operate in this manner.

Source: http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2016/12...ills-woman-brings-police-to-house-in-berkley/

They initially did ground searches in the beginning. Since then a person who was involved in the searches (he has posted on here as a VI but his name slips my mind), said they decided to stop further searches and they had a good reason. I don't know how to search for it or I would.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
154
Guests online
749
Total visitors
903

Forum statistics

Threads
626,532
Messages
18,528,012
Members
241,075
Latest member
rebeekave
Back
Top