MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #11

[Momma2cam]

I highly doubt she's locked up anywhere...I don't think he is a complete psycho (ok you know what I mean...if he abducted or killed her he is a psycho...) but I think he acted in the heat of the moment....this happens every single day...anger just overwhelms them and they react.

I agree. Most of the time murders happen in the heat of the moment and are not premeditated. Most murderers are not psychopaths, at least by clinical diagnosis terms. That's what makes it even more difficult to turn in someone who you love and care about but suspect did something awful. It seems so out of character and not in line with other traits that you look for reasons to doubt OR even find sympathy.

Of course, there are actual psychopaths and they are much easier to hate - the ones who are mean, unlikable, history of criminal acts, no conscience and show no concern for others, etc.

Without knowing why she was talking to him that day or the nature of their relationship, it makes it hard to speculate what angered him.

My second theory has him more of a middle man or at least involving more people. In this case I see it being more pre -meditated.

I'm worried this case has gone cold and we will be wondering what happened for years to come. I hope I'm wrong.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

 

[monkeypants]

I agree. Most of the time murders happen in the heat of the moment and are not premeditated. Most murderers are not psychopaths, at least by clinical diagnosis terms. That's what makes it even more difficult to turn in someone who you love and care about but suspect did something awful. It seems so out of character and not in line with other traits that you look for reasons to doubt OR even find sympathy.

Of course, there are actual psychopaths and they are much easier to hate - the ones who are mean, unlikable, history of criminal acts, no conscience and show no concern for others, etc.

Without knowing why she was talking to him that day or the nature of their relationship, it makes it hard to speculate what angered him.

My second theory has him more of a middle man or at least involving more people. In this case I see it being more pre -meditated.

I'm worried this case has gone cold and we will be wondering what happened for years to come. I hope I'm wrong.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Interesting... I'd love to hear train of thought.

I think it will be a long time to resolve, but I do think he screwed up somehow...so I do think he will be caught when he least suspects it JMO.

 

[Kadie]

Is anyone else curious why no ex-girlfriends of SG have come forward to speak against him? No family members, no co-workers no beer pong friends? Everyone has been silent? Besides the SIL, it's been strangely quiet...

 

[1smile]

I don't necessarily agree there HAD to be a rape...JMO

I agree

 

[1smile]

I'm still bothered by the fact that no one knew Danielle was missing until the next afternoon.

 

[Momma2cam]

I'm still bothered by the fact that no one knew Danielle was missing until the next afternoon.

Me too...

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

 

[DakotaMayi]

I'm still bothered by the fact that no one knew Danielle was missing until the next afternoon.

Yes! Because of this I then feel suspicious of other things/persons(s) other than FG.

 

[DakotaMayi]

I agree. Most of the time murders happen in the heat of the moment and are not premeditated. Most murderers are not psychopaths, at least by clinical diagnosis terms. That's what makes it even more difficult to turn in someone who you love and care about but suspect did something awful. It seems so out of character and not in line with other traits that you look for reasons to doubt OR even find sympathy.

Of course, there are actual psychopaths and they are much easier to hate - the ones who are mean, unlikable, history of criminal acts, no conscience and show no concern for others, etc.

Without knowing why she was talking to him that day or the nature of their relationship, it makes it hard to speculate what angered him.

My second theory has him more of a middle man or at least involving more people. In this case I see it being more pre -meditated.

I'm worried this case has gone cold and we will be wondering what happened for years to come. I hope I'm wrong.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Seems that clinical diagnosis needs looking into then. I cannot understand why anyone (family member or friend) would want to protect a murderer in their family. That just makes zero sense to me.

There was an unfortunate member of my family and there was just no chance in hell (even for a second) anyone of us would cover for him.

 

[Gardenista]

Is anyone else curious why no ex-girlfriends of SG have come forward to speak against him? No family members, no co-workers no beer pong friends? Everyone has been silent? Besides the SIL, it's been strangely quiet...

Those who would speak against him would go to police.

What speaks volumes to me is no one has come out to speak FOR him.

 

[monkeypants]

Yes! Because of this I then feel suspicious of other things/persons(s) other than FG.

I think there is a group of us all with the same theories that can't truly discuss them.

There is a huge elephant in the Room that's off limits to us.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

[monkeypants]

Seems that clinical diagnosis needs looking into then. I cannot understand why anyone (family member or friend) would want to protect a murderer in their family. That just makes zero sense to me.

There was an unfortunate member of my family and there was just no chance in hell (even for a second) anyone of us would cover for him.

What if it wasn't a murderer but they have information? Would you feel different?

What if the reason no one is speaking out against him is because there is nothing bad to say?

Just throwing it out there.

I still say that SG is the key to the entire case but he didn't necessarily kill her or abduct her. I still believe she was a very willing participant in the events that took place that fateful day. I do believe he knows what happened and most likely where she is tho...

JMO of course.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

[monkeypants]

Those who would speak against him would go to police.

What speaks volumes to me is no one has come out to speak FOR him.

Why would they? He isn't a suspect? I Wouldn't name a friend or family member into the media that wasn't named either. Imo LE would have to do that. If the guy i know is a great guy and LE doesn't name or arrest him then in my mind they have made an error until it's proven otherwise to me.
Let has never once named him. His HOUSE was searched. LE believes obviously that she was there but no arrest. So perhaps she was there for voluntary reasons.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

[Gardenista]

Why would they? He isn't a suspect? I Wouldn't name a friend or family member into the media that wasn't named either. Imo LE would have to do that. If the guy i know is a great guy and LE doesn't name or arrest him then in my mind they have made an error until it's proven otherwise to me.
Let has never once named him. His HOUSE was searched. LE believes obviously that she was there but no arrest. So perhaps she was there for voluntary reasons.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Oh, I think it's likely she was there voluntarily. Regarding FG, I'm just saying coming out and speaking against him seems seems less likely than speaking for him.

At this point, I'm pretty discouraged because I've always thought the police had something. I'm now worried they have nothing. If I was family/friend, I'd be extremely pissed off right now.

 

[1smile]

I think there is a group of us all with the same theories that can't truly discuss them.

There is a huge elephant in the Room that's off limits to us.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Me thinks yes.

 

[monkeypants]

Oh, I think it's likely she was there voluntarily. Regarding FG, I'm just saying coming out and speaking against him seems seems less likely than speaking for him.

At this point, I'm pretty discouraged because I've always thought the police had something. I'm now worried they have nothing. If I was family/friend, I'd be extremely pissed off right now.

Jmo but I think they have plenty unfortunately none it points to murder. Aeverything is really easily explained away. Without a body this one will sit tight. But once found there will be a direct connection to SG imo

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

[Razz]

Where did you see that about Ohio? I would like to read this if you have a link.

I read it as a post, here. Will see if I can find it.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

 

[Rachel1]

Just thinking out loud here-
If I went missing today, I may not be reported missing until the next day either because I'm an adult with my own car, job, personal life. So friends and family may assume that something came up at work, or another friend may have had an emergency or something of that nature if I didn't answer my phone one night. I doubt they'd go right to the police either honestly. So I can kinda see why she wasn't reported missing until the next day.

 

[Rachel1]

Jmo but I think they have plenty unfortunately none it points to murder. Aeverything is really easily explained away. Without a body this one will sit tight. But once found there will be a direct connection to SG imo

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

Agreed
This is exactly what I'm thinking now too. Let's face it, they know how hard it would be to try to prosecute a case with no body and only circumstantial evidence. So they probably have no choice but to wait until something more concrete comes up to tie all the pieces together here.
I do believe SG holds the key to solving this case. But I also believe that it's possible that they just don't have enough to prove their case without a reasonable doubt. Think about
Double jeopardy. They know they have one shot and one shot only so they must be prepared to provide more then enough evidence that supports their case. Sadly I don't think they have that right now.
( All my opinions, nothing more)

 

[Razz]

I read it as a post, here. Will see if I can find it.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

I can't find the post re Ohio nor can
I find my original post re Ohio so I'm hoping it's been deleted.

So sorry!

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

 

[1smile]

I can't find the post re Ohio nor can
I find my original post re Ohio so I'm hoping it's been deleted.

So sorry!

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

No worries! This case has so many posts and twists and turns... Wanted to make sure I did not miss something