MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #11

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would LE really share information about an ongoing investigation with anyone other than immediate family, i.e. Danielle's parents? Could the SIL actually waltz into FHPD, tell them what she "thinks" she knows, and have LE share case details with her? I'm skeptical about what the SIL is saying. I doubt anyone besides Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki are entitled to information about the case. :confused: The SIL doesn't seem like a reliable source of inside information in an ongoing investigation. I'll accept her "claims" if/when there's an arrest, and we're provided with the facts by FHPD.

BBM.

I'm unsure how I feel about the SIL atm, I was wondering though, none of what has come out in media by the SIL has been shut down when people talk about it on FDS? Wouldn't family shut it down if there was no substance to it?
 
Would LE really share information about an ongoing investigation with anyone other than immediate family, i.e. Danielle's parents? Could the SIL actually waltz into FHPD, tell them what she "thinks" she knows, and have LE share case details with her? I'm skeptical about what the SIL is saying. I doubt anyone besides Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki are entitled to information about the case. :confused: The SIL doesn't seem like a reliable source of inside information in an ongoing investigation. I'll accept her "claims" if/when there's an arrest, and we're provided with the facts by FHPD.
I've seen reference to her claims also on the fds page by admin. And yes, it does appear admin and close family is supporting the SIL. I could see FHPD giving her some info in hopes she would either confess to knowing more after hearing evidence they have and/or get her family to talk and turn on him. JMO.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
 
BBM.

I'm unsure how I feel about the SIL atm, I was wondering though, none of what has come out in media by the SIL has been shut down when people talk about it on FDS? Wouldn't family shut it down if there was no substance to it?

I don't think we can talk about the SIL on here.
 
I can confirm as well. I grabbed a pizza at a place about 30 minutes outside of Farmington Hills and her poster was up there.
 
Would LE really share information about an ongoing investigation with anyone other than immediate family, i.e. Danielle's parents? Could the SIL actually waltz into FHPD, tell them what she "thinks" she knows, and have LE share case details with her? I'm skeptical about what the SIL is saying. I doubt anyone besides Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki are entitled to information about the case. :confused: The SIL doesn't seem like a reliable source of inside information in an ongoing investigation. I'll accept her "claims" if/when there's an arrest, and we're provided with the facts by FHPD.

I do not believe LE has shared with the SIL any information that if out in the open, would jeopardize the investigation or prosecution. I do not believe that LE expected the SIL to be so publicly vocal about the case, either, but in providing certain information to her, I do believe they expected it to be shared -or "leaked"- to a degree. I also believe that LE has much more information, some of which has been shared only with Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki, and some they will not share with anyone, until there is an arrest, or the case goes to trial (or there is a plea, etc.).

I suspect LE gave the SIL just enough bits and pieces to get her to talk to SG, hoping that perhaps she could talk him into at least establishing some sort of communication with them (i.e., "Hey, SG, LE tells me they already have this much dirt on you. Now is the time to talk. Maybe you can work out a deal. You can bring a lawyer with you, so your rights are not violated. Think about her family. If you didn't have anything to do with it, at least tell them that").

Sadly, I don't think this type of strategy is going to work with this particular individual. If it ever was, he would have talked by now. He would have helped bring Danielle home. The problem is, it is not the lawyers who are preventing him from sharing what he knows -if anything- with LE. It is up to him. I realize it isn't all that simple, that I am over-simplifying it, but if he felt compelled to do the right thing, he would. It has been four months.

Also, I'm not surprised that there has been no arrest. I think the prosecutors already realize this is not going to be an easy case to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, so they are being forced to take their time - while Danielle's loved ones continue to suffer each and every day. How anyone can go to sleep at night knowing he or she is inflicting so much pain on so many is beyond me.
 
I do not believe LE has shared with the SIL any information that if out in the open, would jeopardize the investigation or prosecution. I do not believe that LE expected the SIL to be so publicly vocal about the case, either, but in providing certain information to her, I do believe they expected it to be shared -or "leaked"- to a degree. I also believe that LE has much more information, some of which has been shared only with Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki, and some they will not share with anyone, until there is an arrest, or the case goes to trial (or there is a plea, etc.).

I suspect LE gave the SIL just enough bits and pieces to get her to talk to SG, hoping that perhaps she could talk him into at least establishing some sort of communication with them (i.e., "Hey, SG, LE tells me they already have this much dirt on you. Now is the time to talk. Maybe you can work out a deal. You can bring a lawyer with you, so your rights are not violated. Think about her family. If you didn't have anything to do with it, at least tell them that").

Sadly, I don't think this type of strategy is going to work with this particular individual. If it ever was, he would have talked by now. He would have helped bring Danielle home. The problem is, it is not the lawyers who are preventing him from sharing what he knows -if anything- with LE. It is up to him. I realize it isn't all that simple, that I am over-simplifying it, but if he felt compelled to do the right thing, he would. It has been four months.

Also, I'm not surprised that there has been no arrest. I think the prosecutors already realize this is not going to be an easy case to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, so they are being forced to take their time - while Danielle's loved ones continue to suffer each and every day. How anyone can go to sleep at night knowing he or she is inflicting so much pain on so many is beyond me.

That is a very well thought out post IMHO, I agree with you 100%!
 
WWJ 950 just reported on the news interview that SG's sister-in-law did with Fox 2 news. Not much new information, but they did confirm SG's full name, that it was his house in Berkeley that was searched and announced the date, time and location of the SIL's March for Truth. Said it should be up on their website soon.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

WWJ said later today they would post the story on their website. So far they haven't, so be careful with revealing SG's name.
 
From FDSFB admin.: "This flyer is effective 2/24/17. Thanks."

16938451_251763275281898_6666882568095978087_n.jpg
 
Danielle Stislicki has now been missing for 12 weeks. Where is she?

Looks like Mr. Stislicki has not posted the Fox 2 video on the official FDSFB site. I wonder if it will eventually end up there... :thinking:

No but they changed the flier quite a bit imo to gently reflect SIL interview
 
The whole story rubbed me the wrong way. No interviews with police? How do we know they're not stringing the SIL along without an on the record statement about her claims from the police? In my subjective mind, I want to believe what the SIL is saying, but in my objective mind, I can't take anything for a fact unless it comes from the police in an official statement. I just want Dani to come home :(

I agree.. I want to believe her and I want to admire her for speaking out against family, HOWEVER, I am still not sure if she is doing it for the right reasons so the verdict is still out on her, for me, anyway !!

I can confirm as well. I grabbed a pizza at a place about 30 minutes outside of Farmington Hills and her poster was up there.

YES !! My daughter lives in Ann Arbor/Saline area and told me she has seen flyers there and has heard a lot about it in her area. I have also seen friends of mine share it on FB throughout the state !! All the way in the UP also.
I just wish we would get some answers and FIND DANI !!!
 
It was referenced on the news cast. Can the event itself be discussed?

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

You can link any MSM article or video just not her FB or the second page she started....
 
Would LE really share information about an ongoing investigation with anyone other than immediate family, i.e. Danielle's parents? Could the SIL actually waltz into FHPD, tell them what she "thinks" she knows, and have LE share case details with her? I'm skeptical about what the SIL is saying. I doubt anyone besides Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki are entitled to information about the case. :confused: The SIL doesn't seem like a reliable source of inside information in an ongoing investigation. I'll accept her "claims" if/when there's an arrest, and we're provided with the facts by FHPD.

I agree, I'm more inclined to think that at best, they have spoon fed her some information that they know would not be detrimental to the investigation if it were to get out. In fact, I think they may actually have intended for it to get out, via her in the hopes that it could provoke further leads, etc.
I'm fairly certain that they aren't just giving out information to anyone who asks for it, particularly those that may have had multiple run-ins with possibly the same police department. LE is usually pretty good at spotting someone with severe mental health issues, particularly if they have multiple interactions with them.
 
The whole story rubbed me the wrong way. No interviews with police? How do we know they're not stringing the SIL along without an on the record statement about her claims from the police? In my subjective mind, I want to believe what the SIL is saying, but in my objective mind, I can't take anything for a fact unless it comes from the police in an official statement. I just want Dani to come home :(

I agree. The SIL's affect is very peculiar. She's talking about something serious but is smiling and even giggling at one point. Reminded me of Burke Ramsey's interview with Dr. Phil.
 
I do not believe LE has shared with the SIL any information that if out in the open, would jeopardize the investigation or prosecution. I do not believe that LE expected the SIL to be so publicly vocal about the case, either, but in providing certain information to her, I do believe they expected it to be shared -or "leaked"- to a degree. I also believe that LE has much more information, some of which has been shared only with Mr. and Mrs. Stislicki, and some they will not share with anyone, until there is an arrest, or the case goes to trial (or there is a plea, etc.).

I suspect LE gave the SIL just enough bits and pieces to get her to talk to SG, hoping that perhaps she could talk him into at least establishing some sort of communication with them (i.e., "Hey, SG, LE tells me they already have this much dirt on you. Now is the time to talk. Maybe you can work out a deal. You can bring a lawyer with you, so your rights are not violated. Think about her family. If you didn't have anything to do with it, at least tell them that").

Sadly, I don't think this type of strategy is going to work with this particular individual. If it ever was, he would have talked by now. He would have helped bring Danielle home. The problem is, it is not the lawyers who are preventing him from sharing what he knows -if anything- with LE. It is up to him. I realize it isn't all that simple, that I am over-simplifying it, but if he felt compelled to do the right thing, he would. It has been four months.

Also, I'm not surprised that there has been no arrest. I think the prosecutors already realize this is not going to be an easy case to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, so they are being forced to take their time - while Danielle's loved ones continue to suffer each and every day. How anyone can go to sleep at night knowing he or she is inflicting so much pain on so many is beyond me.
I also know of a case that touches home for me that happened back in 2001 here in Dearborn Heights, MI
Similar case of a missing girl. Which was a friend to me. Missing since June 3. 2001 they had absoustley no evidence and No body but built the case on suspicion of her recent ex boyfriend.
LE turned over what they did have to prosecutors and went to trial.
The ex boyfriend eventually took a plea deal and for 5 to 15 years. Her body till this day has never been found. Her Mother died without any closure. The Perp has been out of prison 2 years and has a great job and living a good life.
I pray daily for Dani and her family with all this heartache they should not have to go thru. SG needs to man up.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320AZ using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
966
Total visitors
1,110

Forum statistics

Threads
626,206
Messages
18,522,412
Members
240,973
Latest member
LazyPirate
Back
Top