MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #12

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #641
https://patch.com/michigan/farmingt...ct-livonia-sexual-assault-not-person-interest

This article states that "police have interviewed Floyd Galloway, but not labeled him a person of interest in Danielle Stislicki's disappearance."

They have DEFINITELY named him a person of interest: https://www.facebook.com/Local4/videos/10156015006401002/
http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2017/06/28/evidence-danielle-stislicki-case/

"According to Farmington Hills police, there is in fact a connection between the arrest of an Oakland County man — now charged in the alleged attack of a Livonia jogger — and the Stislicki case.

The FHPD said Wednesday that “combined investigations” led Livonia police to arrest 30-year-old Floyd Galloway, Jr. of Berkley on June 27 for an attempted sexual assault on the Hines Park jogging path on Sept. 4 of last year.

The detectives investigating the Stislicki case have spoken to Galloway in the past and have conducted previous searches at his Berkley home, police said."
 
  • #642
Well, here I go again but... what if they never file charges against him regarding Danielle's s disappearance or they find it was someone else?
I would think they'd have to let him go for the Livonia rape because his DNA was used against him before ever
being charged in DS's disappearance or before ever being charged with a felony?
I don't know but I think that's real shaky ground.

In the Katrina Vetrano case, they had no hits in the database from her murderer. When police had an idea who the perp was, they asked him if they could take a swab from his mouth. He gave it freely.

So, does the SW executed on his home, allow police to put his DNA that was collected at his home in the database? I would think the DNA collected at his home would only be used as evidence against him in a trial in DS's disappearance

If he was/is never charged in DS's disappearance and or murder, couldn' t he request the removal of his DNA from the database?







Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk


He cannot request a removal from the database. Once he provides the court mandated sample, as was requested during his arraignment, his DNA is in there for life.

If I recall correctly, in the Chelsea Bruck case, they collected DNA from her costume that didn't match anything in the database. Her killer was later arrested on an unrelated theft charge and his DNA was taken at that time.

Once his DNA was in the database, it popped up as a match to the unknown DNA found on Chelsea's items. Boom. He went down for her murder




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #643
How did they know to arrest him if DNA wasn't the connection? I just assumed they had samples from her fingernails or a hair and were able to link it once they got the DNA back from his house search?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

How do we know that DNA was the connection that lead to his arrest? Is there any MSM out there to back that up? Is it possible the victim my have recognized FG as her attacker and may have reported that to police? We do know that FG's picture was circulating on social media due to his SIL's insistence in relation to Danielle's disappearance!
 
  • #644
How do we know that DNA was the connection that lead to his arrest? Is there any MSM out there to back that up? Is it possible the victim my have recognized FG as her attacker and may have reported that to police? We do know that FG's picture was circulating on social media due to his SIL's insistence!

We don't. My question would be if it is not DNA then what could the evidence be that would connect the two cases? The victim could have recognized him however that would not automatically mean he was a POI in Danis case. It doesn't sound like they did a line up. He was arrested at work and his attorney stated this came out of the blue. This makes me believe there was DNA or something they found in his house that maybe tied the two cases together. DNA from the jogger on something of his??? But then why would they have taken her DNA ... ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #645
They have DEFINITELY named him a person of interest: https://www.facebook.com/Local4/videos/10156015006401002/
http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2017/06/28/evidence-danielle-stislicki-case/

"According to Farmington Hills police, there is in fact a connection between the arrest of an Oakland County man — now charged in the alleged attack of a Livonia jogger — and the Stislicki case.

The FHPD said Wednesday that “combined investigations” led Livonia police to arrest 30-year-old Floyd Galloway, Jr. of Berkley on June 27 for an attempted sexual assault on the Hines Park jogging path on Sept. 4 of last year.

The detectives investigating the Stislicki case have spoken to Galloway in the past and have conducted previous searches at his Berkley home, police said."

Sorry for not adding additional detail to my post. I saw here and several other places he was a POI, but this article from just a few hours ago seems to contradict that. Would there be a good reason for LE to walk back a step at this point?

I know they have searched, etc., so I was just wondering why this article from earlier this evening seems to contradict previous reports that he is a POI.
 
  • #646
Sorry for not adding additional detail to my post. I saw here and several other places he was a POI, but this article from just a few hours ago seems to contradict that. Would there be a good reason for LE to walk back a step at this point?

I know they have searched, etc., so I was just wondering why this article from earlier this evening seems to contradict previous reports that he is a POI.

No idea. Very odd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #647
He cannot request a removal from the database. Once he provides the court mandated sample, as was requested during his arraignment, his DNA is in there for life.

If I recall correctly, in the Chelsea Bruck case, they collected DNA from her costume that didn't match anything in the database. Her killer was later arrested on an unrelated theft charge and his DNA was taken at that time.

Once his DNA was in the database, it popped up as a match to the unknown DNA found on Chelsea's items. Boom. He went down for her murder




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not referring to the DNA mandated at his arraignment.

But not to worry. I'm moving on from this and will wait until July 6 when this will hopefully be explained.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 
  • #648
Ok, I think I may have found the discrepancy.
In this article from yesterday, they said LIVONIA police called him a POI in Dani's case.
https://patch.com/michigan/farmingt...ssing-person-case-police-have-person-interest

Today's article (same website) quotes FARMINGTON HILLS police saying that THEY haven't named him a POI in Dani's case.
https://patch.com/michigan/farmingt...ct-livonia-sexual-assault-not-person-interest

To me it seems like perhaps Livonia police jumped the gun in their statement yesterday.
That's the only thing I can figure out whey he is/he is not a POI.
 
  • #649
We don't. My question would be if it is not DNA then what could the evidence be that would connect the two cases? The victim could have recognized him however that would not automatically mean he was a POI in Danis case. It doesn't sound like they did a line up. He was arrested at work and his attorney stated this came out of the blue. This makes me believe there was DNA or something they found in his house that maybe tied the two cases together. DNA from the jogger on something of his??? But then why would they have taken her DNA ... ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can't say for sure what exactly connects the two cases, however, I do agree it doesn't sound like they did a line up. Even so, the jogger could have identified FG as her attacker and went to the police with that information. Could it be that FG kept items belonging to his victims? Could it be that the manner in which the crimes were committed were similar? Perhaps, isolation combined with a vicious attack suggests a pattern? Could it be that Danielle and the jogger were both known to FG and not random targets? I just can't be certain at this point that DNA is what connects the cases!
 
  • #650
Floyd is guilty as sin. I'm not going to argue with anyone about facts. Puzzle pieces are all coming together. He knows what he did. Because he has no flipping soul he'll never tell what he did to Dani.<modsnip> I highly doubt his wife still backs him. She surely nor any of her family appeared in court in his defense! Much love to her parents and siblings and friends. Floyd will get his time. Wait and see. <modsnip>

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320AZ using Tapatalk

Her mom is the only one that has ever apologized to her. The rest are still backing him.
 
  • #651
I'm not aware of Michigan collecting DNA for drunk driving convictions.

If it was a third DUI in his lifetime it would be a felony and only then would they collect DNA.
 
  • #652
How do we know that DNA was the connection that lead to his arrest? Is there any MSM out there to back that up? Is it possible the victim my have recognized FG as her attacker and may have reported that to police? We do know that FG's picture was circulating on social media due to his SIL's insistence in relation to Danielle's disappearance!

Yes, the link I provided above has MSM local news broadcast saying there was DNA from the attempted rape. I don't know why there is so much resistance to this when he has been under investigation for months. Why the reluctance to believe it now?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #653
FG reminds me of another man I knew when working at my last position. Very helpful, quite eager to provide you with information you might need but didn't ask for. I remember speaking with him and not feeling quite at ease, even though he seemed to be working very hard at being helpful. I recall saying "OK" quite a bit to his comments, and made sure to thank him for his time.

The next thing I heard, he was walked out by Security for threatening someone.

Call me intuitive, but I'm sensing FG is the same way. We just never know whom we are dealing with. So many people seem to be above suspicion, then they turn out to be criminals.

Just my VHO.

If FG is not the perp in Dani's case, then I'll gladly stand corrected.
 
  • #654
"We need to remain graceful
We need to go ahead and stay focused
It's not a witch hunt
I want people to be aware that this will go through it's legal channels the way it should be."


Mom is one class act. We could all take a lesson from her.

http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/who-is-floyd-galloway
 
  • #655
If he premeditated a crime against Danielle, that alone would explain why he was there.

Yeah except he was well known there so he was going to be seen, plus she left at a time that was unusual. Was he hiding in her jeep?
 
  • #656
Oh I came in to get a check they messed up my pay, any number of lies could have been used.

ML was NOT his employer! Plus he'd been gone months
 
  • #657
Idk something just isn't adding up time wise . He just looked like a slob to me and not a calculating, meticulous murderer. He was playing beer pong the next day, early. He went to his old place of business where he would absolutely be recognized. No one trying to pull off a perfect murder would do that. We are all missing something. I just can't figure out what.
 
  • #658
Yes, the link I provided above has MSM local news broadcast saying there was DNA from the attempted rape. I don't know why there is so much resistance to this when he has been under investigation for months. Why the reluctance to believe it now?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not reluctant to believe it and I'm certainly not here to argue, it just hasn't been definitively stated that the connection is for a fact DNA.....that could however be inferred from the MSM, but it's still not 100% definitive in my opinion. I do consider there are other possibilities that may be connections as well.
 
  • #659
Yeah except he was well known there so he was going to be seen, plus she left at a time that was unusual. Was he hiding in her jeep?

I have no clue, but he could have taken calculated risks, those may or may not worked have out for him!
 
  • #660
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
60
Guests online
1,518
Total visitors
1,578

Forum statistics

Threads
632,382
Messages
18,625,508
Members
243,125
Latest member
JosBay
Back
Top