MI MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 #14 *ARREST*

[Lupy]

Maybe, just maybe, nearly 1 year later he will provide some closure to the Stislicki Family and they can finally bring their girl home.

He was offered the plea deal, turned it down. Then said he would accept and later declined. They indicated there would be no further deals. I’m holding out a tiny shred of hope that it was put back on the table only due to receiving information on Danielle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RBBM

I am holding out hope on this idea, too!

 

[ElementalLaura]

Wow, I hope this does bring more information to light. Prayers for Dani and her family.

 

[mrspecific]

I call for prayers from Everyone who reads Danielle Stislicki's pages, and Everyone, ask people you know to pray, for a Man, for a Woman, to say something, or to be at the place where her remains are laid, to see something, to contact authorities to preserve evidence, so she may come home to her Family.

...There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed... Matthew 10:26

 

[Kadie]

http://www.wxyz.com/news/mother-of-...are-not-going-to-stop-until-justice-is-served

Interview with Dani's mom.
I have a question. In this interview she said she is happy that due to this plea deal Floyd will no longer be able to plead the 5th.
Now...does that mean only in the jogger case, or is there a possibility that part of this plea bargain somehow includes that he can't plead the 5th in relation to Dani's case?
If it applies to him in general, across the board so to speak, is this standard or could the plea deal have been cleverly crafted by the DA to include that.

I can't believe his taking the deal could prevent him from pleading the 5th in other cases, but who knows?
That might be why the comments have been made that they are hopeful this will further Dani's case.
Hoping, wishing, praying.

I was confused by her statement too. I believe it means only in this case, not with Dani's case. (or any other crimes he may have committed).

 

[Midge Montana]

I was confused by her statement too. I believe it means only in this case, not with Dani's case. (or any other crimes he may have committed).

Do we have any attorneys on this thread that can educate us on this?

 

[Holocene]

Do we have any attorneys on this thread that can educate us on this?

In the video Ann says he is no longer able to plead in relation to this case, not Danielle’s. I have been told that’s what she meant by the statement. I hope that helps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Trinitee]

Thank you Holocene, hope you are doing well.

 

[forthefreefood]

Is it normal for someone taking a plea deal to give a statement of what their version of events was?? Or did he just choose to do that?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[Midge Montana]

In the video Ann says he is no longer able to plead in relation to this case, not Danielle’s. I have been told that’s what she meant by the statement. I hope that helps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks Holocene. It does help. Though I wish it were otherwise.

 

[Midge Montana]

Is it normal for someone taking a plea deal to give a statement of what their version of events was?? Or did he just choose to do that?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

I wondered that too. I can't recall seeing that before right off the top of my head.

 

[mi_hiker]

Is it normal for someone taking a plea deal to give a statement of what their version of events was?? Or did he just choose to do that?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Did his statement come before or after accepting the deal? If after, I wonder if providing a statement was part of the deal. Fits with Ann Stislicki indicating he could no longer plead the fifth. Either way, I’m glad he’s on record. Otherwise he could always just say he accepted the deal because he knew he couldn’t win even though innocent (cough, cough).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[loreet]

Is it normal for someone taking a plea deal to give a statement of what their version of events was?? Or did he just choose to do that?

I do not believe FG chose to allocute to this crime spontaneously and of his own free will. I have seen allocutions to the specific details of a crime before, generally as a condition of a guilty plea agreement. I found it satisfying, as there is no disputing this confession -- no one has a knife to his throat, no one is promising him any unrealistic relief, he admits he is satisfied with his privately financed defense attorney.

I believe the prosecution was very crafty in this case and in requiring FG to stipulate to the choking of the victim to the point of being unable to breathe and rendering her unconscious. Even though the 'intent to murder' charge was dropped, this statement essentially says she could have died, and that all events that occurred were against his victim's will. This establishes a pattern of behavior, a method of operation, that can hopefully be used against FG when the time comes to prosecute Dani's case.

 

[mi_hiker]

I do not believe FG chose to allocute to this crime spontaneously and of his own free will. I have seen allocutions to the specific details of a crime before, generally as a condition of a guilty plea agreement. I found it satisfying, as there is no disputing this confession -- no one has a knife to his throat, no one is promising him any unrealistic relief, he admits he is satisfied with his privately financed defense attorney.

I believe the prosecution was very crafty in this case and in requiring FG to stipulate to the choking of the victim to the point of being unable to breathe and rendering her unconscious. Even though the 'intent to murder' charge was dropped, this statement essentially says she could have died, and that all events that occurred were against his victim's will. This establishes a pattern of behavior, a method of operation, that can hopefully be used against FG when the time comes to prosecute Dani's case.

I think you nailed it 100%. They’re in this for the long game and now have the time they need knowing he’s off the streets for the time being.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Gardenista]

Dakmak

"This was his decision that he thought about for a long time," John Dakmak, Galloway's attorney, said after the hearing. "It's the rest of his life, possibly."

Nebus

Farmington Hills Police Chief Charles Nebus wouldn't comment on the effect Galloway's plea in the Livonia case would affect the Stislicki investigation — "We can't predict the future," he said — but pointed out that case "remains active."

"We have now executed over 70 search warrants, followed up hundreds of leads, collected numerous pieces of evidence and we continue to believe the case will eventually be solved," Nebus said. "Our focus at this time is to locate Danielle's remains to expedite our investigative time line."

Prosecutor

"We are very pleased that the defendant chose to accept responsibility for the crimes that he committed," Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy said in a statement.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/wayne/2017/11/21/floyd-galloway-hines-park/886165001/

 

[Gardenista]

Dakmak

“I think this is something my client’s been dealing with for a long time,” said Galloway’s defense attorney John Dakmak. “There’s a lot at stake in this case; the risk of going to trial, the potential of losing as opposed to entering into this plea agreement.”

“This was his decision,” Dakmak added. “He thought about it for a long time.”

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2017/11...kes-plea-deal-in-hines-park-sex-assault-case/

 

[Bravo]

I have seen many give a statement in Court. Some stand out. BTK's monotone detailed monologue. Polly Klass's killer (cant remember his name) which was disgusting and many others. These are just the one's that pop into my head on the fly.
Richard Allen Davis (Polly's killer")

 

[Gardenista]

I do not believe FG chose to allocute to this crime spontaneously and of his own free will. I have seen allocutions to the specific details of a crime before, generally as a condition of a guilty plea agreement. I found it satisfying, as there is no disputing this confession -- no one has a knife to his throat, no one is promising him any unrealistic relief, he admits he is satisfied with his privately financed defense attorney.

I believe the prosecution was very crafty in this case and in requiring FG to stipulate to the choking of the victim to the point of being unable to breathe and rendering her unconscious. Even though the 'intent to murder' charge was dropped, this statement essentially says she could have died, and that all events that occurred were against his victim's will. This establishes a pattern of behavior, a method of operation, that can hopefully be used against FG when the time comes to prosecute Dani's case.

Hoping the judge also uses that part at sentencing to give him 35 years.

 

[Gardenista]

New story from Karen Drew

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news...ea-deal-in-assault-case?__vfz=medium=sharebar

 

[thekarmabus]

I truly hope he receives the max of 35 years.
Prayers for her family and loved ones. Keep them in your thoughts . Everyday is rough, the holidays excruciating .
The courthouse was a mad house this morning. By time I made it through security he had already pleaded . I was so hoping I would make it to that courtroom in time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Gardenista]

Brian Abel WXYZ was live with details of a plea agreement with the person of interest in Danielle Stislicki’s disappearance.

https://www.facebook.com/wxyzdetroit/videos/10154959676306135/