I cant wait to hear as to why FG's car was even at MetLife. If it broke down in the parking lot why there. If he broke down and pushed it to the parking lot if memory serves me that would be quite a distance to push a vehicle from nearby roads.
No problem. I just searched for "witnesses" in this thread and the last one and found the article that I had remembered. That search feature is really useful.Thanks for clarifying above tresir2012. So much time has passed and many, many threads.
I'm not sure if I remember correctly but don't they have evidence of him taking the route he took December 2nd also on a previous date? You know, as if he did a dry run? We have only seen a small sample of what is going to come out. I can only imagine what else they have.Thank you, and I concur. That said, I think there are folks who have already decided that FG is guilty and should be convicted of first degree premeditated murder. Juries don't render verdicts based on what they think happened or what others have told them happened, what might have happened, or what must have happened. Juries should determine guilt or innocence based on the facts presented at trial. We are a few months, at least, from the trial, so we don't have all of the evidence. The limited evidence that is available is largely circumstantial and would certainly not be enough for me to find FG guilty of first degree premediated murder beyond a reasonable doubt.
I believe one of the witnesses testified that FG’s cell phone records indicate he drove the route from MetLife to his home earlier on the very day Danielle disappeared, December 2, 2016. Which IMO is suggestive of intent to a nefarious purpose, knowing that she was last observed by witnesses with him in the passenger’s seat of her car that same day and never again seen by her family, friends, or work colleagues. I agree there will be more evidence we have not seen, the totality of which will hopefully be strong enough convict him — if not of premeditated murder then of first degree felony murder committed during her abduction. That sentence would be the same as premeditated murder — LWOP.I'm not sure if I remember correctly but don't they have evidence of him taking the route he took December 2nd also on a previous date? You know, as if he did a dry run? We have only seen a small sample of what is going to come out. I can only imagine what else they have.
a reasonable inference is that last to be seen with her, FRGjr drove Danielle's Jeep to the IGA parking space Danielle was known to use. How did FRGjr know which space? i suggest FRGjr saw Danielle park in the spot once or more. Had Danielle driven home she would have gone into her apartment with her belongings, taken care of her cat whom she loved "like a child", and proceeded to her Friend Sarah's home as planned. Her keys and fitbit would not have been found near the expressway ramp. The evidence placed on the record at the proceedings of Sept 9-10 by Powell-Horowitz, is more than sufficient for FRGjr to have been bound over for trial on the charges. I look for testimony from witnesses to activity by FRGjr between 6:20 to 7:53pm, Dec 2nd.

I don't remember if this was posted or not.
Will Danielle Stislicki be found? Some experts doubt it.
I think there should be a law passed that imposes "special circumstances" if the Perp refuses to disclose the location of remains. This of course, is the last area where they can control and torture the family; not giving them proper closure.It is too bad they don't have the death penalty in Michigan: Often the prosecutor will take the death penalty off the table if the defendant tells them where the body is- in this case i don't think this perp will reveal that---