Still Missing MI - Danielle Stislicki, 28, Southfield, 2 Dec 2016 *ARREST* #16

[Nina Michigan]

Okay - I will put it back as trial, but have a nagging feeling it is NOT going to be a trial starting then...

I'm planning to attend at least part of the trial, so we'll see.

 

[Nina Michigan]

ope, duplicate

 

[Niner]

I'm planning to attend at least part of the trial, so we'll see.

Oh good! Our own reporter!

 

[BiminiBread]

The Judge Ruled in December to supress the evidence because of how the evidence was obtained by LE. The AG appealed the ruling because they lost, therefore the case gets disposed at the Circuit Court and goes to the Appelate Docket until the appeal process is complete and then .... back to circuit for trial.

 

[Niner]

Docket update:

Date Code Desc
02/09/2023 ORD ORDER FILED COA

link:Court Explorer

 

[Niner]

The Judge Ruled in December to supress the evidence because of how the evidence was obtained by LE. The AG appealed the ruling because they lost, therefore the case gets disposed at the Circuit Court and goes to the Appelate Docket until the appeal process is complete and then .... back to circuit for trial.

Do you know "which" Circuit Court it went to? I have quite a few bookmarked in Michigan. TIA!

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

FG's trial was supposed to begin on March 23, 2023. That date has come and gone. Will FG ever stand trial for the disappearance of Danielle Stislicki? This is beyond frustrating!

Trial for Floyd Galloway, charged in murder of Danielle Stislicki, delayed to 2023

Floyd Galloway has long been suspected of killing Danielle Stislicki, who disappeared in 2016. His trial has now been delayed until at least March 2023.

www.fox2detroit.com

 

[Nina Michigan]

Do you know "which" Circuit Court it went to? I have quite a few bookmarked in Michigan. TIA!

Oakland County Circuit Court

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Recent document entries in the case:

Date	Code	Desc
02/09/2023	ORD	ORDER FILED COA	Order Document
12/08/2022	FD	FINAL DISPOSITION
12/08/2022	SY	STAY
12/08/2022	ORD	ORDER FILED GRANT MTN TO STAY PROCEEDINGS/	Order Document
12/07/2022	MPS	MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED

Circuit Court | Circuit Court

www.oakgov.com

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

Michigan Court of Appeals

https://www.courts.michigan.gov/courts/court-of-appeals/

COA 364083​

https://www.courts.michigan.gov/case-search/?page=1&resultType=cases&sortOrder=Newest&pageSize=10&aPartyName=floyd%20galloway

 

[Niner]

Michigan Court of Appeals

https://www.courts.michigan.gov/courts/court-of-appeals/

COA 364083​

https://www.courts.michigan.gov/case-search/?page=1&resultType=cases&sortOrder=Newest&pageSize=10&aPartyName=floyd%20galloway

Thank you the COA court site!

 

[Ozoner]

Some key evidence was excluded. What are the prosecution's chances of winning the appeal? I don't see that law enforcement did anything wrong. The polygraph examiner came forward of his own volition. He may have violated professional ethics, but that isn't law enforcement's fault, is it? I admit that I have no knowledge of the laws that would apply to a situation like this.

 

[Nina Michigan]

Some key evidence was excluded. What are the prosecution's chances of winning the appeal? I don't see that law enforcement did anything wrong. The polygraph examiner came forward of his own volition. He may have violated professional ethics, but that isn't law enforcement's fault, is it? I admit that I have no knowledge of the laws that would apply to a situation like this.

I believe the polygrapher broke privilege.

 

[BetteDavisEyes]

^

Judge suppresses key evidence in Danielle Stislicki murder trial

Prosecutors can't use information and evidenced seized as a result of a lie detector test given to Floyd Galloway by his defense team.

www.detroitnews.com

A judge ruled Wednesday to suppress evidence against an accused murderer, concluding that allowing it would violate the accused's due process rights.

Prosecutors will not be able to use information from and evidenced seized as a direct result of a lie detector test given to Floyd Galloway by his defense team as part of the investigation into the disappearance of Danielle Stislicki, 28, of Farmington Hills. Evidence seized from search warrants "that contained or (were) built upon the privileged information" will be determined at a different time.

Galloway's defense attorney, Ellen Michaels, said that Oakland County police officers, the state Attorney General's office and a private polygraph examiner shared results from a private lie detector test given to Floyd Galloway and used it to obtain search warrants and enable the AG's Office to build a case against Galloway in the Dec. 2, 2016, disappearance of Stislicki...

 

[Niner]

4/6/23: (20) Brief Appellant

Party Attorney Service Date Oral Argument Requested Timely
People of MI Shimkus, Scott 4/6/2023 Yes Yes

link: https://www.courts.michigan.gov/c/courts/coa/case/364083


Going to guess that this is the prosecutor filing an objection to the Judge's order the previous day - article posted on #34 above. ??

It won't let me "open" it to look...

 

[Ozoner]

I believe the polygrapher broke privilege.

Yes. The question is, should law enforcement be penalized for what that polygraph examiner did?

I don't think that investigators did anything wrong. I don't think that they should be required to ignore information brought to them by someone breaking privilege any more than they should be required to ignore an unsolicited confession. The law might say otherwise. Does anyone here know what statute or statutes would apply?

If there's no statute dealing with this specific issue, there might be case law that has established a precedent.

 

[Nina Michigan]

Yes. The question is, should law enforcement be penalized for what that polygraph examiner did?

I don't think that investigators did anything wrong. I don't think that they should be required to ignore information brought to them by someone breaking privilege any more than they should be required to ignore an unsolicited confession. The law might say otherwise. Does anyone here know what statute or statutes would apply?

If there's no statute dealing with this specific issue, there might be case law that has established a precedent.

My dad was a criminal defense attorney and I wish he was still here to explain. Anything obtained via this broken privilege is fruit of a poisoned tree. JMO IMO therefore inadmissible

 

[Midge Montana]

Everything about this case makes me damn mad.
It’s not too late for an Easter miracle today.

 

[Niner]

Just some updates....

Appeal site updates:

Can not copy & paste from this court site - so am typing it up.

4/18/2023 21 Motion: Extend Time - Appellee

4/25/2023 22 Submitted on Administrative Motion Docket

4/26/2023 23 Order: Extend Time - Applellee Brief-Grant

5/25/2023 24 Brief: Appellee

5/25/2023 25 Noticed

5/31/2023 26 Correspondence Received

5/31/2023 27 Correspondence Received

6/1/2023 28 Electronic Record Filed.

link: https://www.courts.michigan.gov/c/courts/coa/case/364083


and from the court site updates since last time:

Date Code Desc
05/31/2023 SEN SENT TO COA/FTP/KK

05/26/2023 NTC NOTICE FILED REQ FOR FILE COA Order Document

02/09/2023 ORD ORDER FILED COA

link: Court Explorer

 

[clinteastwood]

Yes. The question is, should law enforcement be penalized for what that polygraph examiner did?

I don't think that investigators did anything wrong. I don't think that they should be required to ignore information brought to them by someone breaking privilege any more than they should be required to ignore an unsolicited confession. The law might say otherwise. Does anyone here know what statute or statutes would apply?

If there's no statute dealing with this specific issue, there might be case law that has established a precedent.

Just seems disgusting and ridiculous to exclude the evidence that came from fgj’s polygraph. Obviously, he gave up that information. What was the point of doing a polygraph?!