- Joined
- Mar 4, 2010
- Messages
- 36,516
- Reaction score
- 85,718
..now why would you say that "Bette" ?
![]()
:floorlaugh: The Griem Reaper at his grungiest!!! :floorlaugh: Like something that the mouse dragged in - "Griemzabella"

..now why would you say that "Bette" ?
![]()
..now why would you say that "Bette" ?
![]()
"We received no clothing from the victim's body from the medical examiner" or police, Michigan State Police Forensic Science Division Director John Collins said Thursday. "There were items in the car that were submitted, but nothing that she was wearing."
"This is important. Very, very important," said Dr. Werner Spitz, former Wayne County medical examiner and coauthor on the standard textbook for medical-legal investigations of death.
Bob Bashara's attorney, David Griem, said his client never got the clothing.
"DNA and other evidence that could have pointed to the killer and that could have exonerated Bob Bashara has now been lost," Griem said.
The loss of clothing is "devastating news for the family," Griem said. "This is a significant roadblock in the search for truth and justice for Jane Bashara."
Spitz called the loss of the clothing "a huge thing." He said clothing often picks up threads from an attacker's clothing, hair, body fluids and other clues, "or a torn button or a million other things."
In criminal cases, Spitz's textbook says, the chain of custody for clothing "as with all evidence must be maintained at all times. A signed receipt listing each item should be obtained from the police officer who takes the clothes to the crime laboratory."
"Sometimes the value of a detailed examination of the clothing may exceed that of the autopsy," Spitz writes.
University of Michigan law professor Len Niehoff, who teaches evidence, said the loss of the clothing is "extraordinarily troublesome."
"If you don't have the clothing, you don't know what was on it, and you don't know what evidence was lost," Niehoff said.
Keeping track of a victim's clothing is "pretty elementary evidence practice," Niehoff said. "It raises questions about the other aspects of the police work."
http://www.freep.com/article/201203...idence?odyssey=tab|mostpopular|text|FRONTPAGEAccording to the Wayne County Medical Examiner's Office, an autopsy was conducted Jan. 26. Records show Bashara's body and clothing were released the next day to the A.H. Peters Funeral Home in Grosse Pointe Woods, which handled the visitation and cremation. According to the office, her clothing included black stretch pants, a greenish-blue blouse, house shoes and underwear.
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2012/03/report_jane_basharas_clothes_m.htmlAn email seeking comment was sent Friday morning to a spokeswoman with the Wayne County prosecutor's office, which on Monday charged handyman Joe Gentz in Bashara's death.
Of the possible missing clothing, Gentz's lawyer Susan Reed said: "That shouldn't happen."
http://www.freep.com/article/201203...uld-be-lost-as-Jane-Bashara-s-clothes-missing
Key evidence could be lost as Jane Bashara's clothes missing
Speaking live on WWJ Newsradio 950, David Griem, attorney for Bob Bashara — Jane Bashara’s husband — said private investigators hired by the family picked up rumors of the missing clothing about a week ago.“They went to the funeral home and the director of the funeral home refused to answer their questions,” Griem said — adding that he’s not sure what is to blame for the loss of evidence.
Investigators are now trying to figure out exactly what happened to that clothing, or if it even still exists.
Langton and Griem both said the loss of evidence could be devastating to the criminal case against Gentz.
“The defense could make a motion to throw the case out if there isn’t substantial evidence and that would be a real tragedy here. We’ll have to see if police have other evidence and I suspect that that’s why police went back to the Bashara house to see if they could possibly find that DNA evidence,” said Langton.
Phillip Potter, an A.H. Peters funeral director, signed for the body and clothing. He said Thursday that he didn't remember what was done with the clothing. The funeral home's usual practice is to discard soiled or bloodstained clothing in the trash rather than return it to the family, Potter said.
WHAT? Does this seem odd to anyone else? Discard the clothing in the trash? In a murder investigation? You would think at the very least the clothing would be handed over to investigators immediately after removal from the victim and let LE decide what to do with it. Surely the funeral home knew this case was high profile. HOW does this happen? I do not understand??
Call me skeptical but I want to know who Bob knows at that funeral home and what connections he has there!
Also, can someone answer 2 questions for me:
1. Are autopsies usually done in the actual funeral homes or does the ME have a different location and then they are transferred to funeral homes once the autopsy is completed? Do ME's work for funeral homes?
2. I think I remember Bob wanted Jane cremated. Did this ever happen or did she have a normal burial? Sorry, I can't recall.
In the case of an obvious murder, isn't the ME's office considered part of the LE end of things? And even if they weren't, why would a ME's office give evidence in a murder to anyone, including a funeral home?
A funeral home isn't officially included in any part of a legal process. They just prepare the body for viewing and handle the burial/cremation arrangements. Unlike the ME office, who is actually responsible for determining the cause of death, which in Jane's case, was MURDER!
I'm with mrsu. I think bb may know someone at the funeral home. He chose it for a reason....
<snip>Also, can someone answer 2 questions for me:
1. Are autopsies usually done in the actual funeral homes or does the ME have a different location and then they are transferred to funeral homes once the autopsy is completed? Do ME's work for funeral homes?