So, I think he would have been more successful if instead of arguing he’s a noble person from Wales, or making up the Edgar persona, he stuck with the two he already has: Mark, the professional chemist, and “The Wolf” (Olykos).
The Wolf clearly had a more complex history, perhaps the chase is part of the game for him? Kevin was a bigger guy, maybe that’s why he couldn’t get away and was stabbed in the back...
not quite sure where I’m going with this, but I feel if he just told the police he’s not Mark, he’s a wolf who needs to hunt and kill and eat it’s prey, it would have been a better defense than this noble person who never made an appearance until The Wolf was caught...
imho
I thought it was 8:30 this morningDo we know what time the hearing will be today?
Bipolar/ Manic depression is treated with medications and is associated with varying levels of Mania.
Unmedicated, the highs of self-esteem are intense, the lows debilitating. The mania can cause violent outbursts with more strength than normal.
Mania is associated with Manic Depression and Categorized as Bipolar 1 and Bipolar 2. Mania can then be divided into hypomania and hypermania.
Every person has a personality that has varying characteristics, and if one person tends to have more markers present under a certain category of personality types it is coined a disorder, when it interrupts a person's interpersonal relationships.
Personality disorders are more often than not, by itself or in comparison to any other diagnosis, commonly misdiagnosed, because there are no cures or medications to treat one's personality to understand and compare if one is truly one or the other. Much of the diagnosis is based on guesswork.
One of the most severe and disabling of psychiatric illness is paranoid schizophrenia.
I could not imagine a person's state of being if they suffer from Bipolar 1 with Hypermania/Hypermanic states while subsequently being afflicted with Paranoid Schizophrenia. The 2 are difficult enough for one person to manage alone, but together would clearly drive one to a point of insanity, imo.
I thought about that too, a news story I read asked people to come forward and it would be kept "confidential". If the person's testimony was found to be valuable and needed to be heard in court, could the person's identity be protected? I'm sure it could be, but just the thought of having to share that type of information publicly will likely keep some who interacted with him silent.There may be many who had an unpleasant experience with killer who will not come forward. Those who keep their lifestyle secret. IMO
I hope the police release a statement for those individuals. A line they can contact where they can give info but with the promise their lifestyle wont become public. Then the flood gates may open
Again, my description was overly simplified, intentionally, and based on my personal experience with BPD, rather than the textbook/web C&P. "Mania" was the wrong word. Maybe Schizoaffective disorder is a better spot for that pin. The 2013 re-labeling of forms of Schizophrenia may have been needed, but it lumped a lot of ground under one flag. When I get time, I'll look harder for links to his previous court appearances.
Your last line is spot on. There is no way I'd have survived the last 6-7 years without support.
Thanks for sharing your story. BPD has such negative connotations, even amongst mental health professionals, and it makes it very difficult for individuals to find or even seek appropriate, effective help.
FWIW, I would be surprised if ML has a BPD diagnosis, but clearly have very limited information to make that formal assessment and it's obviously unethical to do so based on that.
Schizotypal personality disorder may be a possibility (again, MOO, not a clinical assessment).
Ah! I missed the BPD diagnosis and only recall vague reference to "personality disorder."Previous articles on ML listed the BPD diagnosis, along with Paranoid Schizophrenia, but I haven't had the time to research the court records. He's in the next county, and I have little experience navigating their system, and none of the inside sources I have here. I've a feeling a reporter misunderstood "borderline" to mean "sorta like", IMO only.
Yes, mental health care is a serious issue in the US. Incarceration is a more lucrative industry that would be damaged heavily by adequate mental health systems. Insurance is a Socialist construct, ran by Capitalists. Judgment without understanding and/or empathy is far too prevalent here. Soapbox tossed in the fire... LOL
Ah! I missed the BPD diagnosis and only recall vague reference to "personality disorder."
Me too. (Hence why I said something about what PD I thought he had.)Ah! I missed the BPD diagnosis and only recall vague reference to "personality disorder."
Me threeMe too. (Hence why I said something about what PD I thought he had.)
I’m sorry, but I have no sympathy for him and his mental health problems. He knows that he requires medication to function properly in society, and yet he goes off the medication. To me—and this is based on opinion—he is accountable for his actions while he was off his medication because he knew, when he was ON his medication, that he acts irrationally and improperly without it. Some will argue that people go off their medications because of unpleasant side effects. I might buy that once, but this person apparently has done it again and again. Furthermore, I don’t patients who are on chemotherapy for cancer suffer from unpleasant side effects. What happens if they go off their medication to avoid these side effects? We do what we have to do to stay healthy—whether physically or mentally—and when we don’t, consequences ensue. Forgive me if you believe my position lacks empathy, but it’s just my opinion.Public defender addresses accused killer Mark Latunski's mental health history
Interesting to read what ML told his lawyer.
I’m sorry, but I have no sympathy for him and his mental health problems. He knows that he requires medication to function properly in society, and yet he goes off the medication. To me—and this is based on opinion—he is accountable for his actions while he was off his medication because he knew, when he was ON his medication, that he acts irrationally and improperly without it. Some will argue that people go off their medications because of unpleasant side effects. I might buy that once, but this person apparently has done it again and again. Furthermore, I don’t patients who are on chemotherapy for cancer suffer from unpleasant side effects. What happens if they go off their medication to avoid these side effects? We do what we have to do to stay healthy—whether physically or mentally—and when we don’t, consequences ensue. Forgive me if you believe my position lacks empathy, but it’s just my opinion.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.