How Flint water crisis emerged.
http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2015/10/how_the_flint_water_crisis_eme.html
http://www.mlive.com/news/flint/index.ssf/2015/10/how_the_flint_water_crisis_eme.html
Following this, and digging into why the replacement of lead pipes has been so deferred/ delayed. One source says half of the homes in Flint have lead supply pipes.And the giant pipes that supply the city could possibly be over a hundred years old like the ones that bring in Chicago's water supply. Why, why, why have those not been replaced??? Our infrastructure across the country is literally dissolving and crumbling.
http://www.metroplanning.org/news/6518/This-is-what-100-year-old-pipes-look-like
http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/...old-pipes-phillys-water-leak-rate-stays-high-
http://newsarchive.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news-221928.html
http://www.chicagolandh2o.org/documents/lake-michigan.pdf
Skipping ahead, the state of Michigan will be on the hook to the 100K residents of Flint for settlement $$ pretty much for the next 75-100 years, IMO. Scores of people will eventually be awarded "lead checks" funded by the state of Michigan, after all the lawsuits and settlements are conducted. Then the predatory agencies that buy structured settlements will move in, as they have in Baltimore.
I cannot fathom where the money is going to come from to pay all these people that will qualify for compensation.
This crisis has the potential to bankrupt Michigan in a way that will be more ongoing and permanent than the departure of the auto industry.
Monumentally sad and frustrating for the citizens of Flint, the State, and the other taxpayers that will have to pay for this. The cleanup of the water supply, bottled water, and filters, etc is but a tiny scratch in what this water crisis will cost over time.
Monsters! Should be tried for attemped homicide
Generally speaking, yes.
http://flintwaterstudy.org/2015/11/lead-contaminated-water-bathing-showering-concerns/
I believe we could have replaced them years ago if we weren't paying a certain segment of our dying cities to sit on their behinds and play the victim.
What segment is that?
The segment who sit on their behinds and collect tax-payer dollars - just like I said.
Sign me up!![]()
Except please provide potable water kthanks.
BBM. Yes, our infrastructure is crumbling and we have old pipes. I believe we could have replaced them years ago if we weren't paying a certain segment of our dying cities to sit on their behinds and play the victim. Now, are we going to pay them even more because of bad water? Probably. My town had "bad" water for quite a while. No one cared, nor did we receive compensation.
You have to wonder what the differences are in this country and when you do, you may go berserk.
:cow:
The city's holiday break from water shutoff notices is over as officials say they will again start sending warnings to those behind on their bills.
However, some residents have expressed outrage over the fact they are being billed for water they cannot drink without filtration due to elevated lead levels found in water in some Flint homes.
Why are you blaming welfare recipients in a dying town for their government covering up contamined water? Are you saying the government didn't have the money to fix this issue because they were too busy paying for food stamps? How about using some of the defense budget to fix the infrastructure? How about raising taxes on the rich? But no it's the "poor and lazy" who are responsible. These people were poisoned, and will deal with the consequences for the rest of their lives, and you're blaming them? I guess you're sort of right...If these people were middle-class, there's no way the issue wouldn't be fixed right away.
I would also be interested in hearing the story of contiminated water in yokur town. The use of quotes around the word "bad" is making me think "bad" is subjective meaning it was never confirmed the water in your town was contiminated. Was it confirmed there was lead poisioning? Was this before people knew about the dangers? Was it covered up by the government?
Why are you blaming welfare recipients in a dying town for their government covering up contamined water? Are you saying the government didn't have the money to fix this issue because they were too busy paying for food stamps? How about using some of the defense budget to fix the infrastructure? How about raising taxes on the rich? But no it's the "poor and lazy" who are responsible. These people were poisoned, and will deal with the consequences for the rest of their lives, and you're blaming them? I guess you're sort of right...If these people were middle-class, there's no way the issue wouldn't be fixed right away.
I would also be interested in hearing the story of contiminated water in your town. The use of quotes around the word "bad" is making me think "bad" is subjective meaning it was never confirmed the water in your town was contiminated. Was it confirmed there was lead poisioning? Was this before people knew about the dangers? Was it covered up by the government?
I think while everyone decides what should happen next in Flint, it's important to remember that the water supply was changed back to the Detroit supply lines the beginning of October 2015. The current water flowing in Detroit is the same "cleanliness" level as it was before the switch to the Flint River source-- but the current worry is that the more acidic water that flowed for 15 months or so "softened" or dissolved more of the inside of the current lead pipes. It isn't known yet what the ongoing effect at the taps are, and residents are being urged to submit samples every few weeks. (Authorities want 500 samples per month minimum to evaluate what is currently going on.)
The federal emergency grant is only 5 million, and will only cover roughly 3 months of emergency water, testing, and filters for residents. The request for a major disaster declaration was denied, because the current situation is not a natural disaster.
The REAL "ongoing" situation, as I see it, is 3 fold-- the issues related to the cover up, the current deteriorating pipes made of lead that the city/ state IS responsible for (not the lead pipes and solder within the older residences, which are the responsibility of the landlords), and the effect of the lead on the youngest children who were exposed for 15 months.
It is the last of those three that is the most worrisome from a public health perspective, as the other two can be solved with enough collective resolve and money.
Adults will not suffer many long term effects from short term lead exposure, but the kids who have high levels that aren't treated will have myriad social and educational issues for decades from the permanent damage of the neurotoxin (and the resultant effects on society, and the inevitable costs to compensate and manage those affected.)
There are some very robust (IMO) longitudinal studies that have positively correlated violent criminality with increased lead levels during early childhood, which I know is controversial. (And no, I'm not "blaming the victims here-- just pointing out some of the social concerns beyond ADHD and low educational and job achievement.) Those longitudinal studies looked at the issues in thousands of children in several countries (China had one of the biggest longitudinal studies) after leaded gasoline was removed. (Exposure to, and breathing aerosolized lead.) When the gas was changed, the levels of lead plummeted, and violent crime decreased proportionately as the unaffected next generation of kids moved into their teens and twenties. Just a large amount of social problems result from lead poisoning of young kids-- piling onto the existing problems of poverty and social circumstances. But it's a delayed impact, and not easily envisioned while the kids are still very young. And kids with high lead levels are completely asymptomatic-- they have no outward evidence of the effects of a high blood level of lead, so it's a hidden condition that manifests as the child grows up, in their behavior and academic achievement. Very, very sad and frustrating.
I just don't understand why no one wants to foot the money to replace the crumbling lead pipes-- even if politicians are heartless about the damage to children's brains and the impact on their futures, spend the money to eliminate THAT as part of the problem. It's a no-brainer, IMO. I guess crumbling pipes aren't sexy enough to "sell" to the public. City water should be clean and safe in every city in America, from the point in which it is supplied to homes and businesses. IMO.
At the beginning of my career (30 years ago) when I worked pediatrics in the Cleveland area, we used to have lots of low income kids in for chelation, which used to be a very unpleasant therapy several days to a week in length. Giving those kids BAL IM shots every few hours was one of the most heart wrenching things I ever had to do as a new RN-- the stuff was thick and oily, and incredibly painful for those little ones to get in their backside muscles-- and they had IV med infusions on top of that. Miserable for them. I don't know if they still use the same drugs, or do that therapy the same way now. I hope it's easier for the kids now.
Not all kids will be recommended for chelation-- I think their levels have to be in the 40's before they do that course of therapy. FDA currently says greater than 10 is a worrisome level, and some advocate lowering it to 5.
http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/lead_levels_in_children_fact_sheet.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/blood_lead_levels.htm
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/P...ures/InVitroDiagnostics/LabTest/ucm126101.htm
Every kid in Flint needs to be tested, IMO, and very soon.
The Governor asked the Federal Government to replace all the pipes in Flint at a cost estimated to be 3/4 of a BILLION dollars. The President declined.
I hope I got that right, I was partly listening to and heard it on the Rachel Maddow Show.