GreenEyedGirl
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2005
- Messages
- 589
- Reaction score
- 4
Quite awhile!!Pook said:
Michael Jackson In Serious Condition
- Thread starter concernedperson
- Start date
BrendaStar
New Member
Just read this on Fox News.
So the King of Flop hasn't bought the farm yet. :bang: :bang: At least not this time.......
So the King of Flop hasn't bought the farm yet. :bang: :bang: At least not this time.......
He has been in drug treatment before, so nothing would shock me. I feel sorry he has thrown away a career. As a child, I used to enjoy the Jackson 5 as well as the Osmonds. When MJ was about 15 he was a good looking kid. So talanted and full of energy. Now he is a freak who has never been a good judge of character. What a waste of a god given talent. So many women he could have had a wonderful life with, yet he wanted little boys. All so very sad.:doh:
I agree, i loved him when i was in 3rd grade..I remember my dad bringing me home a hot pink small purse with MJ pic on it and a belt that said "I love michael" We all loved him....deandaniellws said:
Anyone else watch Law and Order...Special Victims tonight? They did a thinly veiled story about Michael Jackson tonight. Of course they changed the name, but the story was the same. Instead of the boy, they changed the victim to a girl. The child had leukemia. They even brought up the "Peter Pan" phrase. :doh:
http://www.newkerala.com/news.php?action=fullnews&id=64888
Jackson threatens action against drug lies
London: Pop superstar Michael Jackson has lashed out at claims that he is getting into drink and drugs and has warned people spreading rumours to be prepared for legal battles
Jackson threatens action against drug lies
London: Pop superstar Michael Jackson has lashed out at claims that he is getting into drink and drugs and has warned people spreading rumours to be prepared for legal battles
nanandjim
Former Member
As my mother used to say, "He is at death's door, and we're hoping the doctor will pull him through....'Becba said:
Pook said:sorry, but this photo looks like he's been dead for a while:
Aaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!! Holy crap, that's scary! That photo needs to come with a warning and disclaimer. I think I've been damaged just looking at it! Yikes. I think the zombies in Thriller looked better than that! :doh: I'm gonna have nightmares. Thanks, Pook! :slap:
deandaniellws said:
If it weren't "loosely" based on reality, this episode would be hilarious in how it closely resembles MJ and his last victim. I hope MJ has seen it, I think the original air date was in 2004, and hope it made him sick at how the world really sees him. Most of the world, there's no accouting for the fan's horrible taste. Of course, there's a twist at the end that has nothing to do with MJ but at least half the show does.
No kidding! I am sure the writers were having fun with the stuff relating to the "treasure room" and the "Peter Pan" lines. Yes, I think most of the world sees him as a pedo freak. When Debbie Row states she was artificially inseminated, I am sure no one was shocked. However, I am wondering why he didn't use his own sperm. She states that the sperm donor was NOT MJ. I started thinking horrible things after I heard that. What if he is grooming those poor children to be his next thrill? Is that why he didn't use his own sperm? Does he draw the line at only molesting other people's children and not his own? If that why he used a donor? I hope I am traveling down the wrong path.shopper said:
concernedperson
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2004
- Messages
- 14,795
- Reaction score
- 130
deandaniellws said:No kidding! I am sure the writers were having fun with the stuff relating to the "treasure room" and the "Peter Pan" lines. Yes, I think most of the world sees him as a pedo freak. When Debbie Row states she was artificially inseminated, I am sure no one was shocked. However, I am wondering why he didn't use his own sperm. She states that the sperm donor was NOT MJ. I started thinking horrible things after I heard that. What if he is grooming those poor children to be his next thrill? Is that why he didn't use his own sperm? Does he draw the line at only molesting other people's children and not his own? If that why he used a donor? I hope I am traveling down the wrong path.
I don't think you are traveling down the wrong path. This is my worry that he has built objects around him to satisfy him when all others have failed. I.E. when he was acquited of other sexual charges he still needs to have a source.
I also think he is impotent. Sexually and in so many other ways. I think what we are hearing from publicists is attempts to keep their jobs.
deandaniellws said:No kidding! I am sure the writers were having fun with the stuff relating to the "treasure room" and the "Peter Pan" lines. Yes, I think most of the world sees him as a pedo freak. When Debbie Row states she was artificially inseminated, I am sure no one was shocked. However, I am wondering why he didn't use his own sperm. She states that the sperm donor was NOT MJ. I started thinking horrible things after I heard that. What if he is grooming those poor children to be his next thrill? Is that why he didn't use his own sperm? Does he draw the line at only molesting other people's children and not his own? If that why he used a donor? I hope I am traveling down the wrong path.
The Peter Pan comment was hilarious, they didn't go to great lengths to veil where they got this stuff.
Sexual perversion aside, I think he didn't use his own sperm because he hates his looks, obviously. Because his children would've looked like pre-cosmetic surgery Jacksons. Plus, I think he hates himself in general. But I'm clingling to the hope that he didn't father his own children for the reasons stated above, not for using them later for his sick, twisted brand of love. Poor PM1 is getting close to MJ's preferred age. :sick:
lisafremont
An open mind shouldn't mean an empty one!
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2004
- Messages
- 7,133
- Reaction score
- 23
May I just say that when I heard poor Mikey was a death's door by his own hand, I wanted to cheer. Yes!! Death is the only thing that will prevent him from predating other cute little boys and destroying their lives. The legal system was the preferred route but we have the Santa Maria idiots to thank for giving him a license to prey. So failing that, I have been hoping that he would slip just a wee bit too much Demerol in the syringe and chase it with a large dram of Jack Daniel's and just leave his ugly corpse.
I don't know what will happen to his poor pet children but I have to hope they will have a better life without him and his veils and his drugs and his perversions.
I don't know what will happen to his poor pet children but I have to hope they will have a better life without him and his veils and his drugs and his perversions.
concernedperson
Former Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2004
- Messages
- 14,795
- Reaction score
- 130
lisafremont said:
I think most of us are on the same page. I really worry about the children he has under his roof.They are so vulnerable. They are so not culpable. Just pawns in his game and it is disgusting.
Linda7NJ said:Oh I so agree.
I just wish his death came by MY hand!
As much as I find what I believe Michael Jackson to have done dispicable I don't feel his death or anyones death is a nice thing. I have to say I am a little uncomfortable with many of the responses I have seen in this thread. Kinda of cold and callus.
just my thoughts
mjak
Similar threads
