Michelle Young ~ Pregnant Mother NC Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
scandi said:
As I alway say, very interesting thoughts here! Hope you are all sitting a bit further away from your computers this morning. ;)

I agree with you about the possibility a suspicious light is being cast on Meredith. I even started to consider the facts about her. I do remember one specific statement made by one of these insiders, can't remember who said it, but it made what Meredith say look untrue.

I think it was Meredith that said there were bloody little footprints throughout the house. I know in the 911 tape she didn't specify they were only in the master bedroom. Then that fact was corrected to say the prints were only in the bedroom.

Correct me if I am wrong, as it could have come from a news report the prints were everywhere in the house. But to change this fact, someone is trying to tell us they have either been in the house to see this or have been told this directly or through the grapevine that they were only in the bedroom.

I don't believe them either and only think there is an agenda to support Jason from suspiscion.

Scandi

Hi Scandi - lol .... I've been away for almost a day, lol...

No, I certainly don't think you are wrong ... AT ALL. The more these 'leaks' come out by a perpetual anonymous poster, and don't make sense, and constantly refer to meredith (directly or indirectly) - the more I shake my head and don't read further. Poster's here update us (which is rgeat - thanks Floh) ... and I'm glad we hear what they're saying: makes ME all the more determined in my own views.

Lol - I'd far rather trust a voice that has a name, position, authorised access/voice to this case than a jtf constantly clearing Jason's name and muddying a stranger and, in particular, Merediths.

Imagine a close, dear, family friend or relative in this situation. Would you go against every rule in the book and post non-stop counter-attacks against that person? Unlikely; it's counter=productive, imo. (OK, maybe Lee and Jackie did... but then I rest my case).

Hope you're having a lovely T/Giving. Charlie is saving me a Turkey Sambo Ilocal jargon for sandwich, heh) ... and close may throw a piece of pumpkin pie my way. So - cyber diet is great this T/Giving...

:blowkiss: to all

PSA
 
  • #662
close_enough said:
wow, hmmmmmm then she's killed with this next child inside her...........

i dont know about yall, & i'm probably wrong, but i think JTF is a very dear friend JY's family....jmo

Or .... mayb ..... direct family? Possible step-family ????

Well, that's one step-dad who came rushing out with his thoughts, laid down his law, spoke for JY and showed his 'knowledge in these things'. JMO. MOO.... etc
 
  • #663
close_enough said:
OK, <snip>

i dont know about yall, & i'm probably wrong, but i think JTF is a very dear friend JY's family....jmo
I think that is possible based on several comments made that really have nothing to do with the case and the obvious indignation over some topics. However that being the case and if they believe JY had nothing to do with this, they have an even stronger reason to have an agenda. I feel sorry for them if this is the case but it doesn't mean I'm going to blindly fall into their line of thinking. And I would think if JY is indeed arrested, they may well not be happy about somethings they have put forth.
 
  • #664
raisincharlie said:
Honesty, I could be very far off base on this but what I took from the conversation is it really isn't all related to the media per se. Way too indignate for a person who wants the truth known and the crime solved - the press can be very powerful and useful if used correctly. Me thinks (dangerous) there have been some questions asked by LE that don't necessarily reflect well on a certain person...JMO.

you're right raisin....i think some of JY's friends (real friends) are probably pissed off about some of the questions LE is asking them....i think LE has reason to believe JY did this, & in investigating they MAY have gotten wind of some 'not so nice' info about him, which they're relaying to his friends, when questioning them....
 
  • #665
I love dogs dearly - so this commom thought is for want of an expression of "karma", only:

"Every dog has its day - but an uncouth mongrel gets to have its weekend...."

The uncouth pavement walker-stalker in this case will get his just dues.
 
  • #666
PolkSaladAnnie said:
Or .... mayb ..... direct family? Possible step-family ????
Well, that's one step-dad who came rushing out with his thoughts, laid down his law, spoke for JY and showed his 'knowledge in these things'. JMO. MOO.... etc

yep yep...there's no telling who these folks are....
 
  • #667
:laugh:
raisincharlie said:
ssshhh - I'm trying to see how the press is wrongly accusing the guy holed up in the Miami Herald....:D
 
  • #668
Agggg! WHY don't the paparazzi ever stalk our cases and throw us some inside scoop everynow and then? Can't they see we're Sleuths Extraordinaire? They could try reverse photographer-hounding:

"THEY talk ... WE get the picture!"
 
  • #669
PolkSaladAnnie said:
close - did you ever hear/read the book about Sister Paula - who brought dogs to correctional services in USA to give female inmates 'direction' and a reason to contribute back to society? This doubled up to the demand by folks with special needs. Well, after a looooooooong story (heartbreaking - fantastic true story) ... these dogs PROVED that they were able to sense when one woman, an epileptic, was going to have a fit - BEFORE the epilepsy symptoms came on to humans.

Also: animals/ ogs can tell thurnderstorms long before they 'hit' ground; they're know to yelp and whine LONG before earthquakes; look at the animals that were able to flee the Tusnami and the reports of how these animals 'went berserk'; a separate incident - one dog saved his blind master's life from a stroke by bringing the cordless to his 'master' and yelping. As incrdible as this sounds, it is true ... the guy started to feel unwell with pains, he managed to call emergency, mumble and then left the phone on the sofa. The emergency op heard the dog yelping and immediately sent police and an ambulance - they got there in time.

Stories abound how the Young's dog was very much part of the household; took the wedding rings down the aisle. This wa a cherished, loved and well cared for animal. He/she would have been protective of Michelle - I can quite understand the dog 'freaking out' until someone came.

There's no such thing as a bad dog; there are bad owners.

This latest entry by jtf continues an agenda: nothing more, IMO! (Sorry so long ... but doggies are my heart, lol!)

i hadn't heard of Sister Paula, but it sounds interesting, Polk......don't get me wrong, i DO think there's an 'agenda' of some kind going on over 'there', but it seems to me, these folks seem to REALLY think JY is innocent, which is understandable since there's not been any REAL SOLID leads given to the public yet....

another thought popped into my head.....wonder if JY (or the perp) DID have a ski mask on...Ocean wondered about this also, & i had responded by saying it's possible, & then maybe the perp took it off once they knew Michelle was dead.....either way, a dog would know it's 'master's' smell....hmmmmmm
 
  • #670
tossing Polk a piece of chess pie....lol, we didn't have pumpkin:)
 
  • #671
scandi said:
One thing I never got clear was about the alarm system in the house that was talked about on Greta. Does anyone know about it, whether they had one and if it had been set?

Scandi

haven't heard a thing about an alarm system being in the home....Greta had a 'tease' about it one night, but then it was nothing....she said that a NEIGHBOR had a sign out front showing THEY had security, but nothing about the Young's having it.....
 
  • #672
close_enough said:
i hadn't heard of Sister Paula, but it sounds interesting, Polk......don't get me wrong, i DO think there's an 'agenda' of some kind going on over 'there', but it seems to me, these folks seem to REALLY think JY is innocent, which is understandable since there's not been any REAL SOLID leads given to the public yet....

another thought popped into my head.....wonder if JY (or the perp) DID have a ski mask on...Ocean wondered about this also, & i had responded by saying it's possible, & then maybe the perp took it off once they knew Michelle was dead.....either way, a dog would know it's 'master's' smell....hmmmmmm
Knowing that smell wouldn't make a dog suspicious in the night either...no need to alert. If the perp closed the bedroom door and hit MY while she was sleeping, would the dog know there was something wrong ? Dogs are also incredibly forgiving.
 
  • #673
j2mirish said:
ya'll must thingk I am defending jason- cause I throw a few posts out there and ya'll disappear--- I feel like major posting killer here !!


Hope everyone has a safe and fabulous holiday--- happy thanksgiving--:blowkiss:

j2m

no, i don't think you're defending anyone....you're 'on the fence' & there's nothing wrong w/that.....:)
 
  • #674
raisincharlie said:
Knowing that smell wouldn't make a dog suspicious in the night either...no need to alert. If the perp closed the bedroom door and hit MY while she was sleeping, would the dog know there was something wrong ? Dogs are also incredibly forgiving.

yep, yep...loyal to the end, they are!
 
  • #675
Ooops, we have now gone from the May 6th date to perhaps it was the 29th.

:slap:
 
  • #676
I read this person's posts over at ctv, and IMO, they appear to have an agenda, to take suspcion off JY. For all we know, it could be JY himself, imo.

The mods at WS usually advise people who are 'friends or family' of victims, it would be best for them to not read the blogs etc, as it will only cause them undue pain and anguish. (especially if they feel the person being spoken of as the perp) is innocent.

Like I said before, this person or people over on the ctv board that claim to be 'friends' of the Youngs would be more believable had they not insinuated first, that Michelle may have been having an affair and the baby may not have been JY's. I see now they've stopped that and are just talking about what a loving, wonderful, yadda, yadda, husband and father JY is and that's why he's not talking. Ehhh...........but they're talking about him talking to the media.

So my question is, why isn't he talking to LE? Other than a couple of minutes talking about LE impounding his vehicle and the SW on the house and his alibi, I haven't heard of him talking to the police. Why?

IF he wanted LE to solve this crime, he'd voluntarily have already been in headquarters, even accompanied by his attorney, to tell them everything he knows. Like I said, he may know something, although insignificant to him, may be a key to solving the case.

Sorry, I CANNOT rule out JY. He's still my #1 POI.

JMHO
fran
 
  • #677
raisincharlie said:
Ooops, we have now gone from the May 6th date to perhaps it was the 29th.

:slap:

yep, i saw that too, lol.....i'm going to stop thinking about the 'accident' for now....i just asked JTF a question....
 
  • #678
fran said:
I read this person's posts over at ctv, and IMO, they appear to have an agenda, to take suspcion off JY. For all we know, it could be JY himself, imo.

The mods at WS usually advise people who are 'friends or family' of victims, it would be best for them to not read the blogs etc, as it will only cause them undue pain and anguish. (especially if they feel the person being spoken of as the perp) is innocent.

Like I said before, this person or people over on the ctv board that claim to be 'friends' of the Youngs would be more believable had they not insinuated first, that Michelle may have been having an affair and the baby may not have been JY's. I see now they've stopped that and are just talking about what a loving, wonderful, yadda, yadda, husband and father JY is and that's why he's not talking. Ehhh...........but they're talking about him talking to the media.

So my question is, why isn't he talking to LE? Other than a couple of minutes talking about LE impounding his vehicle and the SW on the house and his alibi, I haven't heard of him talking to the police. Why?

IF he wanted LE to solve this crime, he'd voluntarily have already been in headquarters, even accompanied by his attorney, to tell them everything he knows. Like I said, he may know something, although insignificant to him, may be a key to solving the case.

Sorry, I CANNOT rule out JY. He's still my #1 POI.

JMHO
fran

he's still mine too Fran...

'concernedcitiz' is the one that first brought that up, (in the bold letters) so i've taken a LOT of their posts with a grain of salt.....but that's just me..
 
  • #679
close_enough said:
yep, i saw that too, lol.....i'm going to stop thinking about the 'accident' for now....i just asked JTF a question....
The only thing that accident says to me, since we know the police checked into it, is that JY is a POI whether anyone in the family or close to the family wants to admit it or not. I don't know of any reason why one would look into that considering JY was driving the vehicle and could have well killed himself as well if they are strongly suspecting someone else. By the time this was looked into - the alibi should have been firm - something doesn't add up. JMO.
 
  • #680
raisincharlie said:
The only thing that accident says to me, since we know the police checked into it, is that JY is a POI whether anyone in the family or close to the family wants to admit it or not. I don't know of any reason why one would look into that considering JY was driving the vehicle and could have well killed himself as well if they are strongly suspecting someone else. By the time this was looked into - the alibi should have been firm - something doesn't add up. JMO.

very good point, raisin....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
3,435
Total visitors
3,577

Forum statistics

Threads
632,568
Messages
18,628,489
Members
243,198
Latest member
Angi7275
Back
Top