Why would "we" be in error? We are not the detectives on this case and the ones who are have determined it was DM's Yukon. The proof of that will be shown at trial. We don't even have any indication that DM is disputing that. Or do we?
You're quoting early information which was speculation from Hamilton LE based on early incoming information. The investigation has progressed and a task force set up. LE no longer believed there was a threat to the community in regards to a third person after the date of that article. In fact Det Kavanaugh said it would be "tunnel vision" to keep believing that there was a third person. He also thought it would be tunnel vision to declare there definitely was not.
“As an investigator, you always talk about tunnel vision and I think it’d be tunnel vision for me to say that I definitely believe there’s a third person or to say there wasn’t,” Staff Sergeant Matt Kavanagh said Wednesday. “It’s possible that there’s only two involved and it’s also possible that there may have been a third. And so we’re looking into that and we still have some doors to shut, some avenues of investigation.”
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...ird-suspect-in-bosma-killing/article12370401/
I guess they shut those doors during their investigation. Good thing those detectives don't have tunnel vision.
Why would the murder have to occur while driving? Can't the driver, who has control of the vehicle, stop the vehicle? Even get out with keys leaving the passenger stranded and vulnerable. My logic goes there. Not some contortionist murder with a vehicle in motion. Hey maybe it was in the area where TB's phone was found.
Regarding the burner phone. No idea if they have it but they have the number, which lead to the provider and means they have the records of every phone number that was communicating with that phone via voice or text. No possible way to block numbers from the phone providers even if you block them from your contacts. Cool how that works isn't it?
MOO