Its interesting, if you watch one of the videos she says, We called and called and no on answered, so we decided to go by the house. Uh, (a pause) then says, We had never been there before. So it makes it kind of sound like she almost slipped up and felt she had to add that they had never been there. I've always wondered if this was the case. She says they went over to the house, then says they had never been there before. So it kind of says two things to me. One, she's trying to distance herself from the house and her knowledge of the house. And she's also screwing up and not really explaining at all how she knew where the girls lived, if she had never been there before. You'd think she would clarify this issue while she's telling the story, if she went to so much effort to state that they had never been there before. You'd think the first logical question would be, how did you know where they lived. Not to mention, if you'd never been there before, clearly you weren't that close to Susie because she had lived there for a few months already. Then she acts like the dog is happy to see her, how can this be the case if she's not that close to Susie, and if that's the case, why did she also feel comfortable being so casual about going into the house and lingering around, answering the phone, and other things. Makes a person wonder.
