Missouri - The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #9

[SpringfieldMan341]

Can you show us all the proof you have that makes Janelle innocent?

I seriously want to see what proof you have and surely if you have such proof you could hand it over to LE 59 narrow down the suspect pool.

The onus of proof is on you to prove she isn't.

Janelle had an alibi last I checked.

 

[MooseMeMuch]

Missouri - The Springfield Three--missing since June 1992 - #8

Right here. Post #204...look at the article. Cops own words.

Very likely she was the sole target.

and so...she still deserves justice.

 

[SpringfieldMan341]

and so...she still deserves justice.

No one is saying she doesn't?

 

[asyousay]

The onus of proof is on you to prove she isn't.

Here is your proof: she has an alibi.

Show me the proof the Grave Robbers are completely innocent in this.

No you claim she is innocent so back that up, she doesn’t have a alibi. She was at that house and unattended for many a hour and could of literally of done anything for all the world knows.

 

[SpringfieldMan341]

No you claim she is innocent so back that, she doesn’t have a alibi. She was at that house and unattended for many a hour. Fact!!!

She's a suspect like everyone in Springfield is a suspect.

Unfounded. Someone had to discover them missing. The crime happened at Delmar. If Janelle is responsible for this awful crime why did she stop at killing Sherrill? Why didn't they go after other family members? Other friends? The makeup being taken off proves they entered the house.

 

[Scooby Doo 4U]

No you claim she is innocent so back that up, she doesn’t have a alibi. She was at that house and unattended for many a hour and could of literally of done anything for all the world knows.

Agreed! How could anyone just dismiss all of the things that don't seem right about she and mikes actions, statements, and lack of alibi for at least one, and changing stories and timelines.

 

[SpringfieldMan341]

Agreed! How could anyone just dismiss all of the things that don't seem right about she and mikes actions, statements, and lack of alibi for at least one, and changing stories and timelines.

The paper misprint and corrected timelines several times. It took them several times to nail down when Oliveras called Sherrill.

Janelle had the same story in Disappeared as 48 Hours and in 2002's KSPR/KY3 interview.....

 

[Scooby Doo 4U]

No you claim she is innocent so back that up, she doesn’t have a alibi. She was at that house and unattended for many a hour and could of literally of done anything for all the world knows.

And I'll add, for someone who claimed to have solid plans to go to white water, she only made one trip to the house, and after finding what they did, didn't return or alert anyone until at least 7:30pm. And it wasn't them that contacted Ms. McCall, it was one of Ms. McCall's friends according to the media reports. How can their actions just be dismissed?

 

[Scooby Doo 4U]

The paper misprint and corrected timelines several times. It took them several times to nail down when Oliveras called Sherrill.

Janelle had the same story in Disappeared as 48 Hours and in 2002's KSPR/KY3 interview.....

No she didn't. Her timeline changed from her starting to call at 7:30am, to her starting to call at 8:30am-9:00am. No one ever called her out on her "That Other Girl" statement either. Why did she say it that way. People just don't talk like that. And why does it appear that she is Feigning crying when asked to speak at the candle light vigil. Just my opinion, but take a good look at her face when they ask her to speak.

 

[asyousay]

She's a suspect like everyone in Springfield is a suspect.

Unfounded. Someone had to discover them missing. The crime happened at Delmar. If Janelle is responsible for this awful crime why did she stop at killing Sherrill? Why didn't they go after other family members? Other friends? The makeup being taken off proves they entered the house.

So you admit Janelle is a suspect and isn’t innocent now?

Nobody is in the clear in this crime due to the fact it’s unsolved.

I have never claimed Janelle killed them if you look at my posts. I have just maintained she knows more than she was letting on in her little woven tale she told LE.

 

[SpringfieldMan341]

So you admit Janelle is a suspect and isn’t innocent now?

Nobody is in the clear in this crime due to the fact it’s unsolved.

I have never claimed Janelle killed them if you look at my posts. I have just maintained she knows more than she was letting on in her little woven tale she told LE.

Yeah but I need proof. Wild speculating is aliens/boogie man stuff.

Levitt was target.

You think cops were played by an 18 year old? FBI would have saw right through that. SPD and FBI statements rule out Janelle too.

 

[SpringfieldMan341]

I have just maintained she knows more than she was letting on in her little woven tale she told LE.

And what difference does that make? I don't think she did it. Even if she knows, what does that mean? How do you get the real killers then from that?

It's Wild Speculation City.

 

[asyousay]

And what difference does that make? I don't think she did it. Even if she knows, what does that mean? How do you get the real killers then from that?

It's Wild Speculation City.

So is your theory with the drugs so pot kettle.

Don’t pretend like your theory is somehow more valid than others when you have no proof to back what you claim.

At least my theory with Janelle holds water when you consider her behavior that day.

 

[Scooby Doo 4U]

Yeah but I need proof. Wild speculating is aliens/boogie man stuff.

Levitt was target.

You think cops were played by an 18 year old? FBI would have saw right through that. SPD and FBI statements rule out Janelle too.

I don't think anyone said they committed the crime. But their actions made no sense and police didn't think so either. Think about it for a second. Kathy Kirby provides an alibi for her daughter by saying she heard the girls leave her house saying they were headed to Susie's, and that she hers her daughter enter the house. What are the police suppose to do? If her mother is providing an alibi and no one is refuting it, that pretty much ties her hands. Why did police go back and question her several times according to the media reports? And Mike H. can't provide a provable alibi three months into the investigation. What are police suppose to do. They cant confirm nor deny any alibi for him, nor prove legally that he did anything wrong because of a lack of evidence. Who knows what happened or if they had a part in it or not? Mike H became an abusive alcoholic who Janelle had to take a restraining order out on, and has multiple DWI/DUI convictions. He also had a paternity test later in 1992 I believe it was, that proved he was the father of another woman's child. But then marries Janelle later. Had he broken up with her when the paternity test was conducted? Or was he fooling around on her? And if he was, could he have been trying to do that the night of the crime as well? Yes its pure speculation, but some of it is not speculation but fact.

 

[asyousay]

Yeah but I need proof. Wild speculating is aliens/boogie man stuff.

Levitt was target.

You think cops were played by an 18 year old? FBI would have saw right through that. SPD and FBI statements rule out Janelle too.

Again you have zero proof that Levitt was the target. It actually makes zero sense that she was the target that evening as if she was there was many hours for her to be kidnapped before the girls had even gotten home.

If the house was being watched then waiting until nearly dawn makes zero sense from a criminal point of view.

 

[k-mac]

<modsnip - quoted post has been removed>

everything stated about Janelle and mike is on the record.

free tos discussion.

if it grinds your gears thats irrelevant.

if you want to dizz the information we have from the case that's your right to ignorance.

scroll and roll.

<modsnip - discussing other poster>

but we can keep going round and round and round .
I don't mind because its a chance to go over it again....keeps it current.....most of the others don't mind either

jmo

 

[Scooby Doo 4U]

And what difference does that make? I don't think she did it. Even if she knows, what does that mean? How do you get the real killers then from that?

It's Wild Speculation City.

What difference does it make if she knows what happened? Really? It would make all the difference in the world, and could mean the difference between solving the crime and it never being solved.

 

[SpringfieldMan341]

Again you have zero proof that Levitt was the target. It actually makes zero sense that she was the target that evening as if she was there was many hours for her to be kidnapped before the girls had even gotten home.

If the house was being watched then waiting until nearly dawn makes zero sense from a criminal point of view.

Zero sense? You can't find any inkling of sense that there might be to make Levitt a target? Or at least a combination target with Suzie?

 

[k-mac]

So you admit Janelle is a suspect and isn’t innocent now?

Nobody is in the clear in this crime due to the fact it’s unsolved.

I have never claimed Janelle killed them if you look at my posts. I have just maintained she knows more than she was letting on in her little woven tale she told LE.

exactly
nobody has ever uttered the words or implied Janelle killed anybody.

is she part of a bigger picture.....well that's where all her case evidence points.
proof???no...suspicious and worthy of breakdown.?? yes
which is all that gets down here.

think there might be a personal connection floating around....AGAIN.
the you cant talk about Janelle stuff is just ridiculous.

imo

 

[Missouri Mule]

<modsnip - reference to removed post>

But I decided to simply do a Google search of this case. I found this quote dated February 14, 1993 from the Springfield News-Leader that was written by Thomas Gourley. To my knowledge this has never been disavowed. It reads as follows:

‘For the first time, police announce they are considering the possibility that the disappearances are the work of one or more serial killers.”

This compilation of events since the beginning of the case was written on May 30, 2017.

There are a number of news articles appearing on the Google search.