Nope, If I had any control over the situation, PTL would not be in the picture period.
That's just it. It seems like a pretty big risk no matter who did the driving there.
Nope, If I had any control over the situation, PTL would not be in the picture period.
On Dec 18th at 1:13:55am, while SM is inside Walmart, SM's cell phone is turned off. This was on the call log presented at trial as well as mentioned in this thread, page 48.
The cell phone stays off until it's turned back on around 3am-ish, and SM's cell phone and Heather's cell phone are connected via a nearly 5 minute call at 3:14am. SM admitted to police he was speaking to Heather on that call. Heather was supposedly at or near her apartment when she made this call to SM. SM's cell was supposedly at or near his home when this call was answered.
There was no location information for SM's phone that early morning that put his phone (or his truck) at Long Beards. It could be because he was never there or because the phone was not turned on if he was there.
I thought he wasn't specific about the time.Wait, did he admit to that call? I thought he only admitted to the earlier call, the pay phone call. I'm sorry I can't remember!!
Wait, did he admit to that call? I thought he only admitted to the earlier call, the pay phone call. I'm sorry I can't remember!!
BBM -- That has always been my understanding. SM told investigators he made the pay phone call to tell Heather to leave him alone. The pay phone call is the only call he made to Heather. She did call SM's phone and talked to someone at 3:17 for 4-mins. I'm not aware that he actually admitted to talking to her at that time tho. We know someone answered SM's phone and talked to her.
He said in his interview that he called her (the day she was last seen) and told her to stop leaving notes on his car and to stop calling; it wasn't what she thought it was, etc. I don't when he would have us believe this call was made, or why he would go there given the log. But perhaps he intended to tie this to the pay phone, which of course poses the question of why at that hour. Obviously, she called him after that so that's not his reference.
I only know the pay phone call is the only outgoing call on record from Sidney to Heather that day. Knowing that, I have always assumed this is the call he admitted to making.
Here's my theory on that: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...VIDENCE-Pro-and-Con-2&p=12660010#post12660010
True that is the only outgoing call he admitted to, after at first lying about it. <mod snip>
Conflicted feelings don't fit the 15 outgoing phone calls. Does not fit the extreme hysterical reaction either. IMO
This is nothing against Heather. The best of humans don't always tell the truth.
OR- Heather asked him 'what number are you calling me from?' and SM said 'I'm at work at LB's, so I'm using their payphone'. Then after thinking about it for a while, HE decided to go there and talk to him in person. She gets there and he's not there, neither is his truck, so then she starts calling the phones trying to make contact again.
-theory only-
OR- if SM does maintenance at LB's, he would know if there were any security cameras outside or not. The arrangement may have been to meet there, and that is where HE was overcome, and from then on SM was driving HE's car and TM was in his truck, and for whatever reason, T went back to their home before meeting at PTL for the car drop off, so SM kept calling her using HE's phone.
More theory.
Because she was a <modsnip> kid who hadn't grown up yet. Still not able to see that people are not all good, even if you care about them and they say they care about you. After that call, she probably started thinking all her dreams might be coming true.
It's not just her, it's most of them. Been there, done that.
Glad to be in my 50's and generally don't believe anything anyone says.
MOO
That pay phone conversation has more content than we know about, and perhaps that BW knows about. Seriously, if HE reported to BW that SM had asked specifically in the pay phone call to see her that morning, and had given her a meeting place, it would have served the state's lure claim to have that brought up in testimony.
BW's testimony was largely about who HE was, their friendship, HE's lifestyle and family conflicts, her residence transitions, and her affair dynamics and escalations with the SM/TM triangle. The testimony about the critical phone call was minimal and provided little insight into the evolution of the call, why SM decided to announce his wife-leaving at that hour, and how he and HE ended the call and where they left things. I find this rather remarkable.
The conversation lasted five minutes. There has to be more content. Why so many outgoing phone calls. What was the urgency that couldn't wait.ullhair:
Thanks TTF. I did read your well thought out theory when you first posted it.
If Heather was abducted from or killed at LB's, why move her car to PTL. Why not just leave it in the LB parking lot, a safe distance from their home.
I don't think HE told everything that was talked about with SM. IMO, she knew her roommate didn't approve, and when she called Bri, she was told more of less to forget him and not meet him, and let it go. How much more she would have said if probed, who knows! But it appears it wasn't a "what else did he say? How are you feeling about it? What are you thinking? What did you say? Etc" conversation between Bri and HE.