http://greaterminnesota.kstp.com/ne...ve-interview-jacob-wetterling-person-interest - 14 min interview w/DR from 2010; I found link on one of the Case Facts pages.
http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/video...est-goes-through-day-of-wetterling-abduction/ - WCCO interview w/DR.
I personally find this pretty interesting. A 14 min interview with DR, in 2010; it was after he was named POI and after the 2010 search of his property/house, which are talked about. I remember thinking, years back, when I was younger, (recently turned 60), but, I remember how I used to think that I'd be able to spot a Liar, and that just by watching, observing someone, under certain circumstances that, I'd be able to tell if someone is being or trying to be deceitful. However, I've followed truckloads of true crime, mainly on television for several years now, and it's amazing how so many people can seem perfectly sincere while they are being perfectly deceitful! Really, it's amazing! Having said that, sometimes, I am able to spot when someone is being deceitful, and/or, to rule someone else out as being sincere; by saying this, I mean that as I'm coming to conclusions as I'm watching a particular show (documentary type) and I'm trying to get a sense of who is being up front, and who is being deceitful, then I'm able to tell when the show progresses and reveals who's who, that I had it right as to who was lying or not.
I'm having to be Really, really cautious and reserved concerning DR. Watching this, and the other interview that I linked to a couple of days ago (I guess I'll just link to it again here) by WCCO, that he seems pretty straight forward to me, along with what I've read about him on Joy's Blog. He appears to be actually interested in having the case solved, if even for selfish reasons, because, he feels that having the case solved is the only thing that will be able to actually clear him. If he is in fact completely innocent; he's really put up with a lot from LE for a long time, a great many years.
I'm not making a case here that he's innocent or anything else, just making some observations; for whatever it's worth.
Something I noticed about this interview; the 14 min one; if you want to watch it Full Screen and you have to do that to be able to manipulate the controls, such as pause, back up, go forward, volume control, etc..., you have to select Full Screen before you hit play. If you just hit Play when it's in the small screen when you open the page, then it just plays, and you can't make it full screen or manipulate the pause, volume or anything.
Seems like there was something else that I had intended on including in this post; so, if I think of it, I'll have to include it in an edit.
During the interview, they speak about something about blood on a cedar chest, also something about an umbrella stand; well, this has been done in 2010; if there were anything of significance, especially concerning any blood, then there would have been action taken by now. Also interesting; one of the items listed on the search warrant was a 'silver hand gun' and DR says that neither he nor his father/family own or have ever owned any hand guns. It seems to me that with all the investigating that's gone on in this case, for so long, that if he and/or even his father had owned a hand gun that it would have been found out by now. And, it seems kind of significant, concerning the significance of a hand gun in this case, and other possibly related cases.
