That comment was in regards to discussion about documenting
to which clearly that book was a very important historical document. I am not exploiting the holocaust. I myself have been keeping documentation of current events to be able to share with family later on. We are in historical times right now.
I believe that some exploitation of the Holocaust theme is inappropriate.
For example, the side-to-side photo of Pretti being shot (pistol to his head)
And a man, sitting on the border of a trench, with a Nazi German putting a pistol to his head -
IMHO, should not be used for two reasons:
- considering the feelings of Pretti’s family
- and considering that the other (Holocaust-time) picture represents the last of the Jews executed in Vinnitsa, a Ukrainian city, during Nazi occupation.
I have seen it in many SMs and while I can understand the wish to deliver a powerful message, it is not that message.
Anne Frank’s diary is, and can be mentioned, IMHO. It is a very powerful document that transcends even the Holocaust and raises a lot of issues related to life, death, morality, the decision that people “not involved” might take.
Of non-Holocaust themes, the Stanford Prison Experiment by Phil Zimbardo (the book has a different name, “the Lucifer effect”) can be used.
Remember, as part of the experiment, Zimbardo deprived both “the prisoners” and the “guards” of names and (!) - the guards were allowed to wear masks.
The question of the legality of masked law enforcement can, and should, be raised when contacting our state representatives, IMHO.
JMO.