MN -- woman shot in face and killed by ICE, Minneapolis, 7 Jan 2026

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,081
  • #1,082
Can you believe Mr. Ross shot that lovely, smiling woman right in the face?!? They (the deceased and her wife) didn't appear frightened because they never would imagine in a million years that an ICE agent would shoot them in the face, unprovoked, for no reason.
And they were correct. Nobody shot them for blocking the road, nobody shot the passenger for using free speech to challenge officer, curse at him, video him etc

But... when she accelerated towards an officer, things changed.
 
  • #1,083
Yeah you did.
I said " I don't think she intended to run him over". One can intend, or not intend to do something and never complete the action.

I never said that she ran (competed action) him over.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,084
  • #1,085
There are some Olympic-level mental gymnastics on display here.
 
  • #1,086
I’ve watched every video I can find of what happened in Minnesota, and I cannot make it line up with the story being pushed. This does not look like an officer in danger. He wasn’t hit. He wasn’t injured. He wasn’t dragged. And someone who is truly afraid for their life does not casually call people “f*** b***” after pulling the trigger.

What bothers me just as much as the shooting is what is happening in the aftermath. The federal government immediately taking over, shutting out local investigators, and locking everything down. There is no transparency here. If the facts supported the official narrative, there would be no reason to keep state and local authorities in the dark. National figures rushing to defend lethal force before any independent investigation can happen sends a pretty clear message that accountability isn’t the priority.

We keep hearing “vehicle as a weapon” and “feared for his life,” but at some point words don’t matter when the video tells a different story. Expecting people to ignore what they can clearly see is straight-up gaslighting.

Maybe there will be justice. I hope there is. But this already feels like the kind of case that gets buried, and people are right to be angry about it. Renee Good is already being turned into a justification instead of a person.

All IMOO.
 
  • #1,087
And they were correct. Nobody shot them for blocking the road, nobody shot the passenger for using free speech to challenge officer, curse at him, video him etc

But... when she accelerated towards an officer, things changed.
She didn't accelerate towards him. The acceleration happened the moment he shot her. His cell phone video shows that very clearly.
 
  • #1,088
IMO creating a traffic issue is what she was trying to do because why park across the road for three minutes before ICE showed up?
Moo...the auto position was symbolic, she was not blocking the road completely. She was waving people thru. Yes she was there for a whole 3 minutes. It ends like a road rage incident....moo
 
  • #1,089
And they were correct. Nobody shot them for blocking the road, nobody shot the passenger for using free speech to challenge officer, curse at him, video him etc

But... when she accelerated towards an officer, things changed.
The latest video shows that the first shot comes BEFORE the car accelerates. He killed her in cold blood. And then called her a "🤬🤬🤬🤬**g b**ch". It's all on the video tape from HIS PHONE.
 
  • #1,090
Actually the newly released video proves he shot her FIRST, then her car accelerates because he killed her and she no longer had control of the vehicle, because she was dead or dying. But that wasn't enough for Mr. Ross, he had to chase her and shoot her two more times.
She hits the accelerator first. You can hear it even before a shot is fired. moo
 
  • #1,091
The latest video shows that the first shot comes BEFORE the car accelerates. He killed her in cold blood. And then called her a "🤬🤬🤬🤬**g b**ch". It's all on the video tape from HIS PHONE.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984
 
  • #1,092
One video on NBC does not appear to show frightened women in the vehicle.

Rather, one woman gets out of the vehicle and challenges the ICE officer repeatedly as to why he is filming the licence plate, as she is filming the officer. The driver looks directly at his camera (phone) and says something.

Neither seems frightened to me. But.... other people can have different spins.


Neither am I. And, I agree, the videos are out there.
That to me is what makes the video enlightening. I didn’t see fear or confusion. Imo
 
  • #1,093

Great video.

“Another aspect of the video Balliet commented on was the placement of the officers. Video shows three officers near the vehicle, two to the side and one directly in front of the vehicle.

"I don't understand the tactical or law enforcement advantage of someone on foot in front of a moving, running or occupied vehicle. You're almost inducing a shooting if that person decides to flee," he said.”
 
  • #1,094
She hits the accelerator first. You can hear it even before a shot is fired. moo
FALSE.
Borrowed from Rogue Ant: “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984
 
  • #1,095
Alpha News is not an approved source.

Please move on from discussion of the Alpha News video. The site has a terrible media/bias rating (untrustworthy, fake news, etc. )and when a source is that questionable, we aren't allowing discussion based on it.

We are removing discussion based it .. as soon as we can get to it all.
 
  • #1,096
That to me is what makes the video enlightening. I didn’t see fear or confusion. Imo
I think there is confusion, there’s several agents all around the car, some of them are telling the women different things and commands. The officer filming (who one who shot her) literally says nothing in the video. He never speaks to Renee or her wife. He makes a conscious decision to move his cell phone into his left hand (you can see this happen at the :15 second mark in the footage) Her car still isn’t moving at that point; her wife is trying to get in so they can leave. His right hand is now free to get his weapon, which he does within a split second and he takes the first shot (he shoots her at the :07 second mark when his phone get shaky). He was never fearful of her or her wife, IMO. He was pissed off that they were heckling him and he didn’t want to let her just drive away like she was trying to do. All MOO.
 
  • #1,097
That to me is what makes the video enlightening. I didn’t see fear or confusion. Imo
Yes,, so why did he escalate his actions and MURDER her? Hmm.
 
  • #1,098
Ya kinda did.
Note that I said "Hit, but not knocked off his feet" .

Though people can use the term "run over" to mean many different things, I would not consider being hit but not knocked off his feet to have been "run over".
 
  • #1,099
One video on NBC does not appear to show frightened women in the vehicle.

Rather, one woman gets out of the vehicle and challenges the ICE officer repeatedly as to why he is filming the licence plate, as she is filming the officer. The driver looks directly at his camera (phone) and says something.

Neither seems frightened to me. But.... other people can have different spins.


Neither am I. And, I agree, the videos are out there.

Why would she have been frightened at that point? Nobody was trying to get into her car or pointing a gun at her then!
 
  • #1,100
HERE^^^^^
"Intended to" is not a completed action. Rather, one can intend to do something, or not intend to do something and never complete the pertinent action.

I did not say: She ran (completed action) him over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
69
Guests online
2,298
Total visitors
2,367

Forum statistics

Threads
637,457
Messages
18,714,161
Members
244,129
Latest member
Maliyah
Back
Top