MN -- woman shot in face and killed by ICE, Minneapolis, 7 Jan 2026

[Curious Me]

Minneapolis ICE shooting live updates: New video shows different vantage point​

Minneapolis ICE shooting live updates: New video shows different vantage point

The 37-second cellphone video is one of several circulating of the incident.

www.yahoo.com

ABC News has obtained a cellphone video showing the moments leading up to the shooting of Renee Good in her vehicle and through the shots being fired from a different vantage point.
​

In the video, Good can be heard saying, "That's fine, dude, I'm not mad at you," as the ICE agent walks around filming her vehicle in the road. A dog can be seen in the backseat.
​

 

[Cryptic]

The constant fixation on the victim's actions and not the OFFICER who killed someone is a very bizarre and abhorrent take. Jmo.

A deceased person's actions before a police shooting can never be questioned?

 

[Marysmith]

I'm basing my belief on the professionalism of officers. They don't run around shooting people because they're in a bad mood.

I respect you and most of your posts but seriously how was Ross professional in any way? He called her an "f...... b...." after shooting her! And she was not even being rude to him really, not that that would justify anything.

 

[Moonstrawbs]

I'm basing my belief on the professionalism of officers. They don't run around shooting people because they're in a bad mood.

You can say that for certainty for every single officer worldwide? What an incredulous statement to make. Don't say stick to the facts then add your own assumptions based on your beliefs..that is not what a fact is. Jmo.

 

[otto]

100%. He was triggered. And being that sensitive makes him unfit for duty. imo

But the head of the agency touts his professionalism.

jmo

What evidence is there that the officer was "triggered"? He shot the driver of a vehicle that was driving towards him from a short distance away.

 

[calmdownjudy]

He thought that would intimidate them. It didn't. So he got mad at the b*****es (his word).

jmo

Yep. They clocked him and it hurt his little ego.

His brain must be as small as his ego because what moron stands in front of a car that's not in park or off while in the middle of the road? You think he would've learned about the dangers of that the first time it happened.

 

[Mickey Mouse]

If we strip away all the politics, the opinions about the legitimacy of ICE, the emotions, the history, and just look at the facts ...

We have three officers. Two arrive and one orders the woman to get out of her vehicle. It doesn't matter why they did that, it must matters that it happened.

The woman did not get out of her vehicle. She chose to ignore the officers. It's well known that refusing to listen to an officer will escalate the situation.

While she was backing up her vehicle, one of the officers walked in front of her vehicle and towards the other two officers.

While that officer was walking in front of her vehicle, she reversed direction and started accelerating, spinning her front tires on the ice. He interpreted that decision as a threat. He reacted by pulling his weapon and aiming it at her. She didn't stop. He shot her.

Her vehicle continued in the direction she was steering and crashed into a parked vehicle with force.

Take away the noise, and what's left? Officers told a woman to do something, she refused, the situation escalated, the officer believed he was threatened, and we know how it ended.

Why are you consistently ignoring the multiple witnesses reporting that other officers telling her to leave?

 

[Marysmith]

Yep. They clocked him and it hurt his little ego.

His brain must be as small as his ego because what moron stands in front of a car that's not in park or off while in the middle of the road? You think he would've learned about the dangers of that the first time it happened.

The first time he broke a window and stuck his arm inside it.

 

[Ruminations]

But what is the purpose of removing all the context?

I haven’t done the frame by frame analysis of the cars moving (I really prefer not to watch people in my city be killed, on repeat) - so let’s say that your assessment is entirely accurate re the car.

“He interpreted that decision as a threat” is not a fact. It’s your conclusion and/or the statements of either the shooter or his org - who would have incentive to portray this interaction as a very scary attack on a federal LEO.

Removing the context doesn’t help us understand the situation better, it makes it HARDER to assess what’s happened.

My own opinion.

It is easy to see that she was murdered and the officer was not threatened.

There is nothing wrong with checking the video for the facts.

If this is still a country of law and order, a jury will see that video and in my opinion will have to convict.

But if you look at a video only to try to find some inane detail to attempt to blame the victim, well, that's blaming the victim, not analyzing the evidence.

MOO

 

[SouthAussie]

The county has created a website where people can submit evidence, such as video or information.

Minneapolis ICE shooting live updates: New video shows different vantage point

The 37-second cellphone video is one of several circulating of the incident.

www.yahoo.com

 

[Inthedetails]

What evidence is there that the officer was "triggered"? He shot the driver of a vehicle that was driving towards him from a short distance away.

He was triggered by women speaking to him boldly.

The telling piece was after he SHOT MORE THAN ONCE, including a SHOT TO A CIVILIAN'S HEAD, he called her a b****.

And after he murdered a civilian, he walked away. Then fled.

That is not professionalism. That is not self-control. That is not following training. That is triggered.

jmopinion

 

[Marysmith]

Why are you consistently ignoring the multiple witnesses reporting that other officers telling her to leave?

Exactly!! She went as quickly as she could in fact and as safely. IMO.

 

[Leilei]

You must be watching a completely different video from me.

Right? One that shows Renee inside the car shifting into drive prior to being shot to death.
If that video is out there, surely DHS would have released it immediately, as it would bolster their claim that she was trying to run the agent down with the SUV.
Noem would be insisting on breaking into all news stations to show it.
IMO.

 

[Snoopster]

If we strip away all the politics, the opinions about the legitimacy of ICE, the emotions, the history, and just look at the facts ...

We have three officers. Two arrive and one orders the woman to get out of her vehicle. It doesn't matter why they did that, it must matters that it happened.

The woman did not get out of her vehicle. She chose to ignore the officers. It's well known that refusing to listen to an officer will escalate the situation.

While she was backing up her vehicle, one of the officers walked in front of her vehicle and towards the other two officers.

While that officer was walking in front of her vehicle, she reversed direction and started accelerating, spinning her front tires on the ice. He interpreted that decision as a threat. He reacted by pulling his weapon and aiming it at her. She didn't stop. He shot her.

Her vehicle continued in the direction she was steering and crashed into a parked vehicle with force.

Take away the noise, and what's left? Officers told a woman to do something, she refused, the situation escalated, the officer believed he was threatened, and we know how it ended.

I beg to differ.

ICE officials ask her to move her vehicle. another gets out of his vehicle, grabbing her car door, demanding she get out, so she decides to comply with the order to move on. She did NOT deserved to be KILLED for this. It was a minor protest that didn't take much to convince her to move on. No other law enforcement agency would have handled this in this extreme way, IMO. Balance of risk was ignored. Balance of law was ignored. Three shots in the face was over the top. Telling others to decline aid was unforgivable (even though we know she was very likely beyond saving at the point.)

Law enforcement officials have a duty to be on balance for the benefit of society. There was none of that in his case. A non-aggressive woman was shot for protesting. JMO.

And I know you thought he was 'hit' by the vehicle, but I haven't seen that despite looking for it. It took him less than a second to be around the side of her slowly moving vehicle to shoot her in the face through the side window. If she was pressing on the gas hard he wouldn't have had time to do that. If he was "hit" by the vehicle it wouldn't have been more than a nudge after he stepped in front to prevent her from leaving. All JMO.

 

[Mickey Mouse]

I do believe that the only reason the officer pulled his weapon and aimed at the driver was to stop her, but she didn't stop.

I do not believe that the officer shot the driver because he has PTSD, anger against women, felt taunted, was emotional, or for any reason other than reasons associated with his job. That is, the only reason he would pull a weapon and shoot is because he felt threatened when a vehicle was heading towards him.

Shooting the driver does not stop the vehicle.

 

[Marysmith]

I beg to differ.

ICE officials ask her to move her vehicle. another gets out of his vehicle, grabbing her car door, demanding she get out, so she decides to comply with the order to move on. She did NOT deserved to be KILLED for this. It was a minor protest that didn't take much to convince her to move on. No other law enforcement agency would have handled this in this extreme way, IMO. Balance of risk was ignored. Balance of law was ignored. Three shots in the face was over the top. Telling others to decline aid was unforgivable (even though we know she was very likely beyond saving at the point.

Law enforcement officials have a duty to be on balance for the benefit of society. There was none of that in his case. A non-aggressive woman was shot for protesting. JMO.

And I know you thought he was 'hit' by the vehicle, but I haven't seen that despite looking for it. It took him less than a second to be around the side of her slowly moving vehicle to shoot her in the face through the side window. If she was pressing on the gas hard he wouldn't have had time to do that. If he was "hit" by the vehicle it wouldn't have been more than a nudge after he stepped in front to prevent her from leaving. All JMO.

I think most of us know why aid was refused... she was shot in the head after all.

 

[calmdownjudy]

The first time he broke a window and stuck his arm inside it.

And he was dragged by the car after he did it. This guy should just stay away from cars. Luckily, prisons don't have cars.

 

[Summerliz03]

Shooting the driver does not stop the vehicle.

And police officers are trained to know this and are taught to deploy other measures before that as an absolute final resort. Ross should have been taught that, especially since we now know that he’s been an agent for 10 years.

 

[rogue ant]

If we strip away all the politics, the opinions about the legitimacy of ICE

RSBM.

Oh that's rich.

 

[Mickey Mouse]

I'm basing my belief on the professionalism of officers. They don't run around shooting people because they're in a bad mood.

There have been multiple incidents of ICE shooting people in vehicles, making accusations that are later shown to be false, and charges against the victims being thrown out. (Links posted previously)

Do you think this shows ICE agents as competent professionals?