I beg to differ.
ICE officials ask her to move her vehicle. another gets out of his vehicle, grabbing her car door, demanding she get out, so she decides to comply with the order to move on. She did NOT deserved to be KILLED for this. It was a minor protest that didn't take much to convince her to move on. No other law enforcement agency would have handled this in this extreme way, IMO. Balance of risk was ignored. Balance of law was ignored. Three shots in the face was over the top. Telling others to decline aid was unforgivable (even though we know she was very likely beyond saving at the point.)
Law enforcement officials have a duty to be on balance for the benefit of society. There was none of that in his case. A non-aggressive woman was shot for protesting. JMO.
And I know you thought he was 'hit' by the vehicle, but I haven't seen that despite looking for it. It took him less than a second to be around the side of her slowly moving vehicle to shoot her in the face through the side window. If she was pressing on the gas hard he wouldn't have had time to do that. If he was "hit" by the vehicle it wouldn't have been more than a nudge after he stepped in front to prevent her from leaving. All JMO.