MO - Elizabeth Olten, 9, St Martin's, 21 Oct 2009 #7

[tgrlaw]

I didn't see AB as a friend either, but on the person mentioned's Twitter page there is a tweet that leads me to believe they were friends or at least she knew her. Just my opinion.

I knew i had seen that screen name, whatever its called, when we were still able to visit CR or AB's myspace pages. The intials referring to he shall not be named was somehow in the mix. Weird.

 

[LadyBug99]

*** NOTE: we are NOT to sleuth other members on here. The mods are VERY serious about this, and I'd suggest anyone who posted anything about ILC or anyone else should edit their posts or face TOs. (which aren't fun, trust me, I know!!)

Thank you I just deleted my earlier posts. However if someone has quoted my posts....Please delete that as well. Thanks again!

 

[bigflaw]

BigFlaw- Could you Delete the 17 year old's name in your ILoveCookies Post. If the's not the same person, we don't want to put any 17 yr old's real names out there.

If there is anything left, please let me know, I thought I removed the whole thing.

 

[Only]

Do I need to delete my post? Very unsure exactly what violates the TOS here. Definetly don't want a Time Out!

 

[Flashforward]

I'm pretty sure that 9-12 is all in the same yearbook, but don't hold me to it.

I asked my daughter the other day about her yearbook and she said she didn't get one last year (10th grade then). She should have a 9th grade one, but AB wouldn't have been in that one since she was still in middle school then.[/QUOTI

Yeah I think my senior yearbook has 9th graders but it has been awhile since I graduated.

 

[MDATCA]

:waitasec:

Uh, about 2 months.

Yah, ILC was too good to be true apparently, but now my brain hurts also, because i can't recall without rereading, what he brought to the soup. The diary timeline and questioning at 10 on friday made no sense, wether AB was high or not. They must have not had the diary and or other written evidence until later, like friday am.

.That is what I was arguing and I don't think people understood. After looking back at LE statements and what not I don't think that they had pinpointed AB until they were given the written source. That is why I made the statements about there being one PO in the city and it is Barney Fife. They were made tongue in cheek because the whole idea of them knowing Thursday and not doing anything about it until Friday was so absurd I couldn't believe anyone could believe that. No LE agency operates like that. If they wanted to question her and found her under the influence she would have been taken in on that alone. But only after being taken to a medical facility to verify what and how much was used. Then if it was found she was under the influence of something she would have been detained in the medical facility until she sobered up or if she was clean they would have continued with their questioning.

 

[Flashforward]

Hey I printed off AB's FB page while it was still viewable and now the first person on her friends account has been taken off as well.

 

[tgrlaw]

.That is what I was arguing and I don't think people understood. After looking back at LE statements and what not I don't think that they had pinpointed AB until they were given the written source. That is why I made the statements about there being one PO in the city and it is Barney Fife. They were made tongue in cheek because the whole idea of them knowing Thursday and not doing anything about it until Friday was so absurd I couldn't believe anyone could believe that. No LE agency operates like that. If they wanted to question her and found her under the influence she would have been taken in on that alone. But only after being taken to a medical facility to verify what and how much was used. Then if it was found she was under the influence of something she would have been detained in the medical facility until she sobered up or if she was clean they would have continued with their questioning.

Exactly, the way LE and the news reported it LE was given some written material after the 10 am presser. Acting on that and other physical evidence led them to the suspect, who after some questioning led them to the body sometime shortly before 3 pm.

 

[Deleted member 718]

I knew i had seen that screen name, whatever its called, when we were still able to visit CR or AB's myspace pages. The intials referring to he shall not be named was somehow in the mix. Weird.

I'm lost. Who is CR? Just a hint please.

 

[lawlady84]

Not even if they have been banned for being a fraud?

Eeek! Sorry, I missed that. I have no idea. I just know there's a general rule never to try to sleuth any posters or try to figure out who's "behind" the username. And if people can get TOs for personal info on people named in the news, I'd think it would be 10x easier to get a TO for personal info on a poster.


And I KNEW something was off with ILC when he/she insisted ABs family was "forbidden" to leave their home by LE.

 

[vjlaw]

.That is what I was arguing and I don't think people understood. After looking back at LE statements and what not I don't think that they had pinpointed AB until they were given the written source. That is why I made the statements about there being one PO in the city and it is Barney Fife. They were made tongue in cheek because the whole idea of them knowing Thursday and not doing anything about it until Friday was so absurd I couldn't believe anyone could believe that. No LE agency operates like that. If they wanted to question her and found her under the influence she would have been taken in on that alone. But only after being taken to a medical facility to verify what and how much was used. Then if it was found she was under the influence of something she would have been detained in the medical facility until she sobered up or if she was clean they would have continued with their questioning.

Well, maybe she did spend the night in the Prenger Center.

 

[lorann]

Are we now permitted to voice our previously-unvoiced theories about ILC? Thanks for your guidance.

As long as you don't accuse innocent people of being involved. They have a suspect in custody so please don't post a theory that throws guilt onto someone else.

Thank you and I agree. I think you might be right. Thank you.

Tell you what. Let's discuss this jerk for today. Figure stuff out and then blott him out of our memory. I really have to run because I am later than my normal lateness. Yikes.

BBM
I think Tricia is saying we can unload everything today - then get over it. I don't think you have to delete your postings.

ETA the postings about ILC -

 

[crimecurious]

I don't know... but I'm glad that it was deleted... it was against TOS

Ohhhh that's what happened. I better delete it myself. Just thought it sounded mean...

Will you delete my quote please?

 

[tgrlaw]

I'm lost. Who is CR? Just a hint please.

search back a few threads, may be 3,4,5?

 

[Jules71]

Exactly, the way LE and the news reported it LE was given some written material after the 10 am presser. Acting on that and other physical evidence led them to the suspect, who after some questioning led them to the body sometime shortly before 3 pm.

If it was true that AB was being formally questioned at this same time - it is possible the "physical evidence" they are referring to is AB with defensive wounds - and the written evidence is the diary, although I still think there was an actual letter written (by who - maybe a family member).

 

[tgrlaw]

Is tricia's rumor rule for locals still in effect?

 

[Jules71]

Is tricia's rumor rule for locals still in effect?

She hasn't said it isn't.

 

[~Always Have Hope~]

Is tricia's rumor rule for locals still in effect?

I would think so.

 

[nursebeeme]

Ohhhh that's what happened. I better delete it myself. Just thought it sounded mean...

Will you delete my quote please?

done ;-)

 

[bigflaw]

If it was true that AB was being formally questioned at this same time - it is possible the "physical evidence" they are referring to is AB with defensive wounds - and the written evidence is the diary, although I still think there was an actual letter written (by who - maybe a family member).

My initial thought was thought about the physical evidence was maybe a muddy pair of shoes, or dirt tracked to/into the house. But the defensive wounds thing is a great point.