MO - Grief & protests follow shooting of teen Michael Brown #15

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,041
It is not the law that needs interpreting. We know it means OW would have to have a probable fear for his life or someone else's.

What needs interpreting is whether or not OW had probable reason to believe that. It is your opinion he did, that is fine, I respect that. It is not however, a fact.

The statute reads: (2) When he reasonably believes that such use of deadly force is immediately necessary. This is the MO Statute. So all the officer has to feel is that his life or the life of another is in imminent danger. The officer is the one who makes that determination in what may be a matter of seconds.

Please make sure you have the right Statutes due to different states as they may be different. If you want to argue the law make sure you have the right one.

Thanks, Lambchop
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
62
Guests online
2,698
Total visitors
2,760

Forum statistics

Threads
632,247
Messages
18,623,832
Members
243,065
Latest member
kim71
Back
Top