Unfortunately, you didn't
1. OW eye socket was blown out. Who blew it out?____ Has the family's attorney denied that MB hit OW in the face?
YES or NO?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...tercation.html The source of the "orbital blowout" came originally from the Gateway Pundit.
http://therightscoop.com/cnn-report...-socket-after-altercation-with-michael-brown/
I'm not buying that- other news sources refute that. I accept that you are free to believe that account.
You didn't answer this: Has the family's attorney denied that MB hit OW in the face?
YES or NO?
8. I'm going to tell you that if it WASN'T assault, MB's family attorney would be all over the news stating that it wasn't true. Instead, the opposite is happening. He's saying, "in the upcoming days, you're going to hear things about MB.. but ..." Each time the man speaks, he keeps adding a few more facts about the story that continue to give thinking people more understanding as to why OW was justified in his actions. When this started out, we didn't hear anything about an altercation from him- only from an eyewitness and from the person speaking for OW. Then he finally admitted it... totally dishonest. YES he would have continued. There's no reason to believe he would not have. He assaulted the store owner. He assaulted OW. He would have continued.
9. I asked if someone hits
YOU. I didn't ask about MB. I asked a personal question. Can you answer?
But, you've also created a strawman-
I never said MB went directly for OW's gun. Maybe he hit him first and then went for the gun. I have no idea what happened first. But, there was a struggle for the gun. There would not be a struggle if MB didn't go for it. OW wouldn't struggle with himself.
Also, since you bring it.. is it acceptable to deflect even if you are being "drawn down on"?
Can you legally touch an officer's gun if you feel you are being threatened by that officer?
And, just for the record, an officer would NEVER draw down on someone and be the first person to "ACT" through a window. That would never, ever, ever happen, just as a point of clarification (invalidating your argument).
10. Your scenario in #497 doesn't ring true. I've explained this scenario previously. If MB was shot from behind and turned around, his affected arm would now be on the opposite side of his body,
requiring OW to realign his aim to at least 18-20 inches over and begin shooting again, in the same pattern. All within 2-4 seconds. Just not possible. The shot pattern doesn't substantiate this.
I can't find that link from MB's family attorney right this second- but I got interrupted in my search. It is on #9 thread and on Fox News- if someone who has it handy can post that, I'd be grateful!
Here is a statement from the Chief of Police stating that there was a struggle between MB and OW in the car and that the gun went off in the car. Daryl Parks hasn't refuted it (which, again, he would.. instead, he's confirmed it at that elusive link..)
http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/crim...olice-news-conference-michael-brown/13860601/
Here's the link,
Bernina:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1408/20/ng.01.html
The attorney calls it an "altercation". He could call it, "playtime with Barney" and it wouldn't make it so. If a gunshot goes off during said altercation, I'm pretty sure that's classified as assault, regardless of what he calls it.