Resolved MO - Kansas City, Bones on bank of Missouri River, Sep'13 - Not human

sophiafox

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
29
Reaction score
124
  • #1
  • #2
Hmmm. that is interesting.. So like they washed up???
 
  • #3
  • #4
Thinking about Baby Lisa Irwin.
 
  • #5
  • #6
  • #7
Well, a human skull is pretty distinctive! Surely there aren't any wild monkeys roaming the banks of this river.
 
  • #8
Well, a human skull is pretty distinctive! Surely there aren't any wild monkeys roaming the banks of this river.

Yes, and a dog skull is pretty distinctive too, no matter the breed. I think we can say that the bones are not adult-sized human bones based on the size. The reporter in the video said that a source told him the hand was more like a foot. He didn't say paw so...I guess we'll find out soon if they are non-human bones.
 
  • #9
I hope that, if nothing else, every time a little bone is found in Missouri, a certain guilty woman feels terrible for what she did.

I get my hopes up every time. Lisa deserves justice.
 
  • #10
More bones could "wash up" or come about. Lisa does deserve some justice.
 
  • #11
  • #12
  • #13
That still leaves at least one, possibly two, sets of remains that have not yet been classified. I have been watching for them to be entered on NAMUS, and that hasn't happened yet, so I don't know whether to assume that means they have already been identified and don't need to be entered, or they are just moving very very slowly. I wonder, hypothetically of course, how a suspect being the next of kin would affect the process of notification? Or would it?
 
  • #14
I wonder how long they date back.
 
  • #15

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
1,381
Total visitors
1,467

Forum statistics

Threads
632,476
Messages
18,627,341
Members
243,166
Latest member
DFWKaye
Back
Top