MO - Lisa Irwin, 10 months, Kansas City, 4 Oct 2011 - #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #361
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15642798/authorities-search-joco-landfill-for-missing-baby-lisa


"Irwin said he came home from his overnight shift around 4 a.m. Tuesday. He noticed a first-floor window open in the front of the house. After checking on his sons, 6 and 8, he went to the bedroom of his daughter, Lisa, and noticed her missing. Deborah Bradley said she ran through the house screaming for her daughter but there was no answer"

OK, something is wrong here. I watched the video on The Today Show, and their computerized image, IIRC, showed the baby's room more easily accessible from the front door. But according to this article, the dad bypassed the baby's room and checked on his two sons first (one was in his own room and the other sleeping with mom). Only after that he went to the room that was most easily accessible when he walked in the front door? Hmmm. He would have had to walk by the baby's room TWICE if he checked on one son, then the other.

Maybe her nursery door was closed and the other doors were open, so he popped his head in those doors first and then went to Lisa's room?
 
  • #362
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15642798/authorities-search-joco-landfill-for-missing-baby-lisa


"Irwin said he came home from his overnight shift around 4 a.m. Tuesday. He noticed a first-floor window open in the front of the house. After checking on his sons, 6 and 8, he went to the bedroom of his daughter, Lisa, and noticed her missing. Deborah Bradley said she ran through the house screaming for her daughter but there was no answer"

OK, something is wrong here. I watched the video on The Today Show, and their computerized image, IIRC, showed the baby's room more easily accessible from the front door. But according to this article, the dad bypassed the baby's room and checked on his two sons first (one was in his own room and the other sleeping with mom). Only after that he went to the room that was most easily accessible when he walked in the front door? Hmmm. He would have had to walk by the baby's room TWICE if he checked on one son, then the other.

see i don't know if that is odd to me.. When I check on my boys I always go to either my middle son's room or the baby room because they are across the hall from another to the right at the top of my stairs, then I check on my oldest, his room is next to ours at the left. even when I get out of bed in the middle of the night to check on them I always go down the hall to the younger boys and then to my oldest.
 
  • #363
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15642798/authorities-search-joco-landfill-for-missing-baby-lisa


"Irwin said he came home from his overnight shift around 4 a.m. Tuesday. He noticed a first-floor window open in the front of the house. After checking on his sons, 6 and 8, he went to the bedroom of his daughter, Lisa, and noticed her missing. Deborah Bradley said she ran through the house screaming for her daughter but there was no answer"

OK, something is wrong here. I watched the video on The Today Show, and their computerized image, IIRC, showed the baby's room more easily accessible from the front door. But according to this article, the dad bypassed the baby's room and checked on his two sons first (one was in his own room and the other sleeping with mom). Only after that he went to the room that was most easily accessible when he walked in the front door? Hmmm. He would have had to walk by the baby's room TWICE if he checked on one son, then the other.

Maybe not totally strange- my DH said he would have went for the rooms of the kids that could walk and were mobile more so than a baby. If dad figured Lisa was confined to a crib he might have went to look in on the boys first.
 
  • #364
So we are thinking they have a reason to believe the phones would be in the house or near it, right?
 
  • #365
  • #366
I have to leave for a while ... and I hope that when I check back here later this evening, that Baby Lisa has been found !


:praying: for Baby Lisa
 
  • #367
...do we know how long they had lived in that house ?

..thanks! if anyone knows.

Back in the first thread, it was said that the father had lived there since approx 2002, and the mother just moved there within the past year or two.
 
  • #368
I've chased this thread all day.....I feel like I've been beat with a whip....

Me too. I'm tired as if I had done hard labor for 8 hours. At some point this evening I am going to have to take a shower and I am going to ask that everyone stop posting for 15 minutes. Thanks in advance.
 
  • #369
  • #370
  • #371
Thank You, Mel !

This is interesting ... and something to check into that can come in handy for an emergency.

:seeya:

Well that's what my phone company says! I haven't actually called 911 to test it out (hey, does this work) LOL. I'd check with your local carrier if you know it.

I'd be really bummed if I needed it and found out that it doesn't work. GAWD. Better have that cell phone just in case!
 
  • #372
This search for the (presumed) cellphones could still implicate a random person. They kidnap baby, swipe phones from counter top so nobody can call authorities, and then throw them in the backyard shrubs when leaving?

Sounded better before I started typing it. Sounds ridiculous now though.
 
  • #373
  • #374
Not to seem rude, but this is the 100th time I've heard people talk about the shorts. My kids wear shorts to bed and always have. Could we PLEASE drop it about this baby's clothing!?!?!?!?

Thank you! again! and here is some info to support my earlier post about the dangers of the flame retardant chemicals on children's pajamas....

////snipped////

"Generally, the chemicals used on pajamas or pajama fabrics include chlorinated and brominated flame retardants, inorganic flame retardants such as antimony oxides, and phosphate-based compounds.
Unfortunately, chlorinated and brominated flame retardants are contaminating the environment and accumulating in the human body. For example, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) have been linked to damage to the nervous and reproductive systems and impairing thyroid function. And you generally can’t tell what flame retardant is being used on any particular clothing item. And you can’t really wash the flame retardants out."

http://www.pediatricsafety.net/2009/10/childrens-pajamas-and-flame-retardants/
 
  • #375
Walking into a house where there were lights on and wondering what was up, I would go to the adults room first. The adult is who should be aware and able to tell what was up. If they didn't know, then I would check kids in the order I came to them.

But I also agree about checking on mobile kids first too.
 
  • #376
http://www.kctv5.com/story/15642798/authorities-search-joco-landfill-for-missing-baby-lisa


"Irwin said he came home from his overnight shift around 4 a.m. Tuesday. He noticed a first-floor window open in the front of the house. After checking on his sons, 6 and 8, he went to the bedroom of his daughter, Lisa, and noticed her missing. Deborah Bradley said she ran through the house screaming for her daughter but there was no answer"

OK, something is wrong here. I watched the video on The Today Show, and their computerized image, IIRC, showed the baby's room more easily accessible from the front door. But according to this article, the dad bypassed the baby's room and checked on his two sons first (one was in his own room and the other sleeping with mom). Only after that he went to the room that was most easily accessible when he walked in the front door? Hmmm. He would have had to walk by the baby's room TWICE if he checked on one son, then the other.

Good catch. Especially, if his daughter was sick, and he knew it, it would have seemed he would go there first.

This is not looking good.
 
  • #377
it looks like they are getting ready to go live on fox

they asked all other cameras not associated with fox network to leave
 
  • #378
Me too. I'm tired as if I had done hard labor for 8 hours. At some point this evening I am going to have to take a shower and I am going to ask that everyone stop posting for 15 minutes. Thanks in advance.


BBM: :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh: Hilarious !
 
  • #379
well, now it just went to a screen saver...
 
  • #380
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
3,422
Total visitors
3,564

Forum statistics

Threads
632,669
Messages
18,630,114
Members
243,244
Latest member
Evan meow meow
Back
Top