There are so many myths in the above posts, as shown when they were covered in previous threads.
I will not get into rehashing things that have already been covered, because it would be off topic, take forever, and I want this thread to stay open, friendly, and focused. Our three months of sleuthing threads are still here to read.
I will only say this, regarding the supposed bungled investigation: the grand jury was not given false evidence or told to "trust us - it would exonerate Wilson if we had it." So even if those "botches" occurred, and exhonorating evidence didn't get to the jury, that only hurt Wilson, which would make their finding even more compellingly just.
As does the fact that the jury and DA went against their senses of self preservation; their lives would have been much easier had they given the mob what it wanted.
As always, I recommend reading straight from the documents instead of trusting reporters to tell one what happened in the hearings or investigation. Reading the docs, paying attention to the forensics, it's clear that they chose to do the right thing instead of the safest thing for themselves.
Now... I'm going to scroll and roll, so we don't get shut down again. :fish:
Sent from Tapatalk
