MO MO - Ricky McCormick, 41, St Louis, 30 June 1999

  • #901
First time trying out this kind of investigation, i made some notes based on context clues. This is probably the most facinating case i have ever seen

(mnDnvwEAesE-w[or n]-s-TA-v-w[or n]-v w[or n] A R E) (ACSm)
TFR N[or w] E N i t N[or w] S E N[or w] P &[or R] S E R c B R n[or w] S E p[u, or v] P R S E I N[or w] C
PRSE N m RSE BPREHLD wLDN[w] CBE(TFXLC[E] TCXLw cBE)
AL-PRPPIT XYPPIYwcBEmGKSEWcDRcBRwSGPRSEWLDRCBRwSEwT56NE10TXSE-CRSLE-CLTRSEWLDwCBE
ALWcPwCBETSmELRSERLSEvRGLSw-EASNW-DNcBE
(NoPFSENLSRENCBE) NTEGDDmNSENCURERCBRwE
(TEwE TFRNE NCBRTSENCBE ING)
(FLRSE PQSEONDE71 NCBE)
(CDwSEPQsEDNS0E 74 NCBE)
(PRtSEPRSEONREDE 75 NCBE)
(TF NGcmSPsoLEmRDELUSE TOTE WLD NCBE)
(194 WLD's NCBE) (TRFXL)

ALPNTE GLSE-SE ERTE VLSE m7's E-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE
PURTRSEONPRSEWLD NCBE
NWLDXLRcmsP NE WLD STS me XL
DULmT 6 TuNSE NCBEXC

(muNSA 1 STENmu NARSE)
KLSE-LKSTE-TR SE-TRSE-mKSEp-mRSE
(SAE 6 NSE SE NmRSE)
pmN RCBRNSE PTE 2pTEwsREBKe 3 E
26 mLSE 74 SPRKSE 29KENOSOLE 173R 7 RSE
35 GLE CLGSE ouwuTXEBKRSE PSESHLE
651 mTCSEHTLSEN CUTCTRS NmRE 99.84.5 2uNEPLSEUCRSEAOLTSEwSKSENBSE
NSREONSE PUTSEWLDNCBE (3XaRL)
BNmSE NTSE INR NTRLERCBRNSE NTSRCRbNELSPNSENG-SPSE mLSERBESGweBEAVXL'R
HmCRENmREpCBE 1/2 muwPPLSE
D-w-m/4 HPL XDRLX

notes:
NCBE seems to be used as an object or something simmilar that can be counted

"WRLD's" is probably also a object that can be counted and probably bought

strangely "m7's " is also plural based on what i can tell from the actual writing. Its quite hard to tell though as the writing is quite messy

I could be wrong and probably are but hopefully one day someone cracks this
 
  • #902
First time trying out this kind of investigation, i made some notes based on context clues. This is probably the most facinating case i have ever seen

(mnDnvwEAesE-w[or n]-s-TA-v-w[or n]-v w[or n] A R E) (ACSm)
TFR N[or w] E N i t N[or w] S E N[or w] P &[or R] S E R c B R n[or w] S E p[u, or v] P R S E I N[or w] C
PRSE N m RSE BPREHLD wLDN[w] CBE(TFXLC[E] TCXLw cBE)
AL-PRPPIT XYPPIYwcBEmGKSEWcDRcBRwSGPRSEWLDRCBRwSEwT56NE10TXSE-CRSLE-CLTRSEWLDwCBE
ALWcPwCBETSmELRSERLSEvRGLSw-EASNW-DNcBE
(NoPFSENLSRENCBE) NTEGDDmNSENCURERCBRwE
(TEwE TFRNE NCBRTSENCBE ING)
(FLRSE PQSEONDE71 NCBE)
(CDwSEPQsEDNS0E 74 NCBE)
(PRtSEPRSEONREDE 75 NCBE)
(TF NGcmSPsoLEmRDELUSE TOTE WLD NCBE)
(194 WLD's NCBE) (TRFXL)

ALPNTE GLSE-SE ERTE VLSE m7's E-CTSE-WSE-FRTSE
PURTRSEONPRSEWLD NCBE
NWLDXLRcmsP NE WLD STS me XL
DULmT 6 TuNSE NCBEXC

(muNSA 1 STENmu NARSE)
KLSE-LKSTE-TR SE-TRSE-mKSEp-mRSE
(SAE 6 NSE SE NmRSE)
pmN RCBRNSE PTE 2pTEwsREBKe 3 E
26 mLSE 74 SPRKSE 29KENOSOLE 173R 7 RSE
35 GLE CLGSE ouwuTXEBKRSE PSESHLE
651 mTCSEHTLSEN CUTCTRS NmRE 99.84.5 2uNEPLSEUCRSEAOLTSEwSKSENBSE
NSREONSE PUTSEWLDNCBE (3XaRL)
BNmSE NTSE INR NTRLERCBRNSE NTSRCRbNELSPNSENG-SPSE mLSERBESGweBEAVXL'R
HmCRENmREpCBE 1/2 muwPPLSE
D-w-m/4 HPL XDRLX

notes:
NCBE seems to be used as an object or something simmilar that can be counted

"WRLD's" is probably also a object that can be counted and probably bought

strangely "m7's " is also plural based on what i can tell from the actual writing. Its quite hard to tell though as the writing is quite messy

I could be wrong and probably are but hopefully one day someone cracks this
I think “WLD” is the key here. It is used repeatedly as WLD with NCBE almost always after it. It only once appears as a possessive with “194 WLD’S NCBE” at the end of the notes
 
  • #903
I'm studying speech pathology and not much of a investigator, sleuth, whatever you want to call it... but I figured I should put my thoughts down just in case someone else can make anything of it, even if I can't. I'm sorry if this ends up being a whole lot of nothing or a whole lot of repeated information.

I suspect if the note is written by Ricky, it is written in a form of AAVE native to St. Louis. The biggest pointer is the comment cited in news articles by his mother: "The only thing he could write was his name. He didn't write in no code." It is also possible that he was dyslexic, which could complicate things a lot further.

I find the use of dashes and brackets extremely interesting. They seem to be the only grammatical clues available outside of the potential of E being used as a word/sentence break.

The incidence of "SPRKS" on the Notes page might be a red herring, but I noticed Ricky's mother's maiden name is Sparks.

I'll also add to a few previous comments here in that WLD and NCBE are extremely interesting, but the occurrence of X - and generally XL together - has my interest especially piqued, given X's relatively uncommon nature generally. It might be an important contextual clue.

Good luck with this one y'all, I really hope some sort of resolution is reached eventually, even if it's something as simple as directions or a shopping list.
 
  • #904
I'm studying speech pathology and not much of a investigator, sleuth, whatever you want to call it... but I figured I should put my thoughts down just in case someone else can make anything of it, even if I can't. I'm sorry if this ends up being a whole lot of nothing or a whole lot of repeated information.

I suspect if the note is written by Ricky, it is written in a form of AAVE native to St. Louis. The biggest pointer is the comment cited in news articles by his mother: "The only thing he could write was his name. He didn't write in no code." It is also possible that he was dyslexic, which could complicate things a lot further.

I find the use of dashes and brackets extremely interesting. They seem to be the only grammatical clues available outside of the potential of E being used as a word/sentence break.

The incidence of "SPRKS" on the Notes page might be a red herring, but I noticed Ricky's mother's maiden name is Sparks.

I'll also add to a few previous comments here in that WLD and NCBE are extremely interesting, but the occurrence of X - and generally XL together - has my interest especially piqued, given X's relatively uncommon nature generally. It might be an important contextual clue.

Good luck with this one y'all, I really hope some sort of resolution is reached eventually, even if it's something as simple as directions or a shopping list.
Welcome to Ws @LuteAndLyre, thank you for the very interesting interpretation of the note!
 
  • #905
It's directions from Delmont, Ohio to Ft Lauderdale - check out my video explaining the route:
 
  • #906
By Christina Coulter September 27, 2025
''According to ABC News, analysts tried every tool they had and even consulted outside experts, but no one could solve the system.
“We are really good at what we do,” Dan Olson, chief of the unit, told ABC News. “But we could use a little help on this one. Breaking the code could reveal the victim’s whereabouts before his death and could lead to the solution of a homicide. Not every cipher we get arrives at our door under those circumstances.”
In March 2011, the FBI released the notes to the public, calling them one of its top unsolved codes — by then, McCormick had been dead for more than a decade.''

“Now, twelve years later, they come back with this chicken-scratch s---,” she said. “The only thing he could write was his name. He didn’t write in no code.” His cousin Charles agreed: “He couldn’t spell anything, just scribble.”
But according to CBS News, investigators believed McCormick had been using coded notes since he was a child, though family members said they never knew how to read them.''

''Today, the FBI still lists McCormick’s cipher as one of its top unsolved cases.'
 
  • #907
Hey, I don't know how many people are on this case still, but I have a good idea of what this might be.

At this point, one thing I noticed is everyone assuming that it was in English, which is what he spoke, when also alluding to the fact that he had involvement with drugs and other gang like activity.

Doing some digging on bob Hamdallah, the guy suspected of killing him, led me to juma Hamdallah, his mother, a PALISTINIAN immigrant, which there speaks Arabic. There are ways to write Arabic using the English alphabet, so it might be likely they disguised Arabic in the English language, with some possible other cyphers.

For further info, the place juma was from was - "Al-Bireh, al-Birah, or el-Bira (Arabic: البيرة; also known historically as Castrum Mahomeria, Magna Mahomeria, Mahomeria Major, Birra, or Beirothah"

using this method, "PRSE" transcribed to "حقسث" which translated to "I will"
 
Last edited:
  • #908
Doing some further digging, it is unlikely the notes are Arabic, but knowing that the assialent may have spoken Arabic does help. Arabic often encodes meaning through classification, condition, and state, not through linear sentence flow. This could provide structure to bus routes, written by the assailant.

Then why leave a note? They haven't done this before, or 2 and 2 would be put together.
Ricky was on edge. He was in the drug trade. He tried to stay in the hospital as an excuse to get help for his life. He knew he was going to die, so he distanced himself. The assailant used a close weapon to cut his neck, so he tried to preserve evidence by grabbing a random piece of paper and hiding it in his pockets.

It explains the language flow better, and a personal notation of shorthand, NOT meant to be a cipher, which is why it has not been decoded.
There are almost no explicit action words, almost no tense markers, and almost no subject–verb–object structure. Meaning is carried by nouns and modifiers, not actions.

Long chains like:

WLDNCBE
NCVTCTRS
NTSRCRSNE


These behave like packed noun phrases, not words meant to be spoken.

Parentheses are used not as asides, but as state qualifiers.


Example:

(TENE TFRNE NCBRTSENCBE INC)


This behaves like:

“When [state TENE + TFRNE] applies, [NCBRTSENCBE] increases”. That’s conditional logic, not commentary.




Lists like:

36MLSE 74SPRKSE 29KENOSOLE 173RTRSE


No “and,” no explanation, no hierarchy marker — just equivalence under evaluation, and standalone numbers like:

35
651
1/2


These appear as decision points, not quantities to be described. These are things not meant to be deciphered, but shorthand of an Arabic structured string of English names and words







Example:
WLDRCBRNSE NT SGNENTXSE-CRSLE-CLTRSE WLDNCBE


What’s happening structurally:

Core noun: WLDNCBE

Preceded by multiple qualifiers:

WLDRCBRNSE

SGNENTXSE

CRSLE

CLTRSE

This is a noun-last construction:

[modifier][modifier][modifier] → CORE STATE

In English shorthand, people usually write:

CORE → details

In Arabic-influenced structure, it’s very common to:

stack descriptors → resolve at the end

This mirrors Arabic iḍāfa-like chaining (possessive/qualifying chains), even though the language is not Arabic.


Example2:
ALWLD NCBE TSME LRSE RLSE VRGLSNE AS N WLD NCBE


Notice:

Repetition of the same core token (WLD NCBE), surrounded by contextual modifiers, with no verb indicating change or action

This reads structurally as:

“In state A, under conditions X Y Z, [same core state] applies”

Arabic technical notes often:

Restate the core condition rather than referring back with pronouns or verbs

English writers usually avoid repetition; Arabic structure tolerates and even prefers it for clarity.



Why is this important?

English-native operational notes typically show at least one of:

verbs (“go,” “wait,” “check”)

arrows (→)

time markers (“am,” “pm”)

explicit cause/effect words

crossed-out revisions

explanatory redundancy

Your text has none of these.

Instead, it relies on:

implicit relationships

shared understanding

state-based logic

That is much more common in Arabic (and some Semitic) note traditions, especially among bilingual speakers writing for themselves.




This distinction explains why decades of effort failed:

The FBI searched for words, substitutions, and messages

But the text is closer to:

a rulebook with no legend
a flowchart without labels
a checklist without verbs



Saying “Arabic structure” does not mean the killer was Arab, the notes are Arabic, or the solution is Arabic (Although it doesn't not rule it out). It means the thinking pattern behind the notation aligns more closely with Arabic-style conditional, nominal, state-driven organization than with English linear sentence construction, furthering my idea that this is NOT a cypher, but a handwritten note that does not have any intention to be deciphered
 
  • #909
I think the WLD NCBE is the key to this note.

Those words are always together, and one on occasion the WLD takes a possessive property with WLD’S NCBE
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
218
Guests online
1,849
Total visitors
2,067

Forum statistics

Threads
636,978
Messages
18,707,690
Members
244,000
Latest member
norfolkinchance
Back
Top