MO - Sherrill Levitt, 47, Suzie Streeter, 19, & Stacy McCall, 18, Springfield, 7 June 1992 #13

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #441
There is not one mention of Sherrill in the police report at all. Also why worry about second hand info and not worry about first hand info?
The worry would be in who would snitch. First hand, Second hand, Third hand. Wouldn't matter if they were the one's who someone was concerned with snitching.
 
  • #442
I still think Janelle is the key here she is a lot more involved than what has been portrayed.

Everything is down to Janelle’s timeline including when they was last seen at the party and Janelle also the first on the scene.

Her story has multiple holes in it and it’s highly likely she told Suzie she couldn’t spend the night as her house was too busy. So Stacey taking pity on her went along with her for the evening back to her home and the rest is history. She would of also of been absolutely petrified of going to the police knowing the outcome of the 3 women.

IMO MOO
I agree with you 100%. I think she knows way way way more than she will ever tell. And as you said, her story is full of holes.......full of them.
 
  • #443
The worry would be in who would snitch. First hand, Second hand, Third hand. Wouldn't matter if they were the one's who someone was concerned with snitching.

With that logic I would think Joe would be the biggest target since he was the reason they were caught since he talked at a party. Also Dusty and Joe were at the police station far more. Suzie was there one time.

*edit to clarify. Suzie was there once for the statement, but was also there the day before to pick up Dusty. That is when Dusty told Suzie about the vandalism.
 
  • #444
Suzie I think had to be the target and then Sherrill as collateral damage because Suzie could of confided in her.

Stacey just a victim of circumstances that got her killed.

I don’t know what Suzie knew but she certainly had bad taste in men and hang around with questionable people and she had to be silenced. It also had to be that night for some strange reason or they wouldn’t of taken the risk of taking Stacey.

MOO
 
  • #445
No, I do not.

I believe that it would likely take a police officer, a “fake” police officer or a person trained or educated in police procedure. There is such a person I have in mind.

The crime scene was, IMO, “staged” to confuse the investigators. This is also why I do not believe the “Grand Jury Three” were involved. It also tends to rule out Cox, although we do not know how badly the crime scene was contaminated by the dozen or so visitors to the house before the police arrived.

Absent such skills, it would seemingly require a a contractor who knew how to do this. If that occurred, it comes down to the motive. Who among all the possible suspects had the necessary motive sufficient to murder three women?

With all due respect, sometimes I feel like you ask “us” questions, that I feel like you already know the answer too. Please correct me if I’m wrong. However, if you are doing so, why are you doing this?
 
  • #446
With that logic I would think Joe would be the biggest target since he was the reason they were caught since he talked at a party. Also Dusty and Joe were at the police station far more. Suzie was there one time.

*edit to clarify. Suzie was there once for the statement, but was also there the day before to pick up Dusty. That is when Dusty told Suzie about the vandalism.
I would tend to agree with you on that one. But I guess it would really boil down to who they were more worried about, and who they could get to easier. Didn't Joe skip town? May be he just wasn't as easy of a target. But at the end of the day, I'm just speculating and don't know one way or the other what the right answer is. Someone wanted them gone. Question is, who, and why.
 
  • #447
No, I do not.

I believe that it would likely take a police officer, a “fake” police officer or a person trained or educated in police procedure. There is such a person I have in mind.

The crime scene was, IMO, “staged” to confuse the investigators. This is also why I do not believe the “Grand Jury Three” were involved. It also tends to rule out Cox, although we do not know how badly the crime scene was contaminated by the dozen or so visitors to the house before the police arrived.

Absent such skills, it would seemingly require a a contractor who knew how to do this. If that occurred, it comes down to the motive. Who among all the possible suspects had the necessary motive sufficient to murder three women?


Do you believe Janelle staged the crime scene or even her boyfriend?


Let’s not forget the opportunity of getting them in and out of the house because it was light they wouldn’t of had much time to stage.

But somebody like Janelle has hours upon hours unaccounted for and could of easily of altered the crime scene.

IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #448
It's "You're" NOT "Your". You have some serious anger management issues dude. And, your caps lock is still on. And you're a bold face liar. Period!
you see every damn officer who see your calling me a liar and knows what i said is true , means you may wake hillbilly justice on your 🤬🤬🤬
 
  • #449
I would tend to agree with you on that one. But I guess it would really boil down to who they were more worried about, and who they could get to easier. Didn't Joe skip town? May be he just wasn't as easy of a target. But at the end of the day, I'm just speculating and don't know one way or the other what the right answer is. Someone wanted them gone. Question is, who, and why.

What Suzie wrote in the statement was the same as Dusty. Dusty talked first, right away after he found out Joe had been talking about it at a party. Really don’t think this was about keeping anyone quiet or Joe and Dusty would of been gone. Why take out a second or third hand knowledge person when you can take out first hand knowledge people. Dusty never left.
 
  • #450
What Suzie wrote in the statement was the same as Dusty. Dusty talked first, right away after he found out Joe had been talking about it at a party. Really don’t think this was about keeping anyone quiet or Joe and Dusty would of been gone. Why take out a second or third hand knowledge person when you can take out first hand knowledge people. Dusty never left.
Well, do you think it was something that may have happened at one of the parties the girls attended? A fight between the girls, or with a group of girls or others, that bleed over to Suzies house somehow. Might explain JK's strange behavior, and ever changing stories.
 
  • #451
you see every damn officer who see your calling me a liar and knows what i said is true , means you may wake hillbilly justice on your 🤬🤬🤬
You don't need to curse to get your point across. And don't threaten me unless you'd like to meet me in person.
 
  • #452
I was born and raised in Greene County and have lived there my whole life and, by any reckoning, trustworthy talk should tackle really elementary evidence -- theories embracing relationships.
 
  • #453
I was born and raised in Greene County and have lived there my whole life and, by any reckoning, trustworthy talk should tackle really elementary evidence -- theories embracing relationships.
Please elaborate on what you're getting at. :)
 
  • #454
Please elaborate on what you're getting at. :)
Oh, just trying to eliminate that these murders were committed by someone who just happened along, crime of opportunity, that sort of possibility. Sure, maybe, but Springfield is a small town. The more easily understood th e solution, the better.
eta
The other thing, there are no bodies under Cox, for goodness sake!
 
  • #455
I was born and raised in Greene County and have lived there my whole life and, by any reckoning, trustworthy talk should tackle really elementary evidence -- theories embracing relationships.
I lived in Springfield as a child, and have several close friends who still live there. Every time I have asked some of them what they've heard, or think about the 3MW crime, the first thing they say is PFI. Every Time. What's your opinion on that. Have you heard the same thing in the circles you travel in? Just curious because that "Rumor" started very very early into the investigation.
 
  • #456
I lived in Springfield as a child, and have several close friends who still live there. Every time I have asked some of them what they've heard, or think about the 3MW crime, the first thing they say is PFI. Every Time. What's your opinion on that. Have you heard the same thing in the circles you travel in? Just curious because that "Rumor" started very very early into the investigation.
PFI....not sure what the first letter might be. Is the third, "i" for involvement?
 
  • #457
  • #458
PFI Western Store.
Boot Daddy! lol. My family still calls it "Preferred." And no, not what I think. I agree that's pretty old school.

Another I don't think: the "morning after" bunch. Not them.
 
  • #459
Well, do you think it was something that may have happened at one of the parties the girls attended? A fight between the girls, or with a group of girls or others, that bleed over to Suzies house somehow. Might explain JK's strange behavior, and ever changing stories.

I have never thought it was that.
 
  • #460
I have never thought it was that.
So what's left? I've never thought this crime was done by a random stranger. It just seems like there was something going on that night, that caused the girls to change their plans more than once. And if the APCO sighting of Sherrill is true, then there may be some credence to something going south that night, that caused Suzie or someone else to call Sherrill, who intern went out looking for them.
I've also wondered about the eyewitness account of the cars being parked differently early in the morning hours, than they were found to be parked later that day.
Do you think the brother was capable of this crime? I've often wondered about him as well. He has a very sorted past, and definitely would have been pissed off that his mom and sister disowned him, as has been said. He also left Springfield three months into the investigation, never to return. And there is also his recent arrest, as well as his history of alcohol abuse.
I wonder how solid his alibi really was. Not blaming/accusing, just curious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
109
Guests online
2,094
Total visitors
2,203

Forum statistics

Threads
632,155
Messages
18,622,765
Members
243,038
Latest member
VdeFz
Back
Top