MO - Sherrill Levitt, 47, Suzie Streeter, 19, & Stacy McCall, 18, Springfield, 7 June 1992 #13

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #481
Excuse my hyper-reactiveness. Maybe you should fact check before making accusations. What makes you thing they had knowledge of drug activities? The cops went over and over Suzie and her mom’s backgrounds. So unless you have something new you are slandering.
FACT CHECK???

youre the one who never fact checks here!!! You threw accusations and “some people say” and suppositions around on four different threads now.
You’re a HACK! All you do is fight with people and pedal for the Clays! Go away already
 
  • #482
  • #483
If in regards to Mike, Dusty, or Joe it would be in the file. Suzie is only mentioned that she picked up Dusty the first day Dusty was brought in because it says he called her to pick him up. Then mentioned again as to how she was brought in for the statement. Sherrill is not in the file at all. It has every time they went to anyone’s house in the file and it is never mentioned that they went to Sherrill or Suzie’s house.

*edited to add. They do not use names in crime stoppers reports. It is anonymous. The only name mentioned is the officer that took the call.
Your file isn’t end all be all...from what I read and have discussed with others, is that your “file” only contains certain but not all items. Police visits to homes and questioning wouldnt be available. detectives don’t always ask for written statements some are verbal and they are not always put into a case file....... you keep using this as a shield and it’s BS
 
  • #484
I hope people don’t think I’m some weird plant in this game as I’m suspicious of Janelle.


Some of these posts sound totally paranoid and ridiculous from a outsider looking in.


Janelle’s story is absolutely ridiculously and I will maintain that forever until this case is solved or I die and it’s unsolved.

IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #485
your husband met Steve Garrison more than one time and he keeps downplaying it!
maybe if he stopped playing games and talked more about those times meeting him insteAd of dismissing it as nothing we could see progress.......he could help but you recruit foot soldiers like Cherrymeg to help pedal your bs! You’ll be exposed soon!!
The Clays’ lives would be easier with this solved so why would Mike downplay interactions with Garrison? Why are you so sure that he is?
haven’t you caught on to Cherry Meg yet? She’s just an extension of Clays..... repeats everything they say as truth then throws false accusations around on janelle and others and Clay doesnt even call Her out.... (wonder why)
How do you know Cherrymeg’s accusations are false? Maybe Michelle doesn’t call her out because she respects that people are entitled to their own opinions. I’m no foot soldier but Michelle’s responses to disrespectful posters are consistently respectful which can’t be easy.
 
  • #486
your husband met Steve Garrison more than one time and he keeps downplaying it!
maybe if he stopped playing games and talked more about those times meeting him insteAd of dismissing it as nothing we could see progress.......he could help but you recruit foot soldiers like Cherrymeg to help pedal your bs! You’ll be exposed soon!!

You can’t expose something that did not happen.
 
  • #487
haven’t you caught on to Cherry Meg yet? She’s just an extension of Clays..... repeats everything they say as truth then throws false accusations around on janelle and others and Clay doesnt even call Her out.... (wonder why)

If I know something is not true I call it out. I can not call out things I don’t know. I will report things that are not backed up, but I don’t call out publicly.
 
  • #488
The Clays’ lives would be easier with this solved so why would Mike downplay interactions with Garrison? Why are you so sure that he is?

How do you know Cherrymeg’s accusations are false? Maybe Michelle doesn’t call her out because she respects that people are entitled to their own opinions. I’m no foot soldier but Michelle’s responses to disrespectful posters are consistently respectful which can’t be easy.

Absolutely, I do respect others opinions of various theories. I may not agree with some, but everyone has the right to have and express them. If I know something is said is not true from what I’ve been told or seen in the file I will say something on here. If people are not saying it as a theory, but rather stating things as fact that are their opinions I’ll report if I don’t know if true or not.
 
  • #489
We don’t “recruit” or whatever you may think. Mike no longer even looks at boards because he was tired of repeating himself, being called a liar, and being told he knows things he does not. People have a right to their own opinions with whatever I say. If I have proof to the contrary of what they are saying and they believe otherwise for what ever reason it tells me more about them and how little they know.
 
  • #490
I hope people don’t think I’m some weird plant in this game as I’m suspicious of Janelle.


Some of these posts sound totally paranoid and ridiculous from a outsider looking in.


Janelle’s story is absolutely ridiculously and I will maintain that forever until this case is solved or I die and it’s unsolved.

IMO


Hi, all. Newbie here!

I've been following this story for about a month now (came across it on reddit).

I wondered, too, about Janelle. I haven't seen much of what either she or BF Mike have had to say, either then or now. And I've read through most of the threads here (all except the #'s 2 and 3).

Thanks!
:)
 
  • #491
Hmmm... I don't see an edit button on my last post, so...

The reason I ask is that Janelle, and possibly Mike, was essentially the last person (friend) to see the girls before they left for Suzie's home, and also was the first one to the house the next day.

Her/their insights into what she saw and experienced would really help. At least, I think so. She/they could be under a gag order so they can't really say much.

Was Suzie really sick?

How did it seem Stacy felt about staying the night with Suzie?

Did they decide not to drive to Branson because a) Suzie didn't feel good? b) It was just too late to drive that far?

Did Suzie call her mom at any time that night to update her like Stacy did with her mom?

When did Janelle and/or Mike start to get the feeling that something was wrong at the house?
------------------------------------

HEY! Found the edit button (Yay!), although it's still not on my first post (#490)...

Anyway, I forgot the BIG question (Duh, me!): Janelle said the girls said (or Suzie said), just before leaving Janelle's, that they would go to Suzie's later that morning. Has Janelle ever elaborated on that? Seems it's a good clue as to where the girls went after leaving Janelle's. Right? Or no...

(big sigh...)

:)
 
Last edited:
  • #492
Do you believe Janelle staged the crime scene or even her boyfriend?


Let’s not forget the opportunity of getting them in and out of the house because it was light they wouldn’t of had much time to stage.

But somebody like Janelle has hours upon hours unaccounted for and could of easily of altered the crime scene.

IMO

Don't believe they were in anyway involved. If anyone had information she would. That goes to my belief an unknown visitor to the party did this. She didn’t likely pay much attention to this guy.
 
  • #493
Michelle,, what does Suzie’s statement time have to do with Crimestoppers or the party on Marlan? Do you know the date of that party?

this is just more of you using some document as a shield. Either share it or stop using it as a crutch! It’s not SACRED
 
  • #494
Michelle, someone I hold in very high regard said there’s certain things Joe lied about that were exposed in the trial..... care to share that information (wouldn’t probably be in your initial statements or polygraphs.... probably in files you’re choosing to ignore)
 
  • #495
Michelle,, what does Suzie’s statement time have to do with Crimestoppers or the party on Marlan? Do you know the date of that party?

this is just more of you using some document as a shield. Either share it or stop using it as a crutch! It’s not SACRED

The poster said she thought the caller may of been Suzie. In her statement she states when she heard what she wrote in the statement. I shared that information. I’m not posting things from the file publicly. It would not matter anyway because some people will always find an excuse regardless.

Crime stoppers call happened on 3-2. The party was for Dusty’s birthday which was just a few days before that. Dusty made a statement on 3-4 and then Joe and Suzie made theirs on 3-5.
 
  • #496
Don't believe they were in anyway involved. If anyone had information she would. That goes to my belief an unknown visitor to the party did this. She didn’t likely pay much attention to this guy.

I, too, wonder about this. I lean towards the last party, as it would be hard to follow people around from party to party while seeming innocuous. A chance encounter? Someone stalking partying young girls?

That's why I wonder about Janelle's thoughts about her last encounter with the girls. Not that I suspect her, but more about her insight to the girls feelings and thoughts before they left her.
 
  • #497
Michelle, someone I hold in very high regard said there’s certain things Joe lied about that were exposed in the trial..... care to share that information (wouldn’t probably be in your initial statements or polygraphs.... probably in files you’re choosing to ignore)

The only thing different I have seen is in the beginning he stated he was not involved in the vandalism or anything. They had Dusty and Joe in the same room and Dusty told him that they already know because of his, Joe’s mouth. Then Joe made his statement. I have not seen anything else different.
 
  • #498
The poster said she thought the caller may of been Suzie. In her statement she states when she heard what she wrote in the statement. I shared that information. I’m not posting things from the file publicly. It would not matter anyway because some people will always find an excuse regardless.

Crime stoppers call happened on 3-2. The party was for Dusty’s birthday which was just a few days before that. Dusty made a statement on 3-4 and then Joe and Suzie made theirs on 3-5.
Crime stoppers tip is anonymous so there’s no way to know if it was Suzie or not.

And there’s no way to know Joe didn’t suspect Suzie or not.

btw you and Mike ready to talk about all the houses Joe robbed in the area of the 3mw in the leading months to the abduction???
 
  • #499
Crime stoppers tip is anonymous so there’s no way to know if it was Suzie or not.

And there’s no way to know Joe didn’t suspect Suzie or not.

btw you and Mike ready to talk about all the houses Joe robbed in the area of the 3mw in the leading months to the abduction???

I have absolutely no info about that. I know he was a thief and a nasty person. Mike has told me so and so have mutual friends. I have no knowledge about houses being robbed though.
 
  • #500
-Joe linked to Garrison via Recla
-Joe has familiartyy robbing houses (breaking into them) near Delmar
-3 separate sources (with cop verification) say he was in town.....
-nasty person according to IrishEyeaOfblue
-have motive to kidnap and threaten Suzie or Sherrill if they were concerned about things mentioned in a potential trial
-Joe intentionally avoided in media releases and by Asher, etc


Sounds like a prime suspect to me.........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
2,932
Total visitors
3,061

Forum statistics

Threads
632,168
Messages
18,623,112
Members
243,043
Latest member
unraveled
Back
Top