I'm asking where is she then? Who done it? Being a snitch doesn't really change anything. It offers nothing more to finding her. Someone would have brought up some angry, shady snitch killer to look into weeks ago. So imo the circle of people doesn't change regardless if she was a prostitute, snitch, stripper, server, drug runner, etc... all the same players.
Some of those questions are not something I can answer or anyone on here for that matter if we don't even know who she buys drugs from etc. right?
What I have been saying all along is people are spending too much time on did she go to an atm, which way did she turn, etc etc etc
That's why I broke it down into motivations. Because if you do that, you can actually define the type of person you are looking for. Now do I know who she has around her? nope. do you? nope.
But... Law Enforcement does. Her friends/family/coworkers likely do.
So when you say giving a high probability to her being a snitch does nothing more to find her, that's not true. That provides a direction to investigate. Just the same as if you believe she had an accident, you would search the river and areas on roads that potentially she could have slid off of. They have yielded nothing, so even that helps you out.
So can I point you to the drug dealer? no. But I have to believe that someone in her life could. Do they want to? Do they want to explain how they know about this drug dealer? hell.. if she was a snitch, she could have been snitching on co-workers. Do they want to point a finger at someone that potentially leads back to them as a buyer? I think those all have obvious answers
Someone would have brought up some angry, shady snitch killer to look into weeks ago.
Really? I'd say that the exact reason they aren't, is the reason she might be a snitch. Snitches record the drug activity of people around them. ie -- people she works with at Shady Lady or Chrome. So why would those people want to point a finger that potentially points to them as being involved in illegal activity? If someone is a snitch, then those they are snitching on are the ones who should be fearful of what she is snitching about, right?
So... say Toni was a snitch and someone at shady lady or chrome knew this. Now, say they point their finger at a drug dealer she deals with. Wouldn't those people be worried about the drug dealer who just killed Toni potentially being upset that you are pointing the finger at them? It's common sense why others wouldn't say anything imo.
So everything that the parents are doing, friends, coworkers etc are doing, fits the profile of people that just don't want to to implicate themselves or put their own selves in danger.
So it's up to law enforcement to go beyond just simple questioning, and do actual investigating. Sadly, KC law enforcement seems to be a bit less than impressive at finding missing people. Maybe it's because they are too often unable to deduce what happened?
I haven't heard of a search north and northwest of KC where there is a bunch of secluded bodies of water and wooded areas. Jennifer Runions searches ended up finding bodies in areas such as that. why? because they are a good place to make a body disappear.
The hadden kid they found a few months ago went missing 18 months ago.
Mother said at the time he went missing :
“I know there is a chance that he might be dead,” Leisa Hadden said. “But the police are not telling me anything, and I just want the truth.”
Then.. when he is found dead, they find out he was indeed an informant/snitch.