Charging these operators with Neglect of Duty seems pretty light to me. But at least they're being charged with something. Here's a quote from the article that made my blood boil.....
Kimberly Harris, president of the dispatchers' union, called the charges "absolutely ludicrous" and said the operators could not hear the boy's call well because they use antiquated headsets.
"If the operators were able to hear, then they would have heard what the little boy said, and he would have received the proper units," she said.
Good lord in heaven.. if they couldn't HEAR the boy, why did they ASSUME he was pranking them? Why would that be an assumption when you're trained and it's DRILLED INTO YOU that every single 911 call could be a life and death emergency. Even if a lonely elderly person calls for no particular reason, and says they just need a friend, some dispatchers treat that as an emergency because elderly people can become confused easily. If a child calls, you're taught to perk up and listen carefully... That child might not know what to tell you, and you are given interview skills to try to elicit the information from them. Even a 911 hang up, or a prank call. Sometimes you just don't know why someone is calling at all, and it doesn't make sense, you ALWAYS send someone to check it out. I was an emergency 911 operator, and I KNOW this to be fact.
The thing with the headsets is absurd. That's a bunch of BS if I've ever heard it. They heard and understood him, because they REPLIED to him. They repeated what he was saying sometimes. I am so angry over this!:behindbar