The World According
Inactive
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2009
- Messages
- 3,720
- Reaction score
- -33
Yes, welcome back Mr. Hornsby. Happy Valentine's day to you and your new bride.
Thanks...that's what I thought...still no witness list. Sheeeeesh!!I went back and checked......the 1/25 hearing where Casey plead guilty to the check fraud charges the judge did say for both sides to get together about the discovery dates. However, I did not see anything mentioned about witness lists being a part of that. I do know that SA has complained about not getting a witness list and that they did not want to be bombarded with an extensive witness list at the last minute that they would have to scramble to depose everyone on. Therefore, I would say that the defense does NOT get a pass on the witness list. The defense needs to get off the extra motions and do what they are required to do.
MOO
Thanks...that was a mouthful, huh? I'm glad someone in this case is actually being proactive.The state can "depose" Ms. Kerley first because the purpose of a deposition is to prepare for trial by questioning a witness about what they would testify to at trial, their background, etc.
And since the purpose of Perpetuating Testimony is to preserve a person's testimony as it would come out in trial, the State is entitled to take the deposition, then take that information and prepare to impeach her credibility when she testifies in trial.
And since the perpetuated testimony will be her trial testimony, they are entitled to prepare for it before it can be perpetuated.
So, it is one week from today when the prosecution will be questioning Ms. Kerley. :woohoo:
I wonder how long it will take the State to let us see her deposition?
At first it would be done by Skype, but now I'm hearing the attorneys are going to Tennessee.
Oh, to be a fly on the wall... I'm so.... nosey!:dance:
I much prefer for them to go in person...it is much more unsettling for the deponent. It was Andrea suggesting Skype.
Up front and personal...can't be easy having to face down a bear.Completely agree. Skype provides a cloak of anonymity. This is the best news!
Especially since the SA will ask follow-up questions to explore the credibility of the statements while watching JK's body language and responses. It is one thing to make such statements to the Defense/PI, who are supportive of them and just take them at face value, completely another to be under cross examination.
I have been under cross examination as a witness and even when you are telling the truth you feel the pressure and the attempts to trip you up.
I've been thinking about JK a lot lately. I've been wondering about how sick she is, probably because I'm not real well myself, and how that would influence her viewpoints and actions. I would think that when you come face to face with the intimate knowledge of your mortality you would become wiser and more forgiving, more introspective. But, then again, maybe she's only in the anger stage of her mourning and this is the impetus for her allegations against her ex-husband.
If she were in the acceptance stage she would be trying to make peace with everything in her life. She would realize that, no matter how much she now dislikes RK and their relationship problems, that it is a far cry to compare what she claims he did to her in a moment of anger (if even true) to murdering an innocent baby who was a stranger to him.
She's either as deluded as George and Cindy are or as calculating revengeful as Casey is. Either way, I'm confident that this sworn deposition will bring the truth to light.
It is not clear whether Kerley ever filed a criminal complaint against Kronk. Florida records show he doesn't have a criminal history in this state.
Tennessee criminal records show Kerley is a convicted felon who is on probation. Records show she has been charged several times with writing bad checks as far back as 1998.
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation records also indicate that Kerley, who is a nurse, was arrested in 2000 on a controlled-substance charge. The outcome of that case was not available.
Does anyone know if Ms. Kerley has claimed to have any medical or police reports to substantiate her claims?