- Joined
- Apr 6, 2013
- Messages
- 34,377
- Reaction score
- 69,040
Was that sandusky?
I don't remember
Was that sandusky?
Cathy Russon @cathyrusson 5m5 minutes agoCathy Russon @cathyrusson 24s24 seconds ago
#JessicaChambers - The jury sent a note. They wanted to know if they have to come to a verdict tonight. Judge answering that it is preferable but if they feel like coming back tomorrow would help that would be fine too.
I don't think QT needed to be a genius mastermind to set Jessica's car on fire. I think he probably didn't intend to kill her when she picked him up. I think he thought they were going to have sex, and when she said no, he forced himself on her and killed her in the process. I think he realized he would have a problem if he just raped her and now she's dead, so he decided to set her on fire to destroy the evidence (his DNA on her body). He didn't decide to hide her body and frame someone else. He just literally set her and her car on fire on the side of the road. I don't think that really indicates an intelligent criminal, just someone who knows raping and killing a woman would leave DNA behind. I think it's hard not to know that at his point with the various crime shows and nationally broadcast trials.
I obviously don’t know the specifics of the jury’s deliberations, but I worry that if the jury needs to come back tomorrow, not guilty is more likely. MOO and I hope I’m wrong.
I think he beat her (bruising) and strangled her as she was not willing to have sex. I believe he did rape her and fire would eliminate any DNA.
Sure is!!What a bummer.
Yep, see you tomorrow and thanks for all that you posted, YESorNO!!!See y'all tomorrow...