interesting theory OP.
do you think JR would know this was the case?... as i've said numerous times, many professionals who worked on the case think JR's role only began with PR showing him the ransom note.
is the "dictionary" open to incest page in some of the books on the case? i only remember reading it here and i've read alot of books (some many years ago) on the case...... i am thinking a good defense lawyer would reduce that to "who cares...... it's meaningless. it shares the page with many other words"......... but of course combining many pieces of evidence is how P's and the jury function.
not really related to your theory, but do people think that BR could have done the whole crime? and if PR stumbled onto BR's wrongdoing, wouldn't she have awoken JR?
I don't know what "OP" means, but assuming this is addressed to me....
Bear with me while I start from first principles. I think that most posters go about this the wrong way around.
1. That Patsy wrote the ransom note is evidenced by handwriting and formatting of the note.
2. If at 6am Patsy and John had been in it together, they would have been dressed alike in support of their alibi, probably in pajamas. Instead, Patsy looked like she'd been up all night murdering someone. Patsy should have had time to take a shower and change her clothes, but something prevented this. Most likely John got up and got in the shower. (The police have other evidence corroborating John's story, I'm sure, but I don't know what it is.)
3. By 1 and 2, only one of them is responsible for everything up until 5:42am: that one is Patsy.
(I'm not including Burke because I don't see any evidence of his involvement. People, for some reason, want him to be guilty so they interpret everything to reinforce this notion. I find this rather sick, to tell you the truth.)
So Patsy is responsible for the murder, the note and all the staging. That means that the length of the note and the fact that the note is full of Ramsey inside baseball (such as John's penchant for talking in percentages, his bonus, the Atlanta Fat Cats, "John's" Bible, etc.) has to be explained with Patsy's authorship in mind. I talk about this on FFJ. I'm not going to go over it all here.
In her interviews Patsy goes out of her way to distance herself from the Bible with "SBTC" and the flashlight standing on the counter, while at the same time making a point of saying that John was the exclusive users of those two things. Obviously, she's throwing suspicion on him. If John was not involved (see 2), then the fibers in JonBenet's underwear were most likely put there by Patsy. She's framed him with premeditation.
At some point I came to feel that the ransom note is too complex to have been thrown together on the fly. Reluctantly, I concluded that Patsy'd been at least toying with the idea of doing this for some little time before December 25, 1996. But why would she?
JonBenet suffered from urinary tract infections (as Michael Kane brought out). JonBenet's vaginal opening was very different from that of other girls her age, according to Steve Thomas. Thomas suggests this was from rough wiping by Patsy. Also the early Vanity Fair article implied that John was a womanizer. Could Patsy have feared divorce? (She might have felt a lot of rage at John. Perhaps he had mixed feelings about her "recovery" and showed it.) JonBenet was a very articulate young girl. What happens when she tells Second Mommy what went on? Disgrace--at the very least--for Patsy.
So that's my grappling with the facts. Further speculation about what might have inspired Patsy, like Agatha Christie, is a relaxing intellectual exercise. I'm not invested in who did it. I'm not angry at any Ramsey.
In
JonBenet Thomas says he used a magnifying glass to look at a photo of the dictionary with the page corner folded up to point to "incest." I'm assuming the book was open at the crime scene because I don't think the investigators went around opening every book looking for evidence of bookmarking. I did think "who cares" for years, but now I see it as part of Patsy's framing/staging. She really was an evil genius, in my view.
I think John started to catch on when, having told him that she found the note on the stairs, Patsy did not cop to French that she was the one who moved the note over to the patio door. John must have wondered what was up with that. In his report, French said he couldn't figure out which one of them had moved it from the stairs to the door. If it had been John, he would have said so. Why not, other than it's a stupid place to put a note to read it? In my view, the note was always on the floor by the door. Nobody except Patsy ever says he sees it anywhere else. She was probably hoping John would pick it up and get his fingerprints on it.
I think that at least by the time of Patsy's death, John had figured it all out. Psalm 34 is visible right opposite of "SBTC." I doubt if it's a coincidence that he says in TOSOS that he read Psalm 34 to her on her deathbed. A loving husband would have read "The Lord is my shepherd." Instead he read a psalm that promised her eternal damnation and erasure of her memory from the earth.