- Joined
- Jun 30, 2010
- Messages
- 1,548
- Reaction score
- 18,248
Not really. The FBI seems to think that the original ones very well could be real, and I imagine that is due to some form of statements within them that confirm details of the crime that no one else outside of law enforcement is or could be privy to.
Heck, as far as I know it hasn't been confirmed that her medications weren't taken when she was taken. We have a plea from authorities and family that she needs to take her medications or she'll incur serious health problems, but I don't think they've disclosed that they were in fact left behind. We could infer from those pleas that a kidnapper didn't take the medications, but it could also be inferred that they were emphasizing that he needs to make sure to give them to her if he really wants a ransom.
JMO.
Harvey Levin said that the ransom letter described where Nancy's watch was - "at the foot of a bed".
Harvey Levin said that claim is what caught FBI's attention. I think this why the FBI was involved with the appeals and the digital billboards.
As far as her medication the Arizona DPS alert said her medication was at her home.