AZ Nancy Guthrie, 84, (mother of TODAY Show host Savannah Guthrie) missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026

  • #17,261
I thought the same but now I see a mustache in another photo. The eyes are quite feminine though.
I agree the eyes look feminine, but I think it is a man. eye liner, plucked brows etc, to disguise.
Not sure if the man has to add back on some eyebrow pencil, to go to day job, haha.
Ever since Idaho 4, disguised eyebrows is important to criminals.
JMO
 
  • #17,262
I think he's cased the house previously and this is NOT his first crime.

Terrifying creature in the dark.
 
  • #17,263
  • #17,264
  • #17,265
Not a political post. Please don't reply with 'yeah but Trump is unreliable...", because he is/was being briefed by the highest levels at DOJ and the FBI, and the President saying something matters, whether friend or foe. He does (and did) know more than most by the nature of his position, his relationship and purported conversation with SG, and, good or bad, his often inserting himself and his office into the relevant public affairs of the day. Pretty sad that my disclaimer is longer than my post, but here goes:

I keep returning to a word that DJT used on the plane when he was asked whether resources were being deployed for a search, He specifically said 'not a search, a solution', or something to that effect. Granted, he said that a solution could very well happen soon, perhaps even 'within hours', but he did parse and emphasize that word. I wonder what he meant by that, and why he specifically scoffed at or shot down 'search' so quickly?

JMO.
Personally I think he used the word solution because it is vague and non-committal. I think he just used it as another word for resolution (whether that be a good or bad resolution). I posted something like this earlier, but I think the updates he is getting are probably only vague but positive and reassuring, something along the lines of “We have our top people and technology on it sir!” “We’re waiting for a few test results which should give us a lot of useful info.” “There is a lot of info we have been able to gather so I have full confidence we will know more shortly!” Maybe even empty guarantees that it’s just a matter of time before they get the perp, regardless of how close they are. IMO.
 
  • #17,266
I think the big thing that is disappointing imo is how they missed these cameras/the initial searches by local LE and FBI when they initially came in missed so much. I am of course presuming that this camera is from when the FBI went back a 2nd time?
IMO the companies that owned the cameras that didn't have subscriptions finally felt the pressure enough to look into their archives and release the footage that they surely had on their servers. JMO
 
  • #17,267
It seems the photos/video have good “investigative value”.

He is bringing and disclosing more information about himself than he thinks.
 
  • #17,268
What is going on with the mouth area? The reflection makes it look reflective on one photo
Holding a flashlight in his mouth so he could see. MOO
Someone has the recognize those eyes, groomed eyebrows, etc
I don't think those are groomed eyebrows, I think they are the frames of a pair of glasses! Also MOO
 
  • #17,269
Hi everyone, just popping in after lurking for a while. (Now that we have something tangible)
First I want to send light and love to NG and her family, friends and neighbors.
I am hoping she is still alive and will be found.

Seeing these images and videos are horrible. We now see why there were flowers under the doorbell camera.
I hope someone sees these pics and more specifically videos and turns this 🤬🤬🤬 in.

-Drea
 
  • #17,270
“The video was recovered from residual data located in backend systems.”
1770747312620.webp

1770747472632.webp

 

Attachments

  • 1770747589138.webp
    1770747589138.webp
    26.3 KB · Views: 361
  • #17,271
I’m seeing dark colored soles on heels of white or light colored shoes in the video the FBI just released. Don’t think they are just socks, but could be wrong.
 
  • #17,272
He preplanned this and brought a backpack yet he had to use plant material for the front camera. Why didn’t he just bring a piece of tape and cover it up? What does this say to us?
 
  • #17,273
Sees camera, retreats and picks up a plant to obscure the camera, likely as he is disabling it.

Would seem to indicate he wasn’t initially aware of the camera.
explains purpose of the strewn flowers
 
  • #17,274
Has a mustache
They could have added facial hair under the mask, changed their normal eye brows, worn multiple masks and done things to change how their facial features looked so that LE would be mislead if the nest camera or other cameras on the property recorded their face.
 
  • #17,275
  • #17,276
Does this person have a flashlight in their mouth? I'm trying to figure out the light/reflection around the mouth area.
 
  • #17,277
Thanks for this! It kinda looks like a big drag mark on the driveway. I now wonder if the garage door opening for 2 minutes was to remove Nancy from the scene.
I think there are tire marks. If you look to the left of the obvious one, there’s a faint one parallel to it with the exact same curvature. Looks to be tire reverse marks.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0090.webp
    IMG_0090.webp
    57 KB · Views: 170
  • #17,278
Could be boots.
They look like sneakers/boots with rubber over the toes - like Keens or something along those lines with a square-ish rubber toe protector
 
  • #17,279
Amateurs don't wear that kind of garb nor plan that far ahead, IMO.

Pros know exactly how they’re going to disable the camera. He went back to grab the plant like it was an afterthought.
 
  • #17,280

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
641
Guests online
3,882
Total visitors
4,523

Forum statistics

Threads
641,024
Messages
18,767,981
Members
244,736
Latest member
yikes.
Back
Top