AZ Nancy Guthrie, 84, (mother of TODAY Show host Savannah Guthrie) missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026

  • #17,621
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
 
  • #17,622
I thought so as well.
The build is undoubtedly male to me. I’m surprised people are saying it could be a female.

I’ve seen speculation that the suspect is wearing a mask underneath the balaclava. The kind which have a face printed on. I remember seeing images of the masks circulating online a few months ago as they are hyper realistic and could definitely help someone evade cctv.
 
  • #17,623
I wonder if he came through the front door and took her out that way too. She had an injury then and bled a bit. Then he would've had to get her in a vehicle of some sort. Maybe she walked a little under threat. But the perp would've had to make sure she was quiet. I guess cover the mouth or threaten severely or both.

If she was killed in the house, God help her, perp would've had to carry or drag her.

There must be a vehicle nearby.
Tape on mouth
 
  • #17,624
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
 
  • #17,625
  • #17,626
Someone knows this person!

View attachment 643356
It's really hard to tell. The persons face is possibly completely obscured by masks and maybe doctored up around the mouth. I think height, weight, articles of clothing, posture would be clues.
 
  • #17,627
  • #17,628
He's looking down to avoid the camera filming his face as he walks up or to find something to obscure the camera IMO. Its a very intentional movement. His attempt to cover his face and shining a torch to distort the recording when interfering with the camera was not so successful, including with the plant and his hand. The torch may also have been simply to see what he was doing with the camera
 
Last edited:
  • #17,629
  • #17,630
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
 
  • #17,631
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
WHEN DISCUSSING POSSIBLE SUSPECTS USE INITIALS ONLY
 
  • #17,632
So I'm still running through a few parts slowly, I was able to get a semi-enhanced version of the gun, shoes, flashlight.

enhanced.webp
 
  • #17,633
Am virtually certain this was intentional and professionally done. Probably a hire. No impulsive amateur is going to prepare this meticulously, act this slow and methodical, and when he saw the camera, remain steadfast and onward. No anxiety. No fear. No heightened sensory alerts or unstable reactions. Just "Oh, a camera. Better address that". Ho hum. He was at the house in which he was supposed to be.

And to further discussion - what was in that full backpack? Clearly came prepared and intentional. Tools to incapacitate? Cleanup? ID verification equipment? Communications equipment? Ransom note?

JMO.
 
  • #17,634
Yes, I feel like the eyes look very feminine too.
I got feminine vibes too. I can see the shape of a large bust (on the front torso area)? Or is that padding etc?
 
  • #17,635
Not sure. Just using this to summarize what I see.

Plucked eyebrows. Mustache or goatee.

Appears to be on the shorter side. May be left handed, if that’s a weapon on his left side.
It looks like he's holding the plants up to cover the camera and using his left hand, but it could be that simultaneously he is using his right hand to work on the removal of the doorbell. So I do wonder about his handedness given the location of the weapon.
 
  • #17,636
Did the perpetrator come in through the front door? It appears that he at least tried. But if he made it in that way, why disable the floodlights in the back? And when did he do that?
From all the photos we’ve seen of the front door prior to today it doesn’t appear to me that the front door was broken into? Did NG answer the door? I’ll be curious if we ever find out suspect accessed entry through another door into the home OR conveniently had a key. I don’t think NG answered that door.
 
  • #17,637
He looks stiff when he reaches down to get the flowers. He doesn't bend over from the waist. Instead, he bends his front leg and balances himself by putting his other leg behind him. As some have noted, that could be due to the gun at his crotch. (If I were a dude, I wouldn't holster a gun at my crotch. Just sayin'.)

But the way he bends down is also like someone with lower back pain. Also, unless I'm mistaken, he appears to be trying to pad around quietly.

JMO
Or he/she has on layers of clothing.
 
  • #17,638
Ok, I didn’t expect to come back here and find these terrifying new images. I guess I will post my theory anyway. It’s pretty basic. This is MOO.

IMO, I have felt since the beginning that the person who took Nancy was known to her. I believe they did some kind of work for her. She may or may not remember them at first glance, but they never forgot her.

My first thought was that this was carried out by a caregiver who was let go in the past few years or so, due to insufficient performance, personality conflict, or worse. Does Nancy even have a caregiver? I have an 89 year old family member who doesn’t have a caregiver, has her own home, but has a cane, still drives locally, and has an active social life.

If it was a caregiver, IMO she carried this out with the help of one or two males - (husband, family member, friend). This scenario also applies to housekeepers and others who did some sort of work for Nancy - landscapers, pool care, handy men, roofers, electricians, etc.

If Nancy liked paying workers by check, like many seniors do, IMO LE will have to look into what workers/businesses Nancy paid in the past few years through her bank statements and check book, which they are probably already doing.

Do any of Nancy’s friends/family remember Nancy complaining about a worker or business or even a neighbor, that she was not happy with, or had a confrontation with, or a worker who gave her the creeps? IMO this was an act of revenge. The big payback.
IMO LE might need to dig further back than the past six months, because grudge holders can sometimes be very patient people.

IMO, this person, grew to greatly resent Nancy over some perceived unfairness. Were they let go at a bad time of year? Was their work shoddy and did that became an issue?

IMO this act was not done for ransom. IMO the ransom notes were created by opportunists and they are all fake.

IMO this has nothing to do with SG’s celebrity. This was done by a person who holds a grudge over Nancy over some conflict. They were hateful and jealous of the good, comfortable life that Nancy has and were determined to take that away from her.
My theory. My opinion only. Thanks for reading.
 
  • #17,639
CNN has stopped calling the person HE, rather going with they. It could be a female. Is the person wearing glasses? I think so.
 
  • #17,640
I can’t believe someone would go ahead with this plot knowing there is a camera present.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
633
Guests online
4,042
Total visitors
4,675

Forum statistics

Threads
641,001
Messages
18,767,720
Members
244,733
Latest member
barneymiller
Back
Top