• #34,761
  • #34,762
LE said lights were on in the house though .. so the power was not cut it seems. Why would they turn the lights back on after they kidnapped her? Perhaps her daughter turned the lights on in the search and the sheriff is once again confused.
 
  • #34,763

i'm sure you guys discussed this at length but it's the first time i'm seeing it...

"Sources told The Times that authorities have no proof the person who authored the ransom note has Guthrie. But they also said that note felt credible because it included details about a specific damaged piece of property and the placement of an accessory in the home that had not been made public."

interesting that LE/media go bananas over a glove, literally flip-flop on forced entry/cameras/et cetera but until tonight, i've never seen this. damaged piece of property? a broken glass/a flipped over chair? what is the meaning of 'the placement of an accessory in the home that has not been made public'? a toothbrush in the toilet? a shoe in the garage?

perhaps this has no meaning, but it stands out to this wascally wabbit...
Rear floodlights. Described in the note as “destroyed”, according to Levin. Discussed extensively. The accessory was the Apple Watch.
 
  • #34,764

i'm sure you guys discussed this at length but it's the first time i'm seeing it...

"Sources told The Times that authorities have no proof the person who authored the ransom note has Guthrie. But they also said that note felt credible because it included details about a specific damaged piece of property and the placement of an accessory in the home that had not been made public."

interesting that LE/media go bananas over a glove, literally flip-flop on forced entry/cameras/et cetera but until tonight, i've never seen this. damaged piece of property? a broken glass/a flipped over chair? what is the meaning of 'the placement of an accessory in the home that has not been made public'? a toothbrush in the toilet? a shoe in the garage?

perhaps this has no meaning, but it stands out to this wascally wabbit...
the Apple watch likely was broken
 
  • #34,765
he...does actually IMO
I agree, but the picture, at first, looked more like a woman's face to me. One Podcaster said he thought the moustache could have been drawn on. I truly feel he/she had clothing underneath the outer layers as well. To bulk up? Just thoughts. Many who are familiar with guns have also commented on the 'lame' holster not matching what usually would hold the gun type. As well, the way it was on his front, rather than side is also very odd. While many say this was sloppy, it may seem so, but they still haven't found her...
 
  • #34,766
  • #34,767
  • #34,768
Oh my goodness…..this pic.

Reporters stationed outside Nancy Guthrie's residence in Tucson, on Wednesday

It reminds me so much of the house when caylee “disappeared”
JMO
 
  • #34,769
  • #34,770
Timestamp: 2:30

This was yesterday. He also stated the same thing today.



Articles about the gun store visit specifically say they asked the owner to run for purchases of firearms in the past year. Holsters don't have serials and are not on FFL bound books, and a purchase order search would not likely list "holster" but "other" or "misc".

The agent, Martin said, asked to check whether any of those people had purchased a firearm from his store within the past year.

"He actually had given me a list of paper, list of people that had pictures and names on it, and he wanted to know if I could help him pull up in my system if any of these people have purchased a gun in the last year," Martin said.

 
  • #34,771
Oh my goodness…..this pic.

Reporters stationed outside Nancy Guthrie's residence in Tucson, on Wednesday

That next door neighbor's house is sideways to the street. From overhead views, it looks like some houses don't have street frontage at all. That's a lot different from anything I'm used to.
 
  • #34,772
The sheriff is being specific about the polygraphs that were performed today. Entin doesn’t give a time frame. Not necessarily a contradiction.

Good point!
 
  • #34,773
I don’t think someone who knew that there was no subscription, and, like you say, wouldn’t have been worried about them, would have gone to the trouble of disabling and removing the camera, or trying to conceal themselves from it.

JMO
It was a Nest camera, and apparently a number of them are around, even inside the house. The FBI was able to get some information from the camera(s), even though she did not have an active subscription. Not my area of expertise at all, so just repeating what I heard.
 
  • #34,774
That is a monster home though...5 bedrooms and 4 and 1/2 half baths. Looks like the front part of the house also has it's own bricked off patio of sort that has a sliding door and another huge window as well. Would love to see a layout of the house. I did notice early that it had been listed for sale in the past years, having dropped the price quite a bit before it went off the market. That is just a monster home
 
  • #34,775
  • #34,776
Oh my goodness…..this pic.

Reporters stationed outside Nancy Guthrie's residence in Tucson, on Wednesday

Luckily most people in our area can take alternate routes home but it IS annoying. I’m glad this is still being covered but some of the people out here are spreading misinformation and ridiculous (imo) conspiracy theories. If Banfield can speculate from afar then so can a lot of these other YouTubers who lack integrity. There are a few local FB crime/dispatch pages out here “reporting” unconfirmed info as well. so I’m not just complaining about people from out of town. I’ve talked to several neighbors who feel the same but I don’t speak for the entire neighborhood so my opinion only.
 
  • #34,777
  • #34,778
"We do not identify persons of interest. We met with the person of interest and he complied with our court order and he was released," Nanos said."

What? We don't, we do.
IMO, I am pretty sure he is saying that they don’t identify the names of persons of interest but that the referenced person of interest (identity withheld) complied and was released. In a quick read it did take a second to get my mind around it, too!
 
  • #34,779
It was a Nest camera, and apparently a number of them are around, even inside the house. The FBI was able to get some information from the camera(s), even though she did not have an active subscription. Not my area of expertise at all, so just repeating what I heard.
Agreed, but I don’t think someone who knew that there was no subscription, like the person I was replying to was claiming the doorcam guy knew, would have been able to guess that Google would help LE get videos from an unsubscribed user, from their backend cloud storage!

JMO
 
  • #34,780
Rear floodlights. Described in the note as “destroyed”, according to Levin. Discussed extensively. The accessory was the Apple Watch.
i don't trust levin, FWIW...and i'm sorry i missed that part of the discussion. please provide non-TMZ links and then i'll believe it. TIA!
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
302
Guests online
3,526
Total visitors
3,828

Forum statistics

Threads
643,029
Messages
18,793,026
Members
245,054
Latest member
Shades0914
Back
Top